INTRODUCTION
In the spy/military thriller genre, the two countries which dominate the genre are the UK and the USA. Over the years, the class of protagonist has become a bit stale. In Britain, the most common protagonist is the lone Special Forces soldier, always getting the short end of the stick from the treacherous snakes in Vauxhall Cross and Whitehall. In America, the “independent minded” CIA officer or Tier One operator, who has to dodge bureaucrats who are idiotic at best and treasonous at worst is normally the hero of choice. Granted, if executed well as men like Andy Mcnab and Vince Flynn have shown, using that template will work very well indeed. But in a genre saturated with clones of Jack Bauer and authors who constantly forget they’re in the entertainment business rather than political punditry, few have been brave enough to buck the trend and create an interesting killer, a truly perfect assassin. Barry Eisler of the John Rain series came close, his creation being one of the most creative killers in fiction, but one who would turn into an awkward teenager on his first date at the sight of female company. However, I recently picked up a novel, titled “The Hunter” (Titled “The Killer” in the USA) by Tom Wood,and after reading it, I can honestly say, I’ve found the prefect fictional assassin. For starters, he’s a bad guy, an honest to god amoral anti-hero, who doesn’t fret about the police, killers and others he eliminates over the course of the book. He’s also a mystery, with none of the factions he goes up against knowing who he even is before it’s too late. In the hands of a lesser writer, "The Hunter" would have ended up as another cliché “job gone wrong” story with an unappealing two dimensional villain in the lead. However, Tom Wood took the material he had and made it into a spellbinding first novel of plot, counter-plot and gunfire that surpasses the work of many established names in the genre and stars a main character who’s much more complex and appealing then he appears to be at first glance. Now to the review, what happens when the best assassin in the world has a bad day on the job...
The novel begins in Paris France. The protagonist, Victor, is in the process of completing a simple mission. With a suppressed FN Five-SeveN he shoots a man carrying a memory stick with unknown contents and quietly returns to his hotel. Unfortunately, he detects a hit squad looking for him. What follows is a killing spree of memorable proportions as Victor efficiently outwits and removes the killers sent after him, the icing on the cake being what he does with a radio and SIG-556ER. Leaving France, Victor stops to send a threatening message to the intermediary for the job and returns to his secluded property in Geneva. Meanwhile in Langley Virginia at the CIA offices, a storm of epic proportions in brewing. Unbeknown to Victor, he was hired as part of a private black op whose objective was to recover the location of a Russian Frigate with a special cargo which would give the US Navy a serious edge. Unfortunately, the location which was about to be sold by a defector, to the CIA was contained on the memory stick Victor acquired on that night in Paris. Realizing that a separate unauthorized operation was being run in order to acquire the memory stick, the director of the National Clandestine Service begins to smell a rat. Confounding this problem are the plans being made by the directors subordinates who see this jeopardized operation as an opportunity to fulfill their own agendas. Back in Switzerland, Victor is attacked in his property by an American sniper and its location is compromised with the arrival of the Swiss police. Escaping the situation with only minor complications, Victor decides to go on the offensive and as the body count rises, is forced to take on not just the CIA but law enforcement, Russia’s SVR and most threateningly of all, a sociopathic SIS officer who can match wits with the perfect assassin.
In terms of plot, “The Hunter” is elegant. The writing style is highly vivid and has been filed down to a fine point which makes this first novel almost seem written by a seasoned pro. From the opening gunfight in Paris, to a SVR ambush in Russia and the incredibly vicious climax in Tanzania where Victor’s attempts at turning the tables on an entire Spetsnaz GRU team nearly blow up in his face, the story will throw you head first into a world where death is literally one bullet away and life is only worth the wisest move you make. The action is phenomenal, being stylish but only gently pulling on one’s suspension of disbelief, a prime example being the confrontation between Victor and the SIS officer on a Tanzanian riverside. Surprisingly Mr Wood seems to have done his research on tradecraft, nomenclature, weapons and technology, almost to the level of Fredrick Forsyth. For many first books, authors sometimes screw up on the little details that can make connoisseurs of the genre throw fits of rage. Mr Wood avoids this; for starters, he’s one of the few authors I’ve seen who knows the difference between the SVR and FSB and didn't slip up when it came to describing the tradecraft and precautions Victor takes from the silicone solution on his hands which eliminated the risk of fingerprints to immediate disposing his weapons the proper way after jobs. The sniper who even attacks Victor's house uses an actual trick common in the US military to compensate his shots at a running Victor. To those that think Clancy wrote boring and complicated books don’t worry. “The Hunter” doesn’t dwell on the technical aspects of Victor’s profession, the action and characters being the only thing that matters.
And there’s a bonus for people who aren’t particularly political. Unlike certain established authors who believe they need to hit the reader over the head with their own political agenda which may come at expense of action and plot, the author intentionally kept his personal political preferences out of the book, knowing the feeling of those who suffer from boring lectures about why one side of the aisle is right in other books by established names. For that I applaud him and as a result of his move, "The Hunter" is better as a result.
As for characters, there were so many wonderful standouts that I’ll only focus on three. First, there’s Victor, our “villain protagonist”. In a genre packed to the brim with leads that can sometimes come off as boy scouts, he’s a refreshing twist on a character template that has been nailed down over the years. Many protagonists in the genre sugar coat their deeds under the banners of patriotism, making the world a better place and constantly over time self-justify to themselves as they begin to get trapped in a loop. Victor in contrast, couldn’t give a damn.
He knows there’s a special suite in hell waiting for him the day he runs out of bullets and notes that he’s in the profession of “doing what the human race had been perfecting for millennia”. He takes a moral stand in the grey area close to darkness and stays true to his personal beliefs, which should be commended in contrast to others who annoyingly angst about the job they’re in but will continue to do so after their superiors put a 9mm in their hand and tell them who’s the next target.
Most protagonists in the genre sometimes suffer from machismo, make idiotic mistakes which their training should have ironed out of them, fall for their desires for emotional contact and even fantasize about resigning. Victor on the other hand is far more competent, never making an unneeded mistake or breaking tradecraft unless absolutely necessary, has only a few attachments and gladly accepting that he will never leave the profession he’s in. He's also no superhuman, reacting like any trained person would to getting their arm impaled.
But the final thing which sets him apart from the chaff is his characterization. Victor is a phantom. No one knows his real name, personal history or where he received his training. He’s been under plastic surgery multiple times, is fluent in several languages and is at home on Europe and the Americas. Instead, you as the reader can make your own theories and interpretations about who the man really is from the information we’re given. The only things we know about him is that he’s a six-foot white male who’s one hell of an operator, a blend of Jason Bourne from the original Ludlum trilogy and the best aspects of Frederick Forsyth’s Jackal in one immensely destructive package. But during this story, the mask starts to break; he develops a sardonic sense of humour for starters. We also get insights into his life from his taste in art and classical music, a flashback when he was younger and much more vulnerable when on a hunting trip with his uncle and the gradual mellowing of his character.
Secondly, we have the SIS officer pursuing Victor, Reed. Imagine Daniel Craig’s version of James Bond who’s much more sociopathic, decided to go into murder for hire and you can get a general idea of what Reed’s like. Masquerading as a charming British gentleman, he slowly begins to become a lot more unnerving when his true sadistic and gleeful personality begins to appear. He’s the yin to Victor’s yang, equal to our anti-hero in terms of competence. With his customized combat knife, he genuinely gives Victor a run for his money, and in their confrontation, he draws blood and almost guts our man like a fish.
Finally, we have the CIA officer Alvarez who is the only morally “good guy” in the story. With his USMC past and idealistic motivations, in a Vince Flynn type novel, he would be the main character, running round the world, killing threats to freedom and democracy. But instead, he becomes something of a spiritual successor to Claude Lebel from Day Of The Jackal, at the start, doggedly hunting Victor but ends up saving the day in a unexpected fashion.
I have only one small complaint. Throughout the book, the author constantly makes references to the testicles as a verbal tic for the antagonists. I'm not a prude but there are times in parts of the book where it begins to become a touch ridiculous and even comedic due to the regularity. Apart from that problem, I loved "The Hunter.", the best first novel I've read from a new author.
This genre has had very few morally ambiguous stories. The only one I’ve seen recently which came close to being truly amoral was “Black Flagged” by Steve Konkoly. Tom Wood and his creation Victor join this exclusive club above the rest of the pack. With the thrills of Ludlum and the ruthlessness and research of Forsyth, Mr Wood has blasted onto the big leagues of thriller writing with the force of a 7.62mm rifle round and created a bloody good start to a must read series.
COMPLETELY RECOMMENDED.