This book offers distinct lessons in writing good, bad, and ugly. It is very unique in that it looks like there are two very distinct authors writing parallel stories, but not talking to one-another. At points the narratives become mutually exclusive. Both vantage points are good in their own ways. DiMatteo is writing from the perspective of someone who directly witnessed the New York mob in its heyday even though he was barely a teenager. His knowledge is sketchy, vulgar, and raw. Benson is more of a seasoned researcher going through court documents, genealogical records, and microfilm.
The book covers the life of Carmine Galante, a notorious New York Mafia leader who was just a step down from the truly famous gangsters like Capone and Luciano. He also had a reputation for tossing out the status quo and causing instability in the underworld. Both narratives emphasize his violence and unpredictability while grudgingly acknowledging that he had both charisma and organizational ability. He was John Gotti before there was John Gotti.
DiMatteo's style is to throw out facts as he remembers them or invents them. In the opening pages, he almost sunk the entire book when he gives a history lesson for the New York Mafia and says police found 60 murder victims hanging on meat hooks in Ignazio Lupo's horse stable ca 1910. The police did not discover anyone on a meat hook. In fact, I am pretty sure no bodies were found in the so-called "murder stable." However, at least three people connected with the establishment were murdered. Obviously, DiMatteo did not have direct knowledge of the Murder Stable, nor does it have any bearing on the Galante story. He may have heard that from his older relatives in the mob; but it is patently untrue and hurt the credibility of the book right at the beginning. In another instance, they mention Tommy Lucchese was in prison for narcotics trafficking - another easily refuted fact.
Benson takes over for a few chapters with a spotty record of Galante going in and out of court. Benson (maybe DiMatteo) did some fine detective work and opens up the early life of Galante to which few people know anything about. His role in the Bonanno Family is conspicuously absent from Joe Bonanno's autobiography. Benson found a lot by digging up various records. He traced Galante's employment (probably coinciding with underworld activities) and his lifelong friendship with Lucchese Family leader Joe Beck DiPalermo. It was touching that when DiPalermo was on his deathbed in a hospital in Texas, Galante flagrantly broke his parole to travel there to say goodbye. The authors poke fun of him for the trip, but it speaks a lot about his priorities and what kind of friend he could have been. He was not all murder and mayhem.
Galante spent 1960-1974 in prison for narcotics. When he got out in 1974, DiMatteo picks up the story and talks about his brief (2) encounters with Galante. Remember, he was a teenager at the time. He did not speak to Galante or vice-versa, he only saw the man, and remembered what was said about him. Galante was causing instability within the underworld as he sought to be boss of the Bonannos - and he needed allies. DiMatteo does not know what he offered his relatives, so they must not have been receptive. The violent disruptive behavior of gangsters like Galante and Gotti gathered like-minded people to him; but by 1974 the Gallos were led by timid Kid Blast Gallo, rather than the unpredictable Crazy Joe. So the Gallos did not support Galante.
Throughout the book, DiMatteo and Benson attribute one murder or suspicious death to Galante after another. They claim these deaths all represent his cruelty, malice, and will to dominate...one hoodlum to rule everything. There is very little evidence connecting the deaths to Galante. At one point, they attribute the deaths of Lucchese drug dealers to Galante, and a Gambino underboss killed some of Galante's dealers in retaliation. Huh? The chapter on the Carlo Tresca Murder has DiMatteo telling readers that Vito Genovese ordered Galante to murder Tresca, even though Genovese was a leader in another family. Benson spends way more time outlining how the order to murder Tresca probably came from Galante's boss, Frank Garofalo. It is a rare example when the two authors do not agree.
The Galante story ends spectacularly in July 1979. The book lists the gunmen and the conspirators. It is very interesting that most of the conspirators were staunchly anti-Galante and pro-Rastelli. Galante and Rusty Rastelli being the contenders for the position of boss of the Bonannos. It appears that Rastelli, who obviously won the contest, subsequently turned on seemingly all of the gunmen and conspirators in the Galante Murder. The authors try to give background on all of them, so it is surprising that they were nearly all low-key hoodlums, and strange that Rastelli viewed them as a threat. These later chapters are possibly the most interesting in the book.
Overall, there is a lot of good information here. Galante is not the subject of any other books, so his story fits very well into the literature. His story has not been told previously. It hurts the book when there are demonstrably false elements that casual readers can pick up. But it is easy to read. Benson's dry journalism is balanced with DiMatteo's colorful anecdotes. It is the first mob book that I have read in a long time that taught me something new.