Had this tome been half as long it might have been twice as good.
The ten "metaphors" of the title -- more properly Fox's take on Jungian archetypes--can't be sustained without a good deal of rhetorical padding, quote-mining, repetition, and generally ginning up arguments out of some thin spiritual and sociological ground.
I suspect that ten, being perceived as a "masculine" number (in contrast the the "feminine" 3 x 3=9) became Fox's target as he set down to write this book. Ironically, then, in a critique of the purported patriarchal need to dominate the feminine, he numerically dominates the feminine. The result is a bloated assemblage of related ideas that overlap but never quite coalesce. Too often, what might have been a valid insight into some aspect of western culture sinks under grab-bag of gratuitous references and out-of-context quotes by authors famous and otherwise. The short quotes degenerate into mere decoration, and the longer ones are too often too long. All fall into the same anodyne writing style. And lists, many lists, as if a weak argument is bolstered by a recitation of authors who said something kinda-sorta like that.
Though quoting broadly from world-wide spiritual traditions, Fox never gets past his own white, male, Roman Catholic perspective. Honor and shame are the underlying concern of the early chapters. (Raised as I was in the Protestant tradition, fixation on the honor-shame continuum seem rather quaint; humiliation is what keeps me up nights.) Later chapters, attempting to meld current discourses on matriarchy and patriarchy, are informative but hardly groundbreaking. Some "insights" are quite banal: Young people are not entering nursing due to a cultural shift toward healing professions, health care is where the jobs are.
As other reviewers have noted, the work at times feels like an academic exercise. Five pages worth of discussion are too often stretched to 20 or more -- likely in the service of that patriarchal task-master, ego.