This book wasn't what I was expecting or what I had wanted, and yet it turned out to be something wonderful all of its own, and something I'm very glad to have read. I've wanted to read something on the history, folklore, and rituals around Kannon Bodhisattva, something in the vein of Jan Chozen Bays book on Mizo. This book does include all those things, but in a much less academic way. Blofeld cites no sources and says that the stories he tells are told as well as he remembers, or "in the spirit" of the originals. He also makes assumptions on the origins of Quan Yin and how she developed from Avalokiteshvara due to things "feeling" right, not a reasoning any academic would accept. But if you accept that this isn't about academic facts and is instead about the non-rational you'll get a lot out of it. One of Blofeld's major points is that we in the west have often looked at how people in Eastern countries practice Buddhism and judged it based on our own ideas of what's rational and what isn't, and without fully seeing how the practitioners actually see what they're doing. We see "just sitting" as logical and the idea of rebirth in Pure Lands due to chanting of mantras as not logical. Yet both koans and visualizing incredibly complex images of Buddhas and lotuses have the same goal and work similarly. Blofeld writes, "Do not fall into the trap of making distinctions that are meaningful only at a very superficial level. Chan, Pure Land, and Vajrayana are not three paths to the same goal, but three gateways to the same path, or even one gateway seen in various lights." The quotes he gives from practitioners bear this out, with multiple people trying to explain to him that Quan Yin and Pure Lands are real AND exist within our minds. Dualities are often a trap in Buddhism. If everything is from mind, then why wouldn't Quan Yin be as real as a tree, or as an abstract notion like justice? Words can't explain things that are beyond the range of conceptual thoughts. As someone who is both attracted to and uncomfortable with devotional practices this was an important read. I'd recommend it to those interested in Quan Yin, of course, but also to western Buddhists who might look down on what they see as less logical practices, or practices that they don't see as aligning with what they see as Shakyamuni's teachings. Often dualism strikes even when we think we've escaped that trap.