What do you think?
Rate this book


224 pages, Paperback
First published July 2, 2008













I've been reading Batman R.I.P. for all of ten minutes and I already hate it
Jesus Christ I hate it so much what is this
This is the biggest bullshit casserole I've ever been presented with, I'm serious
Tim is literally the only person in character how is this possible. How do you even fuck up this badly
I'm just flabbergasted. How did this even make it to print? How did anyone look at this and say "yeah. Okay. This seems representative of the Batman franchise. Go for it"
On a scale of 1 to Batman R.I.P. how conceptually misguided and out of character is your fan fiction
So do editors even exist in the comic book industry or is it all just neckbearded manchildren masturbating onto expensive paper and congratulating one another on it
I mean it's one thing to just throw character consistency out the window but like…
Do you people even like Batman
Because no one who likes Batman would be seen within 10 miles of Batman R.I.P.
Batman R.I.P. is literally a marathon of insanity. I don’t know what’s happening and I don’t know why and I really don’t even care anymore. Everything is Grant Morrison using big words to obscure the glaringly obvious fact that he couldn’t write a fucking fortune cookie if his life depended on it, very less string together a coherent narrative starring one of the most iconic characters in Western fiction


Batman: R.I.P. by Grant Morrison
Batman: R.I.P. is the centerpiece of Grant Morrison's long run on the character. It collects Batman #676-681 (2008) and sets out to break Bruce Wayne down before rebuilding what a Batman can be. It is dense, unsettling, and deliberately disorienting, and it is one of the most polarizing Batman stories of its era.
A secret organization called the Black Glove, led by the sinister Dr. Simon Hurt, sets out to destroy Batman. It attacks his allies, his sanity, and his sense of self rather than his body, and it draws on his most closely guarded secrets. Alongside this campaign are Bruce's relationship with the alluring Jezebel Jet, the reappearance of the international Club of Heroes, and a growing sense that reality around him is coming apart. The story doubles as a psychological horror piece and a meditation on what makes a man the Batman.
Morrison writes in a fragmented, nonlinear style, and he leans hard on Batman's whole publication history, from the silliest Silver Age oddities to the grimmest modern portrayals. He treats them all as one continuous life, and the result is a Batman who feels both mythic and haunted. Tony Daniel's art is sharp and kinetic, with dramatic layouts and a polished superhero look that keeps the more abstract sequences readable. The artwork is more conventional than the script, and that contrast helps ground the story.
Strengths
Ambition. Few Batman stories try to do this much. It examines his psychology, his mortality, and the price of being the Batman, all while telling a tense, high-stakes thriller.
Atmosphere. The paranoia is well sustained. The reader is never sure what is real, and that instability mirrors what Bruce himself is experiencing.
Villains. Dr. Hurt is a chilling antagonist because he works through insinuation rather than brute force. The Joker also appears and is well used.
Rewards for the invested. Readers who know Batman's history will find layers of references and callbacks that deepen the story.
Weaknesses
Accessibility. This is not a good starting point. It builds directly on earlier issues of Morrison's run, and newcomers may struggle to follow the plot and characters.
Confusing structure. The narrative is deliberately cryptic and jumps around, and some readers will find it obscure rather than clever. Several plot points and the ending are open to interpretation.
An unresolved conclusion. The story leaves major questions hanging and hands off to other titles, so it does not stand entirely on its own.
Plot Notes
Verdict
A challenging, atmospheric, and often brilliant Batman story that rewards patience and prior knowledge. It is demanding and occasionally opaque, but it is memorable for how boldly it rethinks the character.
Rating: 4 out of 5 stars