*Spoilers below*
The novel “Anna In-Between” explores the complexities of cultural inheritance and belonging by positioning Anna as straddling the line between various identities. Author Elizabeth Nunez uses difficult and relatable issues such as illness, infidelity, judgment, and the longing for affection and validation to connect readers to her characters and encourage introspection. By taking a broad view of topics related to difference and imploring character development, retrospection, and dialogue, Nunez zooms in on the shared roots of inherited ideas and systems and undermines dichotomous black-and-white notions with various shades of gray.
In the story, Anna, a Caribbean-American forty-year-old divorced female immigrant, returns to her parent’s home in the Caribbean while on vacation to find that her mother has been sick for years and has not sought treatment, relying on prayer alone. Anna, equipped with an American lens, struggles to understand the culture and how it influences her parent’s beliefs and actions. Simultaneously, Anna grapples with her own identity. Is she Caribbean? American? Both? Or neither? As her family navigates the processes of diagnosis and comes to terms with the realities and struggles of treatment, Anna learns things about her family she did not know, which undermines her judgments about them. She is forced to confront her own beliefs and begins to honestly reflect on her values and her desire for love, acceptance, and approval.
I enjoyed that Nunez’s use of vernacular gives each character personality and voice. I also appreciate how, by giving voice to Anna’s thoughts, the author enabled readers to understand Anna in ways other characters could not. Doing so highlights the reality that what we allow people to see and know of us differs from who we are as a whole and is often the impenetrable wall of our own making, which impedes personal connection and understanding.
As I read, I wondered if Nunez intended that specific scenarios have metaphorical purposes beyond their obvious reasons for inclusion. Could it be that the cancer growing in Anna’s mother’s breast, undisclosed for years, was a metaphor for how failing to discuss things openly and compassionately allows social issues to metastasize? Additionally, I found myself asking why Nunez chose to write certain characters in ways I found stereotypical. For example, Lydia, the servant, speaks in broken English, receives charity so her son can go to school, relies on what he sends home to her, and is a survivor of domestic violence. While I understand the benefit of being able to present the Sinclairs as generous saviors and defenders when trying to illustrate the complexities of their relationship with their subordinates, I wonder if including this trope was necessary or if perpetuating the stereotypical idea that poor, uneducated women are the typical victims of abuse may be irresponsible.
I have mixed feelings about the book. “Anna In-Between” is well-written and induces a lot of contemplation. The characters and their relationships have depth and are believable, but I did not find many of them likable or totally detestable. Because I did not develop strong feelings toward the characters, one way or another, I found the book less entertaining. As such, I report that it is not a book I would read for entertainment. However, The novel has immense value as a tool for producing involved discussions about diversity.