I really enjoyed Wilcock's exposition of Revelation when I read it two years ago, and after rereading Luke and falling in love with this particular Gospel, I was excited to dig into Wilcock's treatment of it. I thought the introduction was slightly odd in tone and I wasn't at first sure where he was going to go with it, but he quickly hit his stride. One of the things I appreciated in this study of the book is how it brought to the forefront of my mind the fact that Luke accompanied Paul on some of his missionary journeys, clearly knew Paul well, and ministered with Paul in the spread of the gospel to Gentile communities. Wilcock presents Luke as the quintessential evangelist of the gospel-to-the-nations, presenting Jesus as the Savior/Healer (he underscores the dual meaning of the same word in Greek) of the world, and it is striking how Pauline Luke's theology is. Not that any part of the New Testament is at odds with any other, but in this read through I was constantly struck by connections to passages in Paul's letters. E.g., Luke recounts Jesus saying repeatedly that there is nothing hidden that will not eventually be revealed, a comment that reminded me of Paul's description of "the mystery hidden for ages and generations but now revealed to his saints" (Colossians, the letter in which Paul names Luke as one of those sending greetings alongside him to the recipients!).
Wilcock's exposition, like his exposition of Revelations, emphasizes the deep Old Testament roots of the Gospel narrative. He puts Luke in its redemptive-historical context and shows how Luke from the very beginning of the book presents Jesus as the fulfillment of all God's promises to Israel: "all these great New Testament matters are to be found 'written' in the Old Testament, not in proof texts in its obscure corners, but as the very warp and woof of it." THE MESSAGE OF LUKE is an enriching and exciting discussion primarily because Wilcock is so steeped in this context, recognizing that "the two Testaments are one, and the theology which is the sap of the church can rise only from roots which run thus deep and wide through the whole of Scripture." Even though there were sections where I wanted more explanation of difficulties in the text (why does Jesus tell the disciples to buy swords??), dealing with all of these issues is not the point of the book. Wilcock instead gives a sweeping picture of what Luke was trying to achieve in his unique account of Jesus' life and ministry; my main regret is that he didn't include Acts, the sequel!