A review of Capitalism (as seen by Orientalist, Western, clash of ideas-centric thinking pretending to be neutral): A Graphic Guide
Writing a Guide to Capitalism should start with the question: how do you describe to other fish the water we all swim in?
This book doesn’t really do that. The lack of preface or introduction means you just have to guess about the authors’ backgrounds and intentions (a red flag imo) so my guess is that they put capitalism firmly in the realm of “ideas”. Ideas are had and contributed to by people over time, and so that’s what the whole book is.
But the pretence that this walkabout through minds & history is neutral is the problem. A simple decision illustrates this: where do you start your journey through history of capitalism from?
Authors chose “capitalism vs feudalism” in Middle Age Europe, where it then spread through the world “like wildfire”. Okay…but on the same page (p5) a cartoon monk says: “ancient trade routes and much of the sea was taken over by the Muslim kingdoms and europe was getting out of the dark ages”.
If trade routes were “taken over” by the Muslims, weren’t they capitalism-ing way better then??
But the rest of the book is Western thought staring into itself, and you’ll have to wait until 3 pages to the end where “Islamic Capitalism” gets two pages to show how despite a “dim view” of interest, banks still figure out how to make money.
Choosing a Quran verse that just says riba’ has “no increase with Allah” instead of THE verse that says Allah and His Messenger literally wage war on them (2:279) is a choice. A terrible, intellectually dishonest, ideological, non-neutral choice.
Treat this book as such, and you’ll be fine. Read more (: