While living a life of reckless debauchery and sexual adventuring, Rochester produced comic verse, scurrilous satires, and highly explicit erotica. His Selected Works , edited by Frank H. Ellis and now available from Penguin Classics, show him to be one of the wittiest and most complex poets of the seventeenth century. With endless literary disguises, rhymes and alliteration, humor and humanity, Rochester's poems hold up a mirror to the extravagances and absurdities of his age.
For more than seventy years, Penguin has been the leading publisher of classic literature in the English-speaking world. With more than 1,700 titles, Penguin Classics represents a global bookshelf of the best works throughout history and across genres and disciplines. Readers trust the series to provide authoritative texts enhanced by introductions and notes by distinguished scholars and contemporary authors, as well as up-to-date translations by award-winning translators.
John Wilmot, 2nd Earl of Rochester was an English libertine, a friend of King Charles II, and the writer of much satirical and bawdy poetry.
He was the toast of the Restoration court and a patron of the arts. He married an heiress, Elizabeth Malet, but had many mistresses, including the actress Elizabeth Barry and drank himself to death at the tender age of 33.
Not surprisingly, it was Graham Greene (who else, indeed?) who first brought John Wilmot, the Earl of Rochester, to my attention. In his brilliant short story "May We Borrow Your Husband?", he referenced the libertine poet cleverly and adroitly - the protagonist and narrator is an aging writer working on a biography of the said figure, not unlike Greene himself who did write a biography (a book that continues to elude my search) too. And the short story too is about hypocrisy, sexuality and even love at first sight. That Rochester fascinated Greene is not surprising so much that it is only appropriate that one of the most empathetic and secular writers of the twentieth century would have found this poet so worthy of reappraisal. It is also a testament to the fact that there was more to this bacchanalian figure of frivolity that what meets the eye at a first glance. This concise collection of poems and writings, annotated meticulously with a glossary (I will never think of the word "ramble" in an innocent sense anymore) and notes, is a perfect introduction to the works of this Bard of the Bawd and also one of the sharpest satirists of his age.
Indeed, it cannot be denied that his erotic works are indeed peerless in their frank and fiery brilliance. "The Imperfect Enjoyment", one of his most well-known works, is a scabrous lament of random erectile dysfunction, a thing that most of us men will shirk at acknowledging publicly; "A Ramble In St James Park" reimagines that pleasant little garden of pigeons and squirrels into a hellish jungle of sin and sleaze; "The Maimed Debauchee" tells with jollity of an old impotent man who takes it upon himself to teach the young how to enjoy their carnal pleasures to the hilt and the savagely profane "To The Postboy" is a defiant rant by a certified sinner of his dirtiest, evilest deeds. These poems are indeed electric and arousing to the reader and are also enlivened with some strikingly nightmarish imagery - the mandrakes rising up from the garden or the cerecloths and ulcers on the body of a sinner and yet the musicality of his rhymes is equally entertaining to read aloud.
This same spirit of droll comedy finds itself expressed manifestly in his larger, more satirical poems - the irreverent picaresque character portraits of "Tunbridge Wells", the shallow hypocrisy of modern love in "Artemis To Chloe" wherein a woman of the city laments the state of romance in a letter to a woman of the country and the freewheeling ribaldry of "Timon: A Satyr" which mocks the burlesque antics of the aspiring poets among whom Wilmot himself moved in London's social circles. And the greatest of these works is the embittered and anguished "A Satyr Against Mankind" in which he lambasts civility and respectability and celebrates instinct, the id itself of human behaviour, against the superego of civilization.
There is thus also a sadder, melancholic side to Rochester, which proves his maturity as a chronicler of his times. The wistful "Consideratus, Considerandus" is a lament of the loss of virtue in the world and the collection also concludes rather suitably with the almost poignant "Upon Nothing" in which he gently and critically questions the very act of creation itself, making his query with God too, wondering why human beings have been unable to inherit the divinity of their creation and creator. And of course, there are then his impassioned, anguished love poems, which echo with a kind of melancholia and defeat themselves and linger in the memory as the words of a man who must have revelled in his carnal pleasures but was not free from the agony of his heart too.
What a notorious celebrity the Earl of Rochester might seem if he had written during the present day. It says a lot for how little have we evolved as human beings, able to judge his actions and his work in their proper light and willing, rather lazily, to condemn him as his exploits and actions would still scandalize many of us. Positioned as he was in the court of King Charles II, he would exhibit however no sign of hypocrisy in his actions and words. Had we the fortune to have him amidst us, at this age, when most talented and gifted people are afraid of confessing their vices and incongruities, Earl of Rochester would have been crowned as something of a hero, a rebel and as it stands, there is no denying the brilliance that shone through those tawdry words, the brilliance of a poet whom we need to rediscover in all his glory.
Libertine poetry at its finest: dirty, raucous, and occasionally truly beautiful. I especially liked the connections to the politics of the English Restoration; Rochester's insights on the king and his court, as well as contemporary London, are fascinating. My favorite poem was definitely the double-edged "A Saytr to Mankind" -- really intriguing look on whether or not reason really does elevate man. Plus, the "saytr/satire" pun allows you to imagine a wise half-horse penning the whole thing. ;)
Best dirty poems ever. They would make ODB cringe. And that's why I love them. Along with Blake, Yates, Eliot, and Stevens, this is who I reach to when I want to read great verse and also learn something.
This one (chanced across via Shakespeare's The Winter's Tale and then dildos on Wikipedia) is probably one of Wilmot's tamer pieces, but it had me in absolute stitches- http://andromeda.rutgers.edu/~jlynch/...
I typically enjoy reading poetry, but I never pick it up in order to be entertained. This was entertaining. But also shockingly vulgar based on what one might expect for the time. Short and sweet. I would definitely recommend this to anyone who thinks poetry is stuffy and boring.