I have the second edition from 2010 (the third edition went to print in 2014).
At page 11, we have: "Market makers,...follow strict codes of behaviour." How concerned should we be about that?-ty.
At page 202, we have: "A derivative instrument is an asset whose performance is based on (derived from) the behaviour of the value of an underlying asset (usually referred to simply as the 'underlying'). The most common underlyings are commodities (e.g. tea or pork bellies), shares, bonds, share indices, currencies and interest rates. Derivatives are contracts which give the right, and sometimes the obligation, to buy or sell a quantity of the underlying, or benefit in another way from a rise or fall in the value of the underlying. It is the legal right that becomes an asset, with its own value, and it is the right that is purchased or sold."
What else may be significant in relation to the asset-as-right-and-obligation-as-possible-liability argument?
A readable introduction to the rights and obligations of actors in the capital markets: a Barclays covered warrant example is shown on p246. The distinction between a speculator and an investor is drawn at the top of p252.
At p253, we have: 'In May, Entrenched [PLC, run by the well-respected, highly experienced Chief Executive, Sir John Wiseman] completed at GBP700m share buy-back. Sir John said that the company is throwing off cash and shareholders could probably use the money more effectively than the company. Quote We do not want to grow the business just for the sake of growth - we must generate a return greater than our investors could obtain investing elsewhere with that money to justify expansion. end-of-quote.' Who would like to go first?
Concerning the net profit at p263, to what extent is it clear which indicia of virtue govern the dividends paid out on preference shares?
On p269, we are invited to consider: 'What proportion of any increase in profit is swallowed up by ever larger investments in fixed assets, debtors and stocks needed to maintain earnings growth? If all of the cash is being absorbed, what is going to be left for dividends?' and so, which pathways are available readily to set, articulate and implement a proper and decent dividends policy? What else may be significant in this context?
On p272, we have: 'Example of a profitable company forced into liquidation.' How would this firm be best advised before liquidation and during any restructuring? What else may be significant in this context? Quoth Arnold at p272: 'Examine the [chairman's] statement not for what it contains, but for what it leaves out.' Yay, indeedy.