No need to be baffled any longer by a flurry of information, data, facts and comments, impenetrabel waves of jargon, and the complexities of the financial markets. The Financial Times Guide to Investing will introduce you to the complex art of investing, and how to invest successfully, whether you are actively involved in investing or just thinking about it. In addition to providing a simple guide to understanding how financial markets operate, it will allow you to follow and act on your own judgements based on case studies and worked examples, giving you the chance to experiment successfully with shares, bonds, funds and derivatives. The book is written in a clear and uncluttered manner taking many examples and case studies from the FT.
Glen Arnold is a businessman, investor and professor of investment at the University of Salford. He is the author of numerous finance and investing books.
Dry and very extensive but also very useful. I enjoyed the book thoroughly, some chapters were too difficult to follow so I'd recommend people to take a small introduction to economics and management to get the terms. The indexes and equations chapter was very nicely explained with lots of examples.
Some may not apply to those living outside the UK and it may need to update according to switches in the market. But overall it's a very good book.
Describes most of the famous investments in an easy-understandable manner. Has a plethora of links to external sources in case one want to learn more. Gives a good description of investment company types including funds, trusts, banks.
Good to learn the fundamentals, but it's too focused on UK and is afraid to show mathematical formulas. It mostly focuses on shares instead of mutual funds.
v focused on the UK market which is what I wanted.
was good to learn more about how the UK market is regulated (e.g. FCA, how companies can get listed on the Main Market) and the different tax / regulations for diff investment products. skimmed the bits about how to analyse a company since it covered the porter 5 forces & some generic ratios like Sharpe.
I did not know that FTSE = Financial Times Stock Exchange.... also learned about Building Society Account and Investment Club Accounts.
"In the UK we define shares as equity in companies – the ‘risk capital’ as described above. Stocks are financial instruments that pay interest, such as bonds. "
As a relatively beginner investor, I've found this book to be incredibly insightful and useful. I will definitely be dipping back into this book over time, especially the glossary. Yes, there are some complicated terms if you're not a financial guru but the explanations are in clear English that even I as a beginner can understand. I very much liked the story of Mr Stephenson and Mr Brunel!
This has definitely helped me on my journey with investing!
I have the second edition from 2010 (the third edition went to print in 2014).
At page 11, we have: "Market makers,...follow strict codes of behaviour." How concerned should we be about that?-ty.
At page 202, we have: "A derivative instrument is an asset whose performance is based on (derived from) the behaviour of the value of an underlying asset (usually referred to simply as the 'underlying'). The most common underlyings are commodities (e.g. tea or pork bellies), shares, bonds, share indices, currencies and interest rates. Derivatives are contracts which give the right, and sometimes the obligation, to buy or sell a quantity of the underlying, or benefit in another way from a rise or fall in the value of the underlying. It is the legal right that becomes an asset, with its own value, and it is the right that is purchased or sold."
What else may be significant in relation to the asset-as-right-and-obligation-as-possible-liability argument?
A readable introduction to the rights and obligations of actors in the capital markets: a Barclays covered warrant example is shown on p246. The distinction between a speculator and an investor is drawn at the top of p252.
At p253, we have: 'In May, Entrenched [PLC, run by the well-respected, highly experienced Chief Executive, Sir John Wiseman] completed at GBP700m share buy-back. Sir John said that the company is throwing off cash and shareholders could probably use the money more effectively than the company. Quote We do not want to grow the business just for the sake of growth - we must generate a return greater than our investors could obtain investing elsewhere with that money to justify expansion. end-of-quote.' Who would like to go first?
Concerning the net profit at p263, to what extent is it clear which indicia of virtue govern the dividends paid out on preference shares?
On p269, we are invited to consider: 'What proportion of any increase in profit is swallowed up by ever larger investments in fixed assets, debtors and stocks needed to maintain earnings growth? If all of the cash is being absorbed, what is going to be left for dividends?' and so, which pathways are available readily to set, articulate and implement a proper and decent dividends policy? What else may be significant in this context?
On p272, we have: 'Example of a profitable company forced into liquidation.' How would this firm be best advised before liquidation and during any restructuring? What else may be significant in this context? Quoth Arnold at p272: 'Examine the [chairman's] statement not for what it contains, but for what it leaves out.' Yay, indeedy.