Joshua was more than a bad little kid; he was evil. But nobody knew about the big oak tree in the woods or the hideous creatures that bid Joshua to kill, or about the changes in Joshua that brought him closer to being one of them.
The idea of an 8-year-old shithead slowly becoming possessed by an evil oak tree and transforming into a murder-crazy little demon operating out of a sinister treehouse in a bizarre puberty metaphor objectively sounds amazing.
But as much as the reader begs...as much as the reader pleads...Victor Mullen is absolutely steadfast in his refusal to take the concept and run with it.
Joshua, the little demon shithead, is maybe present for 50-75 pages of the 304-page novel. Maybe. The bulk of the story is the adults being complete assholes to each other and arguing over the most inane topics. An example:
"Steve averted his eyes to avoid Swanson's accusing stare. 'I'm doing the best I can! I'm busting my ass trying to run a home and work at the same time! It's not easy!' 'Of course it's not easy!' Swanson said. 'Life isn't easy! Nobody's life is easy! What are there, eight, nine billion people in the world? I'll bet there aren't half a dozen who could honestly say life is easy. People with nothing have problems...people with everything have problems...and people in between have problems. Life is a goddamned problem, Steve, but most people manage to scrape through.'"
Keep in mind this random motivational speech is occurring in the final pages of the book, when Joshua is supposed to be terrorizing the community and, as the build-up might lead you to believe, slaughtering victims en masse (spoiler: this doesn't happen).
It's not all bad, though. I enjoyed the quirky characters, like Father O'Rourke, the very VERY Irish priest who makes an appearance near the beginning (throwing out "wee lamb"s and "me young feller"s like they're going out of style), and Running Horse, the Shawnee medicine man who shows up because...what the hell, let's just throw a medicine man in here, why the fuck not.
But it's late-eighties Zebra horror literature, so there's a charm to it that pushed me to the finish line. The characters are dumb as hell (even by paperback horror standards), the men are all smarmy assholes and their poor wives are constantly put down by them, and the puberty metaphor is delightfully cringey, with descriptions of Joshua's arousal at his "transformation" (constantly caressing himself and moaning) and the hair sprouting across his chest. It's deeply uncomfortable, but heavy-handed in a very fun way.
Apparently this is the sequel to Mullen's previous novel, The Toy Tree, and the ending to Tree House leaves room for a potential third book in the series. Despite everything, I must give Mullen credit for his tireless efforts to make evil trees the next big thing. I salute you, man.
I went into this book not expecting much. I've decided that my summer reading list would consist mostly of the old 80's, early 90's horror novels I spent reading during the summers when I was a kid. The book itself was well-written and was a nice change of pace from the poorly edited, self-published e-book rut I seemed to find myself. The book starts a bit slow, but begins to pick up speed about a third of the way through. Not the best horror book I've ever read, but entertaining enough that I felt it deserved four stars.
" Steve Berenger and his girlfriend, Stacy, had shared the ultimate act of love beneath that oak tree. Unknown to them at the time, of course, Stacy conceived Steve's child under that very tree. How could they know that their tender lovemaking was witnessed by the evil powers within the tree? How could they know that those powers of evil had become enraged by the tenderness of their love and had punished them by planting within Stacy's womb the seeds of their fury?"
Apart from one genuinely creepy sequence (a weird, hallucinatory scene inside of the tree), this is pretty much just your typical evil child novel, without much to distinguish itself from any number of other books from around the same time. The plot is probably familiar to anyone who reads old horror novels: the kid goes from throwing tantrums to playing cruel practical jokes to killing animals to killing people, all while the father refuses to acknowledge that his child is responsible. It's also a sequel, so the author recaps the previous book throughout it, although these parts often feel shoehorned in and interrupt the flow of the plot. As far as 80s horror novels go, it's not the worst I've read, but it doesn't really have anything particular to recommend about it.