Johnathan Kozol’s The Shame of the Nation presents a portrait of present-day educational inequities that is certain to be incredibly intriguing and thought-provoking, especially for those unacquainted with the realities of urban public schools. Kozol examines the physical conditions, teaching, curriculum, and students in urban schools where nearly all of the children are African-American or Hispanic. The book chronicles visits to schools in which students are faced with material deficiencies that would indisputably be considered an outrage in many wealthier districts. Overcrowded classrooms without enough chairs, lead paint, rat infestations, and other health hazards, and science labs devoid of any supplies all overwhelmingly support Kozol’s assertion that these schools are in no way equal to many of the institutions that white students attend. The book also proceeds to investigate teaching trends, finding that standardized high stakes testing and pressures for schools to improve their test scores have resulted in curriculum and instruction that is so standardized, regimented, and focused on producing tangible results that there is little focus on independent exploration, discovery, or fun. Another especially insightful portion of the book discusses “school-to-work”, an increasingly popular education paradigm in urban schools which mainly views schooling as a method to prepare students for future jobs. Most readers will agree that the practices observed by Kozol in these schools are a far cry from a traditional elementary school education. “Help wanted” signs are posted around many schools, prompting children must “apply” for classroom jobs, students are presented with “earnings charts” which describe how much their academic tasks are “worth”, and students sign “contracts” agreeing to complete their assignments. Kozol reveals that even in high school, “career preparation” tracks are marketed so aggressively that many students abandon their ambitions to take advanced-level coursework.
Kozol received a degree in English literature from Harvard, and, despite having no plans to work in education, was motivated to become a volunteer teacher at a “freedom school” in Boston during the height of the civil rights movement in 1964. He then became a fourth grade teacher in a Boston school, which, like many of the other urban schools chronicled in the book, struggled with antiquated disciplinary practices, physical disrepair, and a low teacher retention rate. After teaching for more than a decade, he began visiting schools in other parts of the nation, noting the gradual changes that occurred as once-integrated school districts increasingly resegregated themselves as the Brown decision was partially dismantled. Since Kozol worked as a teacher in an urban school, he is clearly qualified to discuss the issues present in the schools he’s visited and to make In this way, he effectively distances himself from news media, politicians, or administrators, who might excessively criticize schools or teachers without actually experiencing them firsthand, and demonstrates that he has an intimate understanding of how schools operate and where problems lie. It’s also evident that he has gone to great lengths to deliver objective portraits of the schools he has visited; he emphasizes how he not only observed schools and classes themselves, but also had discussions with students, parents, teachers, and school administrators. This reinforces the notion that Kozol is not simply criticizing schools based on superficial qualities like physical appearance or brief classroom observations, but has rather gone to significant lengths to develop a well-rounded portrait of each school and its surrounding community.
Kozol must be commended for reporting on all these schools in a seemingly objective manner and without excessively sensationalized descriptions often found in news articles describing the “crisis” of America’s education system. However, the reader is left to wonder whether his detailed descriptions of schools’ physical conditions really provide much meaningful insight into students’ experiences. This is not to say that the physical condition of a school has no bearing on the attitudes of the students that attend it, as it certainly does, but when Kozol presents anecdotes about how he observed rats in one school or broken windows in another, it is often unclear how widespread these issues are, and even if he implies that they are widespread, little supporting evidence is presented to reinforce this notion. Kozol’s discussion of teaching and curriculum, on the other hand, is indisputably very effective in demonstrating the vast inequities of America’s education system. The prevalence in inner-city schools of the idea that children are an “investment”, and, if educated properly, can produce a financial return by becoming productive workers, is demonstrated very well. This, along with “school-to-work” curriculum, shows that funding and physical differences aside, urban schools serving primarily black and Hispanic children essentially predetermine the careers of their students by assuming that most students are destined to enter the workforce instead of attending college.
Kozol presents much evidence to support that teachers’ time in urban schools is essentially dominated by regimented learning that seeks to develop skills efficiently and maximize test scores. However, the book falls short of suggesting a method to resolve the issue of “teaching to the test” while still having tests that can be used to measure students’ abilities and performance. At times, Kozol seems to ignore the fact that some sort of test-based quantitative data on students’ academic performance is typically necessary to identify underperforming schools and investigate the effects of changes in curriculum changes. While it is evident that excessive pressure to increase test scores had negative effects on instruction at schools mentioned in the book, the question of how to still measure students’ performance while avoiding these effects is not discussed. It sometimes seems as though Kozol regards segregation of urban schools as the root cause of many of these issues, but it is hard to believe that all testing-related difficulties would cease to exist if urban schools became integrated.
As a high school student who attends a rural public school, I had never experienced firsthand nor even heard about many of the problems described in this book. In history courses that I’ve taken (such as AP US History, for example) the Brown vs. Board of Education ruling is often regarded as a definitive end to school segregation in America, and likewise, there isn’t much discussion of how schools began to turn back towards segregation in subsequent decades. Thus, reading this book was a very eye-opening experience, since I had never truly been aware of the extent of segregation in our modern-day public schools. I also became much more aware of how the media can often misrepresent the problems abound in urban schools by focusing excessively on test scores while ignoring many factors like curriculum and teaching.
Overall, The Shame of the Nation has allowed me to realize how I’ve taken so many aspects of my public school education for granted. The ability to take AP courses, a school building free of health hazards, and a classroom atmosphere that generally prioritizes academic exploration and discovery over strictly regimented skill-based learning are all things which many privileged students might assume are present at all schools, but Kozol demonstrates that this is clearly not the case. Though the book may be somewhat repetitive and generally spends more time exposing problems than discussing potential solutions, it has certainly caused me to feel quite ashamed that in a country that is often presumed to be a beacon of hope and equality, I am lucky enough to enjoy a first-rate public education while minorities in cities are systematically denied the same thing.