Excellent, but not as good as the Zion Covenant series (4 stars)
The Thoene author duo has produced some of the finest Christian fiction, and this was the entry novel of their first Zion themed series, the Zion Chronicles. Set in 1947 post-war Jerusalem, the main protagonist is photojournalist Ellie Warne, along with archaeologist Moshe Sachar, American pilot David Meyer, newly arrived Jewish Holocaust survivor Rachel Lubetkin, and a number of secondary characters, including nine year old Jacov and his Rabbi grandfather. A violent conflict is brewing between Jews and Arabs after the UN Partition Plan, and Ellie finds herself in the middle of it.
I love the way that the Thoenes weave a compelling and suspenseful narrative as part of a rich historical backdrop, which is well researched and brings to life the struggles and culture of the time. Readers should be aware that the authors seem to support the Zionist ideal of the re-establishment of a Jewish homeland in Israel, including the ingathering of dispersed exiles; at the very least this novel portrays Zionism very favourably. The authors are also Christian, and I appreciate the Christian elements of this novel, which are very present without being preachy - although I was perplexed by one character who refuses to call himself Christian even though he believes Jesus is the Messiah (p307). Overall the story is a good one, as is the history, and the theology.
So why do I think that the Zion Covenant series, which was written after the Zion Chronicles, but describes events and characters before it, is better? This first novel of the Zion Chronicles, Gates of Zion, just seems to reflect a less mature writing team, and over time the Thoenes have evidently sharpened their skills.
To begin with, The Zion Covenant novels feature a much larger, diverse, and more credible cast of characters. Those novels also have a more authentic and serious tone. At times the dialogue in Gates of Zion is cheesy, and the most heart-stopping scenes of suspense read like a cheap action film, with sequences of events rather hard to believe at times, and things just always working out right for the protagonists in the end, even if it requires turning the tables on the bad guys in the most unlikely ways. In comparison,
The Zion Covenant books are more gritty and feel more authentic, and while they have more tragedy, this also makes them more believeable and compelling. The Gates of Zion also wasn't helped by a rather confused set of romances, where the two male protagonists have affections for both main female characters, and vice-versa, which becomes a bit bizarre and unconvincing.
But those weaknesses aside, this is still an excellent, excellent book. It's not as good as the Zion Covenant novels, but it's still terrific, and I also enjoyed the rest of the series.