In a contemplative essay that develops a parallel between void, space, time, and the science of vision in Laotzu's philosophy and in modern architecture, Amos Ih Tiao Chang reveals the vitality of intangible, or negative, elements. He writes that these qualities make architectonic forms "come alive, become human, naturally harmonize with one another, and enable us to experience them with human sensibility."
The author expands Frank Lloyd Wright's thoughts on the affinity between Laotzu's philosophy and modern Western architecture by discussing "Natural Life-Movement in Architectonic Vision," "Variability and Complement," "Balance and Equilibrium," and "Individuality and Unity." He accompanies his text with architectural drawings and four Chinese paintings.
The point of this book is theoretic and expansive critical thinking. If you are looking for tangible, literal examples and concrete understanding; you will feel as though this book is "lacking". For those of us that think abstractly, in images and understand the beauty of architectural theory. This is an essential. It'll help to bridge the gaps between idea, understanding and application, and give more backbone to your designs and conceptual developments.
I read it because I had to do a paper on this exact subject. It was packed with facts and examples. I really enjoyed it and I liked the authors interpretation of how the philosophy of Daoism can inspire architects.
the irony of describing the indescribable... a lot of it felt repetitive, but maybe that was the point- the conclusion was my favorite part, maybe that should've been the substance of the text instead
"Art is artifact that grows" "... if knowledge itself is utilized at the conscious state to frame and mould the form envisioned, it should be fused with creative forgetfulness"
Very abstract. A cool read and interesting application of Lao Tzu's thought, but would have been helpful to have specific examples rather than abstract explanation sometimes. Also it would have been nice to know a little more about Lao Tzu, although Amos gave a good brief introduction