There was a certain contingent of children in my elementary school who, when the librarians were explaining the Dewey Decimal System, raised their hands upon hearing the word “Biography.” The librarians had asked us about our preferred genres, and I couldn’t possibly fathom what these individuals (mostly girls, in my small New York suburb) found fascinating about people – real people – who died long ago. Superior, clearly, were works that explained the stars and planets with colorful illustrations. If not those, then science fiction, fantasy, comic books, and cartoons; even in whelp form I intuited the inherent dullness of this world. “The universe is expanding,” says Alvy Singer (I was that kid).
As you might predict from the previous paragraph: “He’s now going to recant his words and describe how he got to where he is today, reading what would you know, a biography.” I will have you know that I simply won’t be giving you the satisfaction. But you may ponder the irony of the slice of life I just cut, which is, so to speak, biographical.
It is a fact that this biography is the first I’ll have read in God knows; you won’t find a single bio in my reviews-to-date here, at least, and my memory indeed cannot recall the last instance in which it had absorbed a portrait of the once-living. Maybe it was never. [On rereading this review I discovered that I’ve read Alan Watts’ autobiography, which is not a biography per se, so you can shove right on off now, tut tut.]
Of further note is the fact that I acquired this book nearly two years ago now, along with a bunch of others I had perhaps the intentions of reading but neither time nor willpower: an aspirational purchase, but alas, tsundoku fuel. Endlessly lured by ideas I found more interesting in the moment, I left Jeal’s tale to collect dust on the shelf. Since then my thinking has shifted a few planes; Stanley wasn’t relevant to me anymore.
But it is precisely its irrelevance which now brings me to open it. One heuristic of mine that hasn’t changed is the seeking-out of that which is not relevant, born out of my paranoid aversion to the confirmation bias I see parasitizing so many of my friends, and the desires of my past and present selves differ significantly enough that the two might well be different characters altogether. As such, his recommendation is my now-reading, and I’m all too excited to begin.
The first thing you will notice about this book, upon its arrival in the mail, is its cool 570-page heft. Given its 6-inch width and 9-inch length, quite above average when contrasted with your conventional paperback, this work imposes upon the reader by sheer means of physical fact that he has his work cut out for him. The font, which appears to be 11-point Times New Roman, subsequently occupies 39 lines on each page, so you will be disappointed in expecting anything other than – if not a slog, if not a grind, if not a challenge – a significant devotion of your time.
I would love to see the average age of the person who buys this book – I’m sure Amazon has the data – because it isn’t something I expect my contemporaries to be indulging in, and the more iconoclastic I can be, the better. Let’s say I read at the reasonable pace of three minutes per page; 475 consist the Introduction’s beginning to the Afterword’s end. This totals to 1,475 minutes, or 23.75 hours – nearly a full rotation. If the average movie is two hours long, I could’ve watched twelve.
Nevertheless I did read through the whole thing, which meant I consciously chose to spend my time with Mr. Stanley in lieu of the virtually infinite other options at my disposal, including, in addition to the aforementioned movies, YouTube, Netflix, Hulu, HBO, Vimeo, Amazon Video, or carving miniature wooden Buddha statues to atone for my past vampiric tendencies. Make of that what you will.
More impressive than this feat of poring through, word by word, is the feat of writing the work in the first place. Tim Jeal has committed a titanic amount of time and effort into visiting museums, obtaining access then digging through archives, interviewing academics, curators, and living relations to the various figures, corroborating, arranging facts, selecting which to include and exclude, categorizing and outlining themes, tying everything together into a compelling narrative, and finally going through edit after draft after revision to polish it into the 3.5 pounds you hold in your hands and the 13 pounds that left them in exchange… I counted a total of 204 books cited in Jeal’s bibliography, some of them in several volumes, like the five in Franz Stuhlmann’s Die tagebücher von Dr Emin Pascha.
More impressive still is the “impossible” life of Africa’s greatest explorer, Henry Morton Stanley, née John Rowlands. As much as I’d like to believe I pluck books out of thin air, effortlessly dodging recommendation algorithms like George Clooney dodging invisible laser beams in Ocean’s Eleven’s casino escape scene, this is unfortunately, sadly, regrettably not the case. At some point in my life I must’ve learned something about Stanley the character, enough to provoke my curiosity. If not his debatable heroism then perhaps the sheer feats of Victorian bravado – the likes of which I find more foreign than even the accomplishments of Elon Musk. Who was Stanley? And why?
Heart of Darkness no doubt played a part too. Stylewise, it was far from my favorite in the pantheon of high school literature, but I find myself drawn again and again to the themes of African exploration and exploitation. I’ve seen Apocalypse Now. I meticulously research the cacao varietals and flavor notes of my single-origin dark chocolate bars. And now I’ve read Jeal’s biography. There must be something peculiar, something mystical, about the African land which draws me to it, although I’ve never stepped foot on the continent; something about the confluence of environmental factors – the searing heat, the torrid downpours, the swamp miasmas, the barren sands – which force certain adaptations upon both those native to it and those who seek to conquer it. As humanity, Eden may be questioned as the garden of our mythological origin, but Africa is unquestionably the terrace of our biological origin.
What motivated Jeal to write this? It appears to be something as simple as access to a collection of letters unavailable to all previous biographers. With vivid brio he dissects the inaccuracies of past biographies, so that we may appreciate the increased erudition he brings to bear while resigning his predecessors to the lands of the wrong. From this we must deduce that history is necessarily revisionist; there is no “final accounting.”
If a single motif pervades the work, it is: “The road to hell is paved with good intentions,” and Jeal focuses on the “good intentions” part of the proverb, using new evidence to paint a new portrait of a man largely damned by history, deducing a coherent and, where possible, fatal logic in the decisions and turning points of the explorer’s life; Schopenhauer said something along the lines of, “Man can do what he wills but he cannot will what he wills.”
More importantly, what was Jeal actually trying to achieve? Stanley’s last thought occurred on his deathbed over a century ago. I’m sure his ghost in hell or heaven would be pleased at his fellow Englishman’s gargantuan effort to exonerate him – if it existed (which it doesn’t). Furthermore, the fallout of African colonization has long since settled, and a renewed understanding of one of its pioneers will do nothing to change the chaotic situation on the ground today. At best this is the result of an old man’s idle curiosity – Jeal was 63 when his book was published in 2007 and Stanley was 63 when he died in 1904 (synchronicity much, Mr. Jung?) – best for its readers’ idle entertainment. At 24, I am far too young to be idle, so at best for me this amounted to three full 8-hour days’ worth of procrastination.
Procrastinating is fun though, I won’t deny that, and Jeal does tell a good story. I’m not a masochist, which means if I don’t like the food on my plate, I won’t finish eating it, and if I don’t like what I’m reading, I don’t finish reading it; sunk cost fallacy destroys lives, look it up. The reason Jeal loses a star is due to his habit, albeit a rare one, of interpreting motives where the evidence only allows for speculation. The reader should be allowed to develop his own subtexts in these cases, rather than have them inserted into his mind by the author.
Favorite Quotes
“People who are shut up in institutions often have fantasies of escape and freedom, of climbing over walls, living in woods, and walking for days towards far horizons.” [p.23]
“In January 1870 Stanley had discussed the purpose of human life with the rich and sybaritic American consul in Cairo, Mr. G.C. Taylor. Taylor had argued that, since man was fated to be ‘dust like the beasts’, a life of idealism and self-sacrifice made less sense than a life of pleasure-seeking. Stanley had disagreed. Even if life could be proved purposeless, he told Taylor, it would still matter to him personally: ‘for my own spirit’s satisfaction … It is in my nature to toil, as it is in the other’s nature to enjoy.’” [p.121]
“The sensitivity of the early twenty-first-century observer to racial questions makes judging the actions of nineteenth-century explorers with objectivity and fairness extremely difficult. Men coming from a society in which public hangings had only recently been abolished – and where floggings in the armed services, and beatings in workhouses and schools, were ferocious – were bound to have few inhibitions about using a whip on their porters.” [p.223]
“This incident confirmed his growing conviction that fame was useless to him. It not only made his relatives more grasping, but brought threatening letters, and numerous invitations from strangers. Most days Henry would get thirty or more letters from people he had never heard of. Since he hated being stared at in the street, he felt obliged to take expensive hackney cabs everywhere.” [p.146]
“Indispensable to all politicians is the ability to brush off insults and not take them personally, so that yesterday’s enemy can become tomorrow’s friend, and no falling out need be final. For a man of Stanley’s sensitivities, tactical friendships, and all forms of dissembling, were impossible. Being used to exercise command rather than negotiate alliances, he lacked the easy manner and clubbable smiles with which politicians mask naked ambition.” [p.425]
Another reviewer: "Stanley is like the Forrest Gump of the mid-1800s."