On one hand, the book was a must-read, and a fascinating bit of inspiration, since I've been trying to do the same thing at our local school in LA for almost three years now. But I agree with others here who take issue with the book's claim to be a "blueprint" for how to do this at other schools. The folks at Nettlehorst had some HUGE advantages going into their reform effort that people at other urban neighborhood schools probably don't have. To name just three: a fabulous, energetic, supportive and welcoming principal...a neighborhood chock full of businesses willing to partner with the school...and a "longstanding" "Friends of..." fundraising group. We have none of these at our school and I question whether the Nettlehorst folks would have been anywhere near as successful, or in anywhere near the short amount of time, if they lacked any of these key elements. Also, as others have noted, it really is a story of gentrification. The authors seem almost mystified when they choose not to focus on test scores, but scores go up anyway as their other improvement efforts take hold. But what was clearly happening as they gradually convinced more middle class neighborhood families to enroll their kids was gentrification of the school's population. And as student family incomes rise, so do test scores - this has been proven in many research studies. It's not such a big mystery. And, yes, even the low income kids' scores will rise because a rising tide tends to float all boats. So although I sincerely applaud the Nettlehorst turnaround and the effort that went into it (I do know, firsthand, how hard it is), I can't quite idolize the reformers as much as the book seems to want me to. I'm actually torn between wanting to buy about 20 copies for our school's staff, neighbors and parents...and being embarrassed to do so because of its wealthy-white-folks-as-saviors tone.