I decided to read this book primarily because I was intrigued by the prospect of the sort of synergy and dialog that might happen when a Jew and a Christian meet together to study scripture. If the book had more deeply explored that synergy and dialog it might have been a more worthy read. Unfortunately it did not.
This is not to say the book is not without its merits. The best part of the book, and what I presume was meant to be its primary focus, is its exploration of the Lord’s Prayer.
Using a little known manuscript the authors refer to as Hebrew Matthew, they explore the Hebraic origins of the Prayer that Jesus taught his disciples. I think the book does a good job of showing the various complexities related to biblical interpretation that an average church-going English reader of the text most likely would not be exposed to.
There is not a lot of ground breaking work done on the Prayer that the average mainline seminary trained person is not going to have some working knowledge of. However, I was pleased that the book did address a number of popular misconceptions in the church about Judaism. Like the fact that Jesus was not breaking any new ground in referring to God as Father. This fact alone, I am sure would be eye-opening for your average layperson.
There is much that I did not like about this book. For instance why is over half of it devoted to an exploration of where Jesus might have given the sermon on the mount and taught the prayer? I’ve never understood the purpose of this sort of exercise. It seems to me to be nothing more than a big waste of time and effort. It may be interesting to some folks, but it does absolutely nothing for me.
The other thing that was troubling is that there was little interface in this book with modern biblical scholarship. The authors primarily build the argument of this book by working solely with a little know manuscript they refer to as “Hebrew Matthew.” Contending, based on the work of George Howard, a scholar at Macon University, that Matthew was originally written in the Hebrew language.
I am the first to admit that I am not a biblical “scholar” by any means, but you can’t just throw that sort of claim out there and build the basis of your book on it without also interacting with other already established theories of how the various texts as we know them came into being. It’s irresponsible to do so and it will not engage an educated audience in your work.
My recommendation? Use and read the last third of the book that explores the Lord’s Prayer. It will give you some insight into Judaism and the devotional aspects of this material may help deepen and enrich your prayer life. However, you can just go ahead and skip the rest of the book.