Why did the male nude become an object of spectacle and erotic display in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries? Why was the male nude later eclipsed by the female nude? Why have historians ignored this "crisis" in the representation of masculinity, characterized by a taste for feminized male bodies? In this pioneering and compelling book, Abigail Solomon-Godeau shows that the masculine ideal, whether in the guise of martial, virile heroes or languishing, disempowered youths, raises important questions about the fashioning of masculinity itself. Examining the different forms of ideal manhood in relation to the cataclysms of the French Revolution and to international Neoclassicism, she explores how and why the beautiful male body dominated the visual culture of the time and appealed so powerfully to male spectators.
Drawing on feminist, psychoanalytic, and critical theory, as well as on art and cultural history, Solomon-Godeau proposes a radical revision of Neoclassical visual culture as it relates to the emerging bourgeois order, demonstrating how both reflect the status of women.
Abigail Solomon-Godeau is an American art critic, exhibition curator and art historian. She is Professor Emerita of the Department of History of Art and Architecture at the University of California, Santa Barbara, and the author of several books, including Photography at the Dock: Essays on Photographic History, Institutions, and Practices; Male Trouble: A Crisis in Representation; Rosemary Laing; Chair à canons: Photographie, discours, féminisme; and coauthor of Birgit Jürgenssen.
I absolutely love this book, and I love Abigail Solomon-Godeau as well. That being said, the book is - sadly for me - a little over my head. It has been taking me forever to read. I think it is fascinating, though, and have used many ideas in it to inspire my exploration of art and photography. I don't exactly know if I'll finish reading it, but I do love to pour through the photos now. I did read her other book - photography at the dock and could follow through to her conclusion and get a lot out of it. I guess what is amazing about Solomon-Godeau is that you CAN get a lot out of her ideas even if you don't fully understand them. This review sounds SO unprofessional.
Anyway, her ideas about homosociality are fascinating. The simple understanding - backed with data - that gender roles have been fluid and have gone through oscillating cycles throughout history is one that any child of relativism must know about. It is filled with factoids that you can use to throw at homophobic anti-gay protesters who insist that men and women have always been separate. That's useful, I think. It's just so solid. I haven't read enough art history, and it's been an awesome, yet overwhelming introduction to the field.
Quite an informative and challenging text. Godeau argues that the shift from the prevalence of the male nude in art to the female nude accompanies the shift from aristocratic to bourgeois society in France- it's not just art history, there are some interesting contemporary parallels...