What do you think?
Rate this book
من يتحدث باسم الإسلام؟: كيف يفكر حقًا مليار مسلم؟
هل نحن على مشارف حرب شاملة بين الغرب ومليار وثلث المليارمسلم؟ عندما تبحث وسائل الإعلام عن إجابة على ذلك السؤال، فإنها في العادة تتجاهل الآراء الحقيقية للمسلمين في العالم. إن كتاب «مَنْ يتحدث باسم الإسلام» يدور حول هذه الأغلبية الصامتة بالإكراه. وهذا الكتاب نتاج دراسة لاستفتاء عالمي هائل أجرته مؤسسة «جالوپ» ــ أهم مؤسسات قياس الرأي العام في العالم ــ على مستويات متعددة. وقد أجرت «جالوپ» في هذا المشروع المثير عشرات الألوف من المقابلات مع المواطنين في أكثر من خمس وثلاثين دولة أغلب سكانها من المسلمين، أو تحتوي على نسبة كبيرة من المسلمين. سألت «جالوپ» الأسئلة التي تخطر على بال الملايين: هل يُلام الإسلام على الإرهاب؟ لماذا يكون هناك قدر كبير من الروح المعادي للسياسة الأمريكية في العالم الإسلامي؟ من هم المتطرفون؟.. أين المعتدلون؟ ما الذي تريده حقا النساء المسلمات؟ يستحضر كتاب «مَنْ يتحدث باسم الإسلام» بيانات فعلية من استفتاء «جالوپ» العالمي ــ لا من الخلافات الكلامية ــ وهي تقدم الأدلة النابعة من أصوات مليار مسلم، لا أولئك الأفراد من «الخبراء» أو «المتطرفين»، وتدل على جدل حول واحد من أهم وأسخن الموضوعات في عصرنا.
238 pages, Mass Market Paperback
First published February 25, 2008
53 people are currently reading
2747 people want to read
About the author
John L. Esposito
102 books151 followersHe is a professor of International Affairs and Islamic Studies at Georgetown University. He is also the director of the Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal center for Muslim-Christian understanding at Georgetown University.
Esposito was raised a Roman Catholic in an Italian neighborhood in Brooklyn, New York City, and spent a decade in a Catholic monastery. After taking his first degree he worked as a management consultant and high-school teacher. He then studied and received a masters in theology at St. John's University. He earned a PhD at Temple University, Pennsylvania in 1974, studying Islam and held post doc appointments at Harvard and Oxford. He is well-known as a promoter of strong ties between Muslims and Christians and has challenged the Vatican to make greater efforts to encourage such ties.
A specialist in Islam, political Islam, and the impact of Islamic movements from North Africa to Southeast Asia, Dr. Esposito serves as a consultant to the Department of State as well as multinational corporations, governments, universities, and the media worldwide. In 2005, Professor Esposito won the American Academy of Religion's prestigious Martin E. Marty Award for the Public Understanding of Religion. This award honors a scholar who has been exemplary in promoting the public understanding of religion. A prolific writer, Professor Esposito is the author of over 25 books, including What Everyone Needs to Know About Islam, The Islamic Threat: Myth or Reality?, and Unholy War: Terror in the Name of Islam. He is also the Editor-in-Chief of The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Modern Islamic World, The Oxford History of Islam, and The Oxford Dictionary of Islam.
Esposito was raised a Roman Catholic in an Italian neighborhood in Brooklyn, New York City, and spent a decade in a Catholic monastery. After taking his first degree he worked as a management consultant and high-school teacher. He then studied and received a masters in theology at St. John's University. He earned a PhD at Temple University, Pennsylvania in 1974, studying Islam and held post doc appointments at Harvard and Oxford. He is well-known as a promoter of strong ties between Muslims and Christians and has challenged the Vatican to make greater efforts to encourage such ties.
A specialist in Islam, political Islam, and the impact of Islamic movements from North Africa to Southeast Asia, Dr. Esposito serves as a consultant to the Department of State as well as multinational corporations, governments, universities, and the media worldwide. In 2005, Professor Esposito won the American Academy of Religion's prestigious Martin E. Marty Award for the Public Understanding of Religion. This award honors a scholar who has been exemplary in promoting the public understanding of religion. A prolific writer, Professor Esposito is the author of over 25 books, including What Everyone Needs to Know About Islam, The Islamic Threat: Myth or Reality?, and Unholy War: Terror in the Name of Islam. He is also the Editor-in-Chief of The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Modern Islamic World, The Oxford History of Islam, and The Oxford Dictionary of Islam.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 99 reviews
March 12, 2017
الكتاب رائع، يجب أن أعود لأتحدث عنه :)
----
تحديث 12/11/1431هـ
ليلة جفاني فيها النوم
تعرفت على داليا مجاهد عندما قرأت خبر تعيينها مستشارة لأوباما، وشاهدت الكتاب على رف مكتبة الشروق وعليه إسمها فدفعني الفضول لشرائه، الكتاب يتحدث بلغة الأرقام، أي لغة الإحصائيات حول عدد من الأفكار والآراء في العالم الإسلامي، داليا كإمرأة مسلمة في الغرب، كثيراً ماواجهت الصورة النمطية حول العالم الإسلامي والمسلمين فقررت أن تقوم بعمل استطلاع كبير لعرض وجهات النظر في العالم الإسلامي، وتقديمها للغرب في محاولة لكسر الصورة النمطية، وتقديم صورة أقرب وأكثر عدالة و و موضوعية، الاستطلاع قامت به بواسطة مركز جالوب
وهو مركز متخصص لقياس وجهات النظر حول العالم، كان الكتاب في خمسة فصول تناول خمس من المحاور، الأول كان سؤال حول من هم المسلمون، كان محاولة لتلمس ماذا تشمل كلمة المسلمون حول العالم، وتوضيح أنها مصطلح شامل فضفاض لا نعني به فقط المواطنين في مصر أو السعودية، إنما يشمل دولاً عدة في أفريقا وآسيا وأوروبا، وقام بتوضيح التنوع السياسي والثقافي والإقتصادي والإجتماعي لهذه الدول، والمناطق المسلمة، وأنه من الخطأ وضع إطار ضيق وصورة جامدة لكل هذا التنوع، كان أحد أهم الإستطلاعات في هذا الفصل حول الهوية في هذه الدول، النسبة الكبرى من المشاركين أجابوا بأن الدين مؤشر أولي لهويتهم في الدول الإسلامية، أي أن صورة الدين وأهميته للفرد في الدول الإسلامية رغم كل الظروف التي مروا بها لا تزال قوية، بقية الفصل تطرقت لأركان الإسلام الخمسة لتعريف القاريء الغربي بالديانة الإسلامية ( والكتاب موجه للقاريء الغربي في الأصل)، ثم بعدها تحدثت عن مفهوم الجهاد في الإسلام، وكان هناك استطلاع حول مفهوم الجهاد لدى المسلمين، كانت اجاباته متوزعة مابين مفهوم الجهاد بالقتال والحرب والمفهوم الآخر وهو جهاد النفس، أو ما أطلق عليه في الكتاب الجهاد الغير عنيف.
المحور الثاني كان حول علاقة العالم الإسلامي بالديمقراطية، وتحت عنوان ديمقراطية أم ثيوقراطية، تطرق للعلاقة مابين الشريعة الإسلامية والديمقراطية بالمفهوم الغربي، وهل هناك تعارض بينهما؟، هذا الفصل أعتبره من أكثر الفصول إثارة للإهتمام بالنسبة لي، كانت الأسئلة هنا حول مدى العلاقة بين نظرة الناس للديمقراطية والحريات، في العالم الإسلامي وأيضا حول تطبيق الشريعة الإسلامية كما يرى المسلمون، يعنون به التطبيق العادل الصحيح للشريعة وليس المحرف والصوري، وأحد أهم النتائج التي ظهرت من هذه الإستطلاعات أن المسلمين في الغالب يرغبون بالديمقراطية والحرية مع تطبيق الشريعة الإسلامية، أي رغبتهم بوجود صورة تجمع مابين المباديء الإسلامية والقيم الديمقراطية.
الفصل الثالث كان حول التطرف وعلاقته بالعالم الإسلامي، وكان بعنون ما الذي يصنع الراديكالي؟، تم إفتراض أن أحداث 11/9 هي المعيار للراديكالية السياسية في هذا الفصل وهذا ما لفت انتباهي أنه تجاهل أحداث أخرى كان من الممكن أخذها بالأعتبار مع هذا الحدث، حيث كانت نسبة المؤيدين لهذه الأحداث في الاستطلاع 7% من دول العالم الإسلامي، وتم إعتبار هذه النسبة وحدها معياراً كافياً للحكم بالتطرف السياسي!
تحدثوا في هذا الفصل عن أبرز مشاكل العالم الإسلامي وهي الفقر والأمية، وأنه وبالرغم من هذه الظروف فإن الإرهابيين لا يأتون من هذه الطبقات المسحوقة غالباً، وإنما من طبقات إجتماعية متوسطة، و مما يلفت النظر هو أن المتطرفين أكثر تفاؤلا على المستوى الشخصي من بقية المشاركين في الاستطلاع، رغم تشاؤمهم على المستوى السياسي والدولي!
تم قياس نسبة التدين بين المتطرفين سياسياً ومقارنتها مع نسبة التدين بين بقية المشاركين لتظهر النتيجة بأن النسبة متقاربة إلى حد كبير وأن المتطرفين سياسياً ليسوا أكثر تديناً مثلا من المعتدلين، أي أن الدين ليس دافعاً للتطرف في هذه الحالة إنما حالة الإحباط السياسي التي يعيشها المسلم.
الفصل الرابع كان حول النساء في العالم الإسلامي، بعنوان ماذا تريد النساء؟
الصورة النمطية تقول بأن النساء مقهورات ومظلومات في العالم الإسلامي وهن ضحايا لنظم اجتماعية وسياسية تمارس تمييزاً ضد المرأة، كان الاستطلاع حول عدد من الأفكار مثل تعليم المرأة وكانت النسبة متفاوتة هنا، فبعض الدول نسبة أمية المرأة فيها عالية مثل اليمن وباكستان مقابل ارتفاع نسبة تعليم المرأة في دولة مثل السعودية وإيران والإمارات، وأيضا حول إعجاب المسلمات بالقيم الغربية، وبالمرأة الغربية، كانت نسبة من النساء المسلمات يؤكدن غياب حقوقهن، لكن هذا لا يعني أنهن يطالبن بحقوق الغربيات فهن يعتقدن بأن المرأة الغربية بلا قيمة ثقافية، أي أن المسلمات كن على وعي بأهمية الحقوق القانونية ويشعرن بأهميتها مع رغبتهن بالإحتفاظ بالقيمة الثقافية للمرأة، الفصل عموما كان جميلاً تطرق لعمل المرأة ونسبة المؤيدين له من الرافضين في بعض الدول، أيضا حق النساء في التصويت والعمل السياسي، نظرة المرأة المسلمة حول المساواة، وعدد من الأمور التي تخص المرأة.
الفصل الخامس كان بعنوان صدام أم تعايش؟ تحدث حول فكرة صراع الحضارات، كان أحد الأسئلة المطروحة هنا هل يعارض المسلمين حرية التعبير؟ وماهي الحساسيات الثقافية بين الغرب والعالم الإسلامي، هل الغرب في حالة حرب مع العالم الإسلامي؟ هل ينظر المسلمون للغرب بصورة واحدة جامدة أم أن صورة فرنسا تختلف عن ألمانيا وصورة أمريكا تختلف عن صورة بريطانيا لدى المسلمين؟
إحدى النتائج هي أن الحالة الراهنة هي نتيجة صراع الجهل لا الحضارات.
كان هناك ملحقان في الكتب الأول حول طريقة تصميم الأسئلة واختيار العينات، والثانية حول رحلة جالوب حول العالم لطرح الأسئلة وجمع الإجابات، بالنسبة للسعودية لم تسمح لهم بدءً بعمل الإستبيان، وبعد جهود حصل أحد أعضاء الفريق على تصريح بالقيام به مع التدخل في تعديل الأسئلة (إلى متى؟).
الكتاب ممتع، ومثير للتفكير في بعض النقاط، جهد جميل من المؤلفين والباحثين، رغم أن الترجمة سيئة
----
تحديث 12/11/1431هـ
ليلة جفاني فيها النوم
تعرفت على داليا مجاهد عندما قرأت خبر تعيينها مستشارة لأوباما، وشاهدت الكتاب على رف مكتبة الشروق وعليه إسمها فدفعني الفضول لشرائه، الكتاب يتحدث بلغة الأرقام، أي لغة الإحصائيات حول عدد من الأفكار والآراء في العالم الإسلامي، داليا كإمرأة مسلمة في الغرب، كثيراً ماواجهت الصورة النمطية حول العالم الإسلامي والمسلمين فقررت أن تقوم بعمل استطلاع كبير لعرض وجهات النظر في العالم الإسلامي، وتقديمها للغرب في محاولة لكسر الصورة النمطية، وتقديم صورة أقرب وأكثر عدالة و و موضوعية، الاستطلاع قامت به بواسطة مركز جالوب
وهو مركز متخصص لقياس وجهات النظر حول العالم، كان الكتاب في خمسة فصول تناول خمس من المحاور، الأول كان سؤال حول من هم المسلمون، كان محاولة لتلمس ماذا تشمل كلمة المسلمون حول العالم، وتوضيح أنها مصطلح شامل فضفاض لا نعني به فقط المواطنين في مصر أو السعودية، إنما يشمل دولاً عدة في أفريقا وآسيا وأوروبا، وقام بتوضيح التنوع السياسي والثقافي والإقتصادي والإجتماعي لهذه الدول، والمناطق المسلمة، وأنه من الخطأ وضع إطار ضيق وصورة جامدة لكل هذا التنوع، كان أحد أهم الإستطلاعات في هذا الفصل حول الهوية في هذه الدول، النسبة الكبرى من المشاركين أجابوا بأن الدين مؤشر أولي لهويتهم في الدول الإسلامية، أي أن صورة الدين وأهميته للفرد في الدول الإسلامية رغم كل الظروف التي مروا بها لا تزال قوية، بقية الفصل تطرقت لأركان الإسلام الخمسة لتعريف القاريء الغربي بالديانة الإسلامية ( والكتاب موجه للقاريء الغربي في الأصل)، ثم بعدها تحدثت عن مفهوم الجهاد في الإسلام، وكان هناك استطلاع حول مفهوم الجهاد لدى المسلمين، كانت اجاباته متوزعة مابين مفهوم الجهاد بالقتال والحرب والمفهوم الآخر وهو جهاد النفس، أو ما أطلق عليه في الكتاب الجهاد الغير عنيف.
المحور الثاني كان حول علاقة العالم الإسلامي بالديمقراطية، وتحت عنوان ديمقراطية أم ثيوقراطية، تطرق للعلاقة مابين الشريعة الإسلامية والديمقراطية بالمفهوم الغربي، وهل هناك تعارض بينهما؟، هذا الفصل أعتبره من أكثر الفصول إثارة للإهتمام بالنسبة لي، كانت الأسئلة هنا حول مدى العلاقة بين نظرة الناس للديمقراطية والحريات، في العالم الإسلامي وأيضا حول تطبيق الشريعة الإسلامية كما يرى المسلمون، يعنون به التطبيق العادل الصحيح للشريعة وليس المحرف والصوري، وأحد أهم النتائج التي ظهرت من هذه الإستطلاعات أن المسلمين في الغالب يرغبون بالديمقراطية والحرية مع تطبيق الشريعة الإسلامية، أي رغبتهم بوجود صورة تجمع مابين المباديء الإسلامية والقيم الديمقراطية.
الفصل الثالث كان حول التطرف وعلاقته بالعالم الإسلامي، وكان بعنون ما الذي يصنع الراديكالي؟، تم إفتراض أن أحداث 11/9 هي المعيار للراديكالية السياسية في هذا الفصل وهذا ما لفت انتباهي أنه تجاهل أحداث أخرى كان من الممكن أخذها بالأعتبار مع هذا الحدث، حيث كانت نسبة المؤيدين لهذه الأحداث في الاستطلاع 7% من دول العالم الإسلامي، وتم إعتبار هذه النسبة وحدها معياراً كافياً للحكم بالتطرف السياسي!
تحدثوا في هذا الفصل عن أبرز مشاكل العالم الإسلامي وهي الفقر والأمية، وأنه وبالرغم من هذه الظروف فإن الإرهابيين لا يأتون من هذه الطبقات المسحوقة غالباً، وإنما من طبقات إجتماعية متوسطة، و مما يلفت النظر هو أن المتطرفين أكثر تفاؤلا على المستوى الشخصي من بقية المشاركين في الاستطلاع، رغم تشاؤمهم على المستوى السياسي والدولي!
تم قياس نسبة التدين بين المتطرفين سياسياً ومقارنتها مع نسبة التدين بين بقية المشاركين لتظهر النتيجة بأن النسبة متقاربة إلى حد كبير وأن المتطرفين سياسياً ليسوا أكثر تديناً مثلا من المعتدلين، أي أن الدين ليس دافعاً للتطرف في هذه الحالة إنما حالة الإحباط السياسي التي يعيشها المسلم.
الفصل الرابع كان حول النساء في العالم الإسلامي، بعنوان ماذا تريد النساء؟
الصورة النمطية تقول بأن النساء مقهورات ومظلومات في العالم الإسلامي وهن ضحايا لنظم اجتماعية وسياسية تمارس تمييزاً ضد المرأة، كان الاستطلاع حول عدد من الأفكار مثل تعليم المرأة وكانت النسبة متفاوتة هنا، فبعض الدول نسبة أمية المرأة فيها عالية مثل اليمن وباكستان مقابل ارتفاع نسبة تعليم المرأة في دولة مثل السعودية وإيران والإمارات، وأيضا حول إعجاب المسلمات بالقيم الغربية، وبالمرأة الغربية، كانت نسبة من النساء المسلمات يؤكدن غياب حقوقهن، لكن هذا لا يعني أنهن يطالبن بحقوق الغربيات فهن يعتقدن بأن المرأة الغربية بلا قيمة ثقافية، أي أن المسلمات كن على وعي بأهمية الحقوق القانونية ويشعرن بأهميتها مع رغبتهن بالإحتفاظ بالقيمة الثقافية للمرأة، الفصل عموما كان جميلاً تطرق لعمل المرأة ونسبة المؤيدين له من الرافضين في بعض الدول، أيضا حق النساء في التصويت والعمل السياسي، نظرة المرأة المسلمة حول المساواة، وعدد من الأمور التي تخص المرأة.
الفصل الخامس كان بعنوان صدام أم تعايش؟ تحدث حول فكرة صراع الحضارات، كان أحد الأسئلة المطروحة هنا هل يعارض المسلمين حرية التعبير؟ وماهي الحساسيات الثقافية بين الغرب والعالم الإسلامي، هل الغرب في حالة حرب مع العالم الإسلامي؟ هل ينظر المسلمون للغرب بصورة واحدة جامدة أم أن صورة فرنسا تختلف عن ألمانيا وصورة أمريكا تختلف عن صورة بريطانيا لدى المسلمين؟
إحدى النتائج هي أن الحالة الراهنة هي نتيجة صراع الجهل لا الحضارات.
كان هناك ملحقان في الكتب الأول حول طريقة تصميم الأسئلة واختيار العينات، والثانية حول رحلة جالوب حول العالم لطرح الأسئلة وجمع الإجابات، بالنسبة للسعودية لم تسمح لهم بدءً بعمل الإستبيان، وبعد جهود حصل أحد أعضاء الفريق على تصريح بالقيام به مع التدخل في تعديل الأسئلة (إلى متى؟).
الكتاب ممتع، ومثير للتفكير في بعض النقاط، جهد جميل من المؤلفين والباحثين، رغم أن الترجمة سيئة
June 30, 2008
A straightforward presentation of the results and the implications of the results from a worldwide Gallup poll of the world's Muslims. I found this book a much-needed counterbalance to the prevailing Islamaphobia in so much of the public discourse of the USA. Among the points that this books makes are: jihad doesn't mean holy war; radical militant Muslims are better educated, richer, and less religious than moderate Muslims; sharia is not inherently anti-democratic or discriminatory; Muslim men and women around the world favor democracy and women's rights and consider that these goals can best be met through a fuller understanding of Islam, rather than by moving towards secularism. In the end, this book presents a picture of terrorism as politically, rather than religiously, motivated and of the abuses of Islamic law as being miscarriages of justice, rather than products of an intrinsically barbaric justice system. I would recommend this book to anyone who is interested in learning about the perspective of actual Muslims around the world.
However, this book is based on a poll, and you know what they say about lies, damn lies, and statistics. So the facts in the book may or may not be considered objectively true, depending on how much you credit polls. I consider it at least as accurate as anecdote, assumption, and the Washington Post-- which is to say, as good as it gets.
However, this book is based on a poll, and you know what they say about lies, damn lies, and statistics. So the facts in the book may or may not be considered objectively true, depending on how much you credit polls. I consider it at least as accurate as anecdote, assumption, and the Washington Post-- which is to say, as good as it gets.
December 19, 2008
"Who Speaks for Islam?" is a gem; just plain simple: You should read it.
The world sees Islam through the most visible actions of the most extreme people, but this is not who we are. Muslims are so diverse and, when looked at scientifically, we are so peaceful, friendly, and very normal.
Numbers are so beautiful, because they tell you the plain truth with no embellishment. This book uses statistics generated by Gallup's World Poll (A global poll by a very renowned polling institute) to identify what we, the normal everyday Muslims, think about different things: How we look towards the west, towards ourselves, towards terrorism, and toward issues. It does it very beautifully in an easy-to-read well researched fashion (Do not expect to see boring unreadable scientific lingo here. It's based on scientific data, but it's totally written in a properly analyzed interesting style).
It starts out by giving a brief introduction about who Muslims are. What do we believe in and do, and what is not really part of Islam. It also addresses the misconception of Jihad as "Holy War"; all of that while citing polling data.
It then addresses very interesting subjects including what makes a person a radical, whether Muslims favor a democracy or a theocracy, what do women Muslims want really, and how Muslims look upon the west and what are their hopes in this regard.
It also in a very interesting way demonstrates that the West and the Islamic world are not real monoliths and that a lot of diversity exists inside each, and towards each. For instance, the way Muslims view the actions of a certain western country may defer than the way they view another's, and the way Muslims perceive a leader of a nation may not exactly match the way they perceive the nation itself.
Other interesting revelations are the comparisons between the views of Americans and those of Muslims. In many religion based issues, it is noteworthy that the results of Americans fall in the same statistical margins in which Muslim's fall (And yet Muslims are said to be more radical). In fact, sometimes, the views of Americans are far more radical (You'll find that 46% of Americans do not believe that acts against civilians are "never justified", making the majority actually accept acts against civilians in some cases; a rate you will not see in Muslim countries).
There is a lot to say about this book, but I guess the best advice to give is: Go read it if you want to learn more about the way real Muslims think, or you are a Muslim who deals often with westerners who may want to learn more about the way real Muslims think.
The world sees Islam through the most visible actions of the most extreme people, but this is not who we are. Muslims are so diverse and, when looked at scientifically, we are so peaceful, friendly, and very normal.
Numbers are so beautiful, because they tell you the plain truth with no embellishment. This book uses statistics generated by Gallup's World Poll (A global poll by a very renowned polling institute) to identify what we, the normal everyday Muslims, think about different things: How we look towards the west, towards ourselves, towards terrorism, and toward issues. It does it very beautifully in an easy-to-read well researched fashion (Do not expect to see boring unreadable scientific lingo here. It's based on scientific data, but it's totally written in a properly analyzed interesting style).
It starts out by giving a brief introduction about who Muslims are. What do we believe in and do, and what is not really part of Islam. It also addresses the misconception of Jihad as "Holy War"; all of that while citing polling data.
It then addresses very interesting subjects including what makes a person a radical, whether Muslims favor a democracy or a theocracy, what do women Muslims want really, and how Muslims look upon the west and what are their hopes in this regard.
It also in a very interesting way demonstrates that the West and the Islamic world are not real monoliths and that a lot of diversity exists inside each, and towards each. For instance, the way Muslims view the actions of a certain western country may defer than the way they view another's, and the way Muslims perceive a leader of a nation may not exactly match the way they perceive the nation itself.
Other interesting revelations are the comparisons between the views of Americans and those of Muslims. In many religion based issues, it is noteworthy that the results of Americans fall in the same statistical margins in which Muslim's fall (And yet Muslims are said to be more radical). In fact, sometimes, the views of Americans are far more radical (You'll find that 46% of Americans do not believe that acts against civilians are "never justified", making the majority actually accept acts against civilians in some cases; a rate you will not see in Muslim countries).
There is a lot to say about this book, but I guess the best advice to give is: Go read it if you want to learn more about the way real Muslims think, or you are a Muslim who deals often with westerners who may want to learn more about the way real Muslims think.
November 9, 2010
I was SO impressed with this book! It is based on the results of a mammoth Gallup Poll research study between 2001 and 2007 which surveyed a sample representing 90% of the world's 1.3 billion Muslims. The survey (conducted through tens of thousands of hour-long, face-to-face interviews)covered such questions as: what Muslims like and/or dislike about the West, how they feel about terrorism and attacks on civilians, their views on women's rights, religion, government and legislation. The responses and the analysis of the survey make for fascinating reading.
Since 9/11 and the attacks on the Twin Towers, there has been so much focus on Western/Muslim conflict with the emphasis in the press on extremist views. It's valuable to read what the majority of Muslims feel about the above-mentioned topics. To me it was, above all, reassuring in that the people surveyed admired the West for its technology and its democratic principles (freedom of speech, human rights, rule of law). Moreover the vast majority opposed terrorism and attacks on civilians.
It was also interesting to read that the authors of the survey (their credentials are impressive) felt that spread of terrorism against the West is not caused by Islam, but by by the perception in the Muslim world that the West (especially the USA) is trying to dominatate their countries. They feel that the USA is not really interested in Muslim self-determination but in bolstering authoritarian regimes in the the Middle East and in promoting its own brand of democracy.
The section on women's issues was riviting. It was interseting to read that Muslim women, while they admire much about the West, do not yearn to be like their Western counterparts. They favour gender parity, but on their terms and within their own cultural context. They do not see the veil as a symbol of inferior status. (On the contrary they view Western women's "immodest" clothing as a sign of their degraded status! - Interesting perspective!) They also feel the Western advocacy of women's issues is an attempt to justify colonialsim and domination.
I could go on and on; there was so much of interest in the book. I would recommend it to anyone who is intersted in reading about the Muslim world and also to those who have concerns about terrorism and the spread of Islam.
Since 9/11 and the attacks on the Twin Towers, there has been so much focus on Western/Muslim conflict with the emphasis in the press on extremist views. It's valuable to read what the majority of Muslims feel about the above-mentioned topics. To me it was, above all, reassuring in that the people surveyed admired the West for its technology and its democratic principles (freedom of speech, human rights, rule of law). Moreover the vast majority opposed terrorism and attacks on civilians.
It was also interesting to read that the authors of the survey (their credentials are impressive) felt that spread of terrorism against the West is not caused by Islam, but by by the perception in the Muslim world that the West (especially the USA) is trying to dominatate their countries. They feel that the USA is not really interested in Muslim self-determination but in bolstering authoritarian regimes in the the Middle East and in promoting its own brand of democracy.
The section on women's issues was riviting. It was interseting to read that Muslim women, while they admire much about the West, do not yearn to be like their Western counterparts. They favour gender parity, but on their terms and within their own cultural context. They do not see the veil as a symbol of inferior status. (On the contrary they view Western women's "immodest" clothing as a sign of their degraded status! - Interesting perspective!) They also feel the Western advocacy of women's issues is an attempt to justify colonialsim and domination.
I could go on and on; there was so much of interest in the book. I would recommend it to anyone who is intersted in reading about the Muslim world and also to those who have concerns about terrorism and the spread of Islam.
June 19, 2015
Results of an exhaustive survey of Muslims throughout the world. 1.6 billion people call themselves "Muslim." According to this study, Muslims are practicing a religion that does not support terrorism.
If you want your prejudices eroded, read this book.
If you want your prejudices eroded, read this book.
October 3, 2008
There are so many books being passed around among my fellow evangelicals these days, the basic theme of which is "Islam is a terrible, hateful religion full of terrorists". This book is refreshing for its careful research and balance.
For example, did you know that 80% of Iranians, 81% of people from Bangladesh, and 86% of Pakistanis say that it is never justifiable to intentionally target innocent civilians in order to achieve political or military ends?
Only 46% of Americans say never; 24% of Americans say attacks on civilians are sometimes or often justified, and 6% say they are completely justified.
Moreover, most Muslims do not hate our way of life or our freedom. They admire freedom of the press, freedom of speech, and our technological advances. What they dislike are our deteriorating family life and casual attitudes towards sex.
(Figures are based on the largest Gallup demographic poll ever launched, between 2001 and 2007. Their sample represents the views of over 90% of Muslims in the world.)
I find this book eye-opening and challenging to my preconceived prejudices.
For example, did you know that 80% of Iranians, 81% of people from Bangladesh, and 86% of Pakistanis say that it is never justifiable to intentionally target innocent civilians in order to achieve political or military ends?
Only 46% of Americans say never; 24% of Americans say attacks on civilians are sometimes or often justified, and 6% say they are completely justified.
Moreover, most Muslims do not hate our way of life or our freedom. They admire freedom of the press, freedom of speech, and our technological advances. What they dislike are our deteriorating family life and casual attitudes towards sex.
(Figures are based on the largest Gallup demographic poll ever launched, between 2001 and 2007. Their sample represents the views of over 90% of Muslims in the world.)
I find this book eye-opening and challenging to my preconceived prejudices.
February 8, 2013
This is definitely worth reading. I learned so much and have a greater respect for Muslims as a whole, and will no longer buy into the prejudices and stereotypes. This book does not try to deny that terrorism exists, but it puts it perspective relative to mainstream Muslims and relative to the Islamic teachings (which do not teach murder and terrorism). For example, the majority of Muslims do not live in Iraq & Afganistan, but whenever we think of Muslims, those are the countries we think of so we assume all Muslims are like them. Only 7% of all Muslims believe terrorism is the answer -- and these studies found that it is for political reasons and that the majority of terrorists are NOT actively religious (they drink, do not say prayers 5 times a day, etc.). Mainstream Muslims hate the terrorists just as much as the rest of the world and suffer more because of them. Much, much more contained in this book, especially talks about political and economic disputes. Very good and definitely a good read!
June 3, 2015
False information, even in quotes, makes it hard to trust the Islamic experts writing this book. When you begin by defining Islam as "a strong commitment to God", (pg.7) instead of by its literal translation: submission and surrender, you already lose my trust. Indeed, if you want to engage in a discussion of what that term means in religious terms, peachy, but be upfront about the naked truth because otherwise you are cooking the data, as it is easy to see that interpretations of that phrase can vary. With that initial red flag, I read Esposito (professor of Islamic Affairs at Georgetown) and Mogahed's work super-closely, checking figures and oh yes, assumptions. Googling the Gallup poll that they draw on for attitudes toward Muslims, I am struck by the small sample of that poll: 808 people. This is something which Mogahed, a Director of Islamic Polls at Gallup should have taken with a grain of salt, should have been more upfront about. Other bikini polls are usually around 2,000 respondent. A surprising assertion in chapter 2, that cried for clarification was the comparison between Muslims and Americans' desire for religion to influence law. The book says that 46 percent of Americans think the Bible should be a source of legislation. This is put there to show that Christian Americans are just as 'nutty' as Muslims, I think. Now if you follow that footnote, 41, to the Gallup indicated you are not led to a discussion of religion in America, only to the original poll on attitudes towards Muslims. Fortunately for me, I can Google those exact words and see that a later 2007 poll does does have those numbers and words. A footnote mistake surely. I think its fair for the book to bring up religion as a source of law for a culture. Most societies base their law at least partly on religion, a fact that we forget. This is a meaningful discussion that the book completely misses and I would have loved to see developed. However, the book does not closely look at the one statistically significant difference in that other poll. It says: 46 percent of Americans think the Bible should be a source of law "but not the only source" compared with 23 percent of Muslims who think Sharia should not be the only source. That's a bit of a difference statistically, but if you are unintentionally cooking the facts probably not one to bring up or have people look at. And again, I empathize with their problem. You can't prove anything from two different polls that compare one country to several and that compare such differently compiled religious texts (the bible reflects an oral tradition that stopped being compiled around the first century, whereas Sharia, depending who you ask reflects an evolving study of law upto the present). I think this book is written from a perspective, which does not let deep thinking or unruly facts get in the way, but hey at least it starts from something we can ascertain the truth of: facts. Now I do get this undercurrent of political partisanship, when the only president discussed is W. Bush and his support of less democratically minded rulers in the Islamic world, but the author could be excused because he was focused on writing about a precise moment in the American/Islamic interaction. They are just not thinking how others will read it. Same for the discussion of the neocon Francis Fukuyama's comments that Democracy has its roots in countries with a secularized Christianity. It is fair to note that he is an avowed neocon, but it would also be a good thing to look at his specialty, the study of democracy, and note that even Gallup concludes that all the countries interviewed want democracy, "except 10", (pg. 58). So no, despite the helpful bullet points at the end of chapter 3, no they didn't prove at all that Islamic countries want democracy. I did appreciate the nugget that the majority of people holding a radical view of Islam, were interviewed in Asian countries and not in the Arab Street. Food for thought. And I appreciated the passages from the Koran where Muhammed calls for toleration of non-muslims, but respectfully decline to take their word that most Muslims believe that this must translate to peace. Early Muslim texts are historical we are told by muslim experts, even if they describe battles, we are told. Fine, but you can't have it both ways. A better way of ascertaining how Muslims ideally interpret those texts is through works of religious exegesis, just as it is with other religions. Again, the authors are not analyzing deeply. In looking at the chapter on women, I tend to agree with Muslims, if not exactly these authors, that the radical position is the American feminist one. Muslim women are perfectly free in western worlds to veil or not, only bound by family ties as thong wearing westerns. Their desire for modesty is not a sign of oppression, even I would say in those countries that enforce it by law. We rarely hear stories of moderation in law I'm sure. I join Muslim women in rolling my eyes at near-naked American women carping about exploitation. It was interesting to read about the stir made by Pope Benedict's comments, calling for Muslims to embrace peace, but I was surprised no mention was made of those Muslims who defended the Pope's words like scholar Ahmad Vincenzo: "We totally agree with Benedict that it is not possible to advance dialogue between religions that plays down the specific doctrines and rituals of individual faiths." Well, maybe I'm not surprised. The Coexistence chapter, had me cracking up. Obviously, Muslims are annoyed by the idiotic coexist car bumper stickers as I am. They really reflect a simplistic position that religion alone is the cause of war, which flies in the face of a lot of history and a lot of better-informed books by atheist-evangelists. For the record, here I tend to agree with the authors of his book and the atheist historians that religion in general is not the cause of war, I just don't think they prove it about Islam at all in this book. (And I reserve judgement on other less tangible things like culture for sure.) I still don't know what the nugget source of that terrorism is, other than evil, but I haven't given up finding out.
March 29, 2009
I plan to re-read this book as soon as possible and then write a proper review. Until then, I will say this book is AMAZING. Instead of merely anectodal experiences from my time in the Middle East, I now am armed with facts and intelligent analysis about the beautiful religion of Islam, so often misunderstood and even feared. I wish I had enough money to purchase this book as a gift for all our family and friends! As Americans, we have an important duty to overcome our ignorance and learn about the billion Muslims in the world. Read it.
March 19, 2025
This book provide the insights of what the majority of Muslims around the world actually think and feel about Islam as their way of life which often been misinterpreted in the Western media propaganda hence the rise of the Islamophobia after the September 11th. The word Jihad has often been misused as meant to launch terror attack by the so called Islamic terrorist, which it's actual meaning is 'struggle to earn the pleasure of God' as in to become a devote Muslim in daily prayers and does not specifically in the means of suicide bombings because such things and killing the innocents are considered forbidden in Islam itself. The book answers both ways on Why the West hates Islam and Why the Muslim seems to be anti-West/America. While many western feminists wishes to liberate the Muslim women from oppression as they sees it, however majority Muslim women living in Conservative Muslim countries such as Saudi Arabia and Egypt are pretty much content with their way of life and does not wish it to change as according to them though they appreciate the freedom and gender equality coming from America however they do not welcome the promiscuity and degradation of women. The book also discuss on the double standard when it comes to human rights and freedom of speech according to the West's definition depending on what religion and which part of the world you're in.
February 14, 2022
Based on the biggest social research globally by Gallup, the book after 9/11 "Who Speaks for Islam?" went to explore the overlook impact on the Muslim world created by the west. Gallup posed questions the inhabitants of more than 35 nations across the globe and preserved data to find the gap between Islamic world and the west. Surprisingly this massive finding gives us the clear evidence how the west is obsessed by Islamophobia. Does Islam promote violence? Who are the real propagandists? How political tools are used to discredits Islam? Do Muslims hate the west or it's foreign policy? Do women in Islam have freedom of rights according to her faith? A lot more to dig out in the book ultimately educates one on how the western foreign policy and media misrepresentation on Islam pollute many minds being an Islamophobic while the truth simply is the opposite made the book an insightful reading.
November 1, 2011
الكتاب عبارة عن عرض لإحصائيات أقيمت في أكثر البلدان الإسلامية.
لا أعلم كيف أقيم الكتاب كونه
- موجه لشريحة أخرى تجهل تماما أغلب ما أعلمه مسبقا
- استخدام الأسلوب الإحصائي الرقمي في عرضه والذي أجده مناسب جدا للغرب
بمعنى .. أنك تعلم أغلب ما كتب في الكتاب من معلومات كونها تعبر عن رأي العالم العربي والإسلامي أجمع
أجده مفيد للكل لكنه أكثر فائدة لمن يقطن في أحد البلاد الغربية ويدخل في نقاشات حول الإرهاب و تهميش الإسلام للمرأة. كذلك أجده مفيد كمرجع للبحوث الدارسة لنظرة المسلمين للغرب والعكس صحيح.
لا أعلم كيف أقيم الكتاب كونه
- موجه لشريحة أخرى تجهل تماما أغلب ما أعلمه مسبقا
- استخدام الأسلوب الإحصائي الرقمي في عرضه والذي أجده مناسب جدا للغرب
بمعنى .. أنك تعلم أغلب ما كتب في الكتاب من معلومات كونها تعبر عن رأي العالم العربي والإسلامي أجمع
أجده مفيد للكل لكنه أكثر فائدة لمن يقطن في أحد البلاد الغربية ويدخل في نقاشات حول الإرهاب و تهميش الإسلام للمرأة. كذلك أجده مفيد كمرجع للبحوث الدارسة لنظرة المسلمين للغرب والعكس صحيح.
November 13, 2011
Useful teaching tool for an intro-level college course on Islam/the Muslim world. I assigned chapters from this text to my Intro to Political Islam students this semester -- most found the writing accessible and the poll data thought-provoking.
October 25, 2013
Meh. Great in theory, but I wanted this to be a lot better. And a lot less 3rd grade.
October 19, 2021
Very, very eye-opening look at the real opinions of mainstream Muslims around the time of 9/11. At the very time George W Bush was asking the question, "Why do they hate us?" And answering, "They hate our freedoms," Muslims all over the world were answering survey questions and indicating that the thing they admired most about the US was our freedoms.
Book is a bit dry inherently as a summary of survey results, but hugely informative.
Book is a bit dry inherently as a summary of survey results, but hugely informative.
Read
February 11, 2023Informative!
August 6, 2016
(Read 7/2008; review edited and reposted 12/2013)
This book has its virtues. It provides a helpful overview of Muslim denominations and the history of western/Islamic relations. It reminds the western reader that Islam is not a monolith and dispels the myth that inside every Muslim is an American dying to get out. It cautions westerners that if they hope to improve the lives of Muslims, reform should be promoted within an Islamic framework, since Muslims may resist changes that seem to imply Western cultural superiority. And it reminds liberals who are concerned about how Americans appear to Muslims that the number one thing Muslims dislike about us is our sexual liberalism.
Now onto my difficulties with the book…
The message Esposito and Mogahed ultimately communicate is this: stop being such and Islamaphobic bigot. Stop suggesting that fanaticism is a bigger problem in modern Islam than it is in modern Judaism or Christianity. It’s not. To prove their point, they use a set of Gallup Poll data that is not available to the public for examination. (That's okay. They'll be happy to interpret it for you.) Yet for a book on polls, "Who Speaks for Islam?" contains a surprisingly limited number of raw statistics. The most frequently used word in the book is the vague "many." Sometimes the authors will make a statement and then support it not by reference to the Gallup poll, but by reference to a single anecdote. When the data is contradictory, they don't notice or comment.
What we really need to comprehend, the authors tell us, is that Muslim reactions are the result of a Western lack of respect for Islam, and Muslim actions have to be "understood in context." When, for instance, the Pope makes a negative statement about Islam, and a number of Muslims in several different countries react by beating Christians and setting their churches on fire, those beatings and burnings are the fault of the Pope's insensitivity, and not any reflection whatsoever on the state of the Islamic religion today. When a cartoonist ridicules the Prophet, and a number of Muslims react by setting cars on fire and damaging property and calling for deaths, we have to understand that the vandalism and destruction is the fault of western rudeness, and not any reflection whatsoever on the state of the Isalmic religion today.
Esposito and Mogahed offer the reader’s this reassurance: only 100 million of the world’s Muslims are “radicalized.” Only 100 million think the 9/11 attacks were “completely” justified. The rest are moderate. (The book speaks of this "silenced" moderate majority, but if the moderates are "silenced," they aren't "speaking" for Islam, are they? ) However, it’s somewhat unclear how the authors are defining “moderate.” They never give a concrete, descriptive definition. Nevertheless, it's clear from piecing together the scattered information that a "moderate" can potentially include any of the following: a Muslim who wants to see the imposition of sharia law; a Muslim who believes women should not have equal legal rights as men; a Muslim who believes suicide bombings of civilians is justified, or a Muslim who believes the 9/11 attacks were "partially justified." When the term “moderate” is applied to a Christian or Jew, it typically means something quite different. How many Muslims fit a more moderate definition of moderate? That would have been an interesting question for the authors to answer, but they don’t.
The authors make some surprising claims about Christians, such as this remarkable accusation: "The vast majority of terrorist attacks on U.S. soil have been perpetrated by Christian terrorist groups in the past 15 years." I had hoped they would name these Christian terrorist “groups" who had committed “the vast majority” of “terrorist attacks,” because I wasn’t familiar with them, but they don’t. In fact, the only name they mention at all is and individual, Timothy McVeigh, whom they classify as a "Christian terrorist," despite the fact that he never committed his acts in the name of Christ, never claimed to be motivated by religion, and described himself as an "agnostic," telling his friends, "Science is my religion."
How does one explain the occasional problem of honor killings, genital mutilations, filmmaker stabbings, suicide bombings, or airplanes flying into office buildings? I'm not sure, but from reading this book, I think it has something to do with the fact that Americans are all a bunch of arrogant, smug, small-minded meddlers, and if we would just stop criticizing Islam and instead start miraculously fixing the economic infrastructures of all Muslim countries without, at the same time, interfering in the internal affairs of Islamic states, we wouldn't have to worry about such things.
This book has its virtues. It provides a helpful overview of Muslim denominations and the history of western/Islamic relations. It reminds the western reader that Islam is not a monolith and dispels the myth that inside every Muslim is an American dying to get out. It cautions westerners that if they hope to improve the lives of Muslims, reform should be promoted within an Islamic framework, since Muslims may resist changes that seem to imply Western cultural superiority. And it reminds liberals who are concerned about how Americans appear to Muslims that the number one thing Muslims dislike about us is our sexual liberalism.
Now onto my difficulties with the book…
The message Esposito and Mogahed ultimately communicate is this: stop being such and Islamaphobic bigot. Stop suggesting that fanaticism is a bigger problem in modern Islam than it is in modern Judaism or Christianity. It’s not. To prove their point, they use a set of Gallup Poll data that is not available to the public for examination. (That's okay. They'll be happy to interpret it for you.) Yet for a book on polls, "Who Speaks for Islam?" contains a surprisingly limited number of raw statistics. The most frequently used word in the book is the vague "many." Sometimes the authors will make a statement and then support it not by reference to the Gallup poll, but by reference to a single anecdote. When the data is contradictory, they don't notice or comment.
What we really need to comprehend, the authors tell us, is that Muslim reactions are the result of a Western lack of respect for Islam, and Muslim actions have to be "understood in context." When, for instance, the Pope makes a negative statement about Islam, and a number of Muslims in several different countries react by beating Christians and setting their churches on fire, those beatings and burnings are the fault of the Pope's insensitivity, and not any reflection whatsoever on the state of the Islamic religion today. When a cartoonist ridicules the Prophet, and a number of Muslims react by setting cars on fire and damaging property and calling for deaths, we have to understand that the vandalism and destruction is the fault of western rudeness, and not any reflection whatsoever on the state of the Isalmic religion today.
Esposito and Mogahed offer the reader’s this reassurance: only 100 million of the world’s Muslims are “radicalized.” Only 100 million think the 9/11 attacks were “completely” justified. The rest are moderate. (The book speaks of this "silenced" moderate majority, but if the moderates are "silenced," they aren't "speaking" for Islam, are they? ) However, it’s somewhat unclear how the authors are defining “moderate.” They never give a concrete, descriptive definition. Nevertheless, it's clear from piecing together the scattered information that a "moderate" can potentially include any of the following: a Muslim who wants to see the imposition of sharia law; a Muslim who believes women should not have equal legal rights as men; a Muslim who believes suicide bombings of civilians is justified, or a Muslim who believes the 9/11 attacks were "partially justified." When the term “moderate” is applied to a Christian or Jew, it typically means something quite different. How many Muslims fit a more moderate definition of moderate? That would have been an interesting question for the authors to answer, but they don’t.
The authors make some surprising claims about Christians, such as this remarkable accusation: "The vast majority of terrorist attacks on U.S. soil have been perpetrated by Christian terrorist groups in the past 15 years." I had hoped they would name these Christian terrorist “groups" who had committed “the vast majority” of “terrorist attacks,” because I wasn’t familiar with them, but they don’t. In fact, the only name they mention at all is and individual, Timothy McVeigh, whom they classify as a "Christian terrorist," despite the fact that he never committed his acts in the name of Christ, never claimed to be motivated by religion, and described himself as an "agnostic," telling his friends, "Science is my religion."
How does one explain the occasional problem of honor killings, genital mutilations, filmmaker stabbings, suicide bombings, or airplanes flying into office buildings? I'm not sure, but from reading this book, I think it has something to do with the fact that Americans are all a bunch of arrogant, smug, small-minded meddlers, and if we would just stop criticizing Islam and instead start miraculously fixing the economic infrastructures of all Muslim countries without, at the same time, interfering in the internal affairs of Islamic states, we wouldn't have to worry about such things.
July 23, 2010
So far a lot of this is common sense stuff. The surveys from different countries are very interesting, and the explanation of the array of factions regarding Islam is interesting as well. The bit about Jihad seems to be speaking to an audience that would otherwise be convinced that the Koran/Islam/Jihad are totally violent, but this section serves a purpose regarding the different interpretations of the meaning of Jihad. The book also highlightes passages that are often taken out of context of the Koran for specific purposes and political purposes.
Finished. It got a bit repeititive near the end, but I think it was emphasis not repetition that was the intention. I have tutored refugee immigrants, many muslims, who solidified my esteeemed view of their religion before reading this text, but it was a welcome addition to my criteria of knowledge about the Islamic religion.
Finished. It got a bit repeititive near the end, but I think it was emphasis not repetition that was the intention. I have tutored refugee immigrants, many muslims, who solidified my esteeemed view of their religion before reading this text, but it was a welcome addition to my criteria of knowledge about the Islamic religion.
January 31, 2016
This book is wonderful!!!! Unfortunately it's not terribly current because it was written while George W Bush was still the president and before the 'Arab Spring' however it's still completely applicable.
This book is great for people with little to no knowledge of Islam but is also an interesting read for those with background in the subject. It is mainly an analysis of the largest survey of Muslims world wide (from when it was published, there's been another larger since), and is pretty eye opening.
I don't necessarily agree with all the interpretations the authors made with the statistics but it was still one of the best books I've read on the subject.
This book is great for people with little to no knowledge of Islam but is also an interesting read for those with background in the subject. It is mainly an analysis of the largest survey of Muslims world wide (from when it was published, there's been another larger since), and is pretty eye opening.
I don't necessarily agree with all the interpretations the authors made with the statistics but it was still one of the best books I've read on the subject.
July 28, 2017
Unfortunately, Who Speaks For Islam? had little to say in such an important conversation.
Many topics were not covered with enough depth, and a number of poll results were interpreted in a manner that didn't seem to fit the data itself.
I admire Gallup's initiative to conduct such a comprehensive poll. It is so important that the quieter voices are heard.
Many topics were not covered with enough depth, and a number of poll results were interpreted in a manner that didn't seem to fit the data itself.
I admire Gallup's initiative to conduct such a comprehensive poll. It is so important that the quieter voices are heard.
September 7, 2014
كتاب رائع.. وكلمة رائع قليلة عليه. سأعود للكتابة بالتفصيل عنه في تدوينة في مدونتي.
February 4, 2014
Fascinating combo of helpful information and misrepresentation. Causality is both implied and ignored where it shouldn't be. Causality/purpose/result missing, confused, undifferentiated.
November 18, 2014
A nice report on a worldwide research on Islam, in particular on what people think about Islam
September 17, 2023
Read this book sophomore year of college for a class on intro principles of Islam. I loved this book for a few reasons. One because it was very comprehensive in addressing any questions someone who is doesn’t know anything other than stereotypes about the religion and its people. Like most folk from butt fuck Central Jersey, my scope of Islam was quite limited. The 2nd reason is that the book is mostly based around Gallop poles asking questions to the world of Islam. The book is mostly poll driven and acts more of a source of data than anything else. The book goes in depth to attempt to explain how the world of Islam thinks and doesn’t pad its findings with any opinions from the author. It largely leaves the reader to digest the findings on their own, worts and all.
I found what I read to be very eye opening primarily because as the title suggests, those who speak for Islam do not represent the entire religion. Islam is one of the worlds most populous religions and has followers from Indonesia to India to the US, all of which grasp the belief system in their own unique way. Who speaks for Islam is an impossibly large question. Some of the things I found did deter me away from the religions belief systems, largely surrounded the treatment of women. I was quite shocked at the number of people who voted against the fair treatment of women in some of the counties poles. However other things went much deeper than I had ever considered and brought a breath of perspective to something I otherwise knew nothing about. One of the few books I decided to hang on to after school!
I found what I read to be very eye opening primarily because as the title suggests, those who speak for Islam do not represent the entire religion. Islam is one of the worlds most populous religions and has followers from Indonesia to India to the US, all of which grasp the belief system in their own unique way. Who speaks for Islam is an impossibly large question. Some of the things I found did deter me away from the religions belief systems, largely surrounded the treatment of women. I was quite shocked at the number of people who voted against the fair treatment of women in some of the counties poles. However other things went much deeper than I had ever considered and brought a breath of perspective to something I otherwise knew nothing about. One of the few books I decided to hang on to after school!
July 21, 2017
This is an excellent and concise book that blasts through numerous myths and misconceptions about Islam, Muslims, and the Muslim world as a whole. For a layperson, this is the perfect place to start to understand the global issues that are attached to the Muslim world, as well as the threat of international terrorism. I found the statistics especially impressive, and the whole thing extremely easy to understand.
My only critique is that the data at this point is about ten years old; while it gives an excellent snapshot of the immediate post-9/11 years, I would be interested in seeing an updated version or a sequel to see what the data says in 2017 (and perhaps there is one, but it's not in this particular version). I also experienced an element of sadness, in that the current U.S. administration is not heeding any of the recommendations put forth by this book, and are instead racing in the other direction – all but guaranteeing the West vs. Muslim world split will widen, and extremist groups will have myriad opportunities to use American policy blunders to fuel their propaganda.
My only critique is that the data at this point is about ten years old; while it gives an excellent snapshot of the immediate post-9/11 years, I would be interested in seeing an updated version or a sequel to see what the data says in 2017 (and perhaps there is one, but it's not in this particular version). I also experienced an element of sadness, in that the current U.S. administration is not heeding any of the recommendations put forth by this book, and are instead racing in the other direction – all but guaranteeing the West vs. Muslim world split will widen, and extremist groups will have myriad opportunities to use American policy blunders to fuel their propaganda.
February 6, 2019
An assumption shattering read. This fascinating book explores the depths of assumptions about "what Muslims believe" by getting answers from the very people who live in Muslim majority countries. Instead of what many Americans may believe, the majority support democracy, opportunities and rights for women, and the more religious someone is, the less likely they are to support terrorism. However, a lack of basic resources and international interference leading to a lack of autonomy (and sometimes interfering with democracy) often gets in the way. Think this is an extremely important book for anyone who wants to discuss this topic.
December 8, 2016
This is a wonderful source of factual, and often surprising, information. It shows much more clearly what is going on in Islam and how it is both the same and different in different parts of the world. The book is easy to read and is well worth it. Especially interesting is information on how Muslim women feel in different countries. There are issues but not always the ones that we imagine. There is so much unsupported opinion going around that it is refreshing to see a book built on facts along with the numbers to back them up.
October 21, 2017
Esposito and Mogahed grapple with contemporary beliefs and opinions centered on global perceptions on Islam and Muslims. This is a very accessible text that everyone should spend some time with. The data collection generated by Gallup really hits hard at the underlying biases many in the West hold about our Muslim neighbors.
November 27, 2018
Who Speaks For Islam?: What a Billion Muslims Really Think (Hardcover)
by John L. Esposito AND Dalia Mogahed
ordered from the library Nov27
heard DM on TEDnpr.org https://www.npr.org/templates/transcr...
https://www.ispu.org/dalia-mogahed/
https://www.ispu.org/staff/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dalia_M...
by John L. Esposito AND Dalia Mogahed
ordered from the library Nov27
heard DM on TEDnpr.org https://www.npr.org/templates/transcr...
https://www.ispu.org/dalia-mogahed/
https://www.ispu.org/staff/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dalia_M...
August 7, 2018
Good info, though a bit dryly presented. I wish more Americans would read this book in order to have a better idea of what most Muslims really think. There is some good food for thought here that cuts through the stereotypical media presentations. Read on iPad.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 99 reviews