In an unspecified future time, a boy emerges from an underground bunker, where he had thus far spent his entire life. He finds a world in which humans have become feral creatures, while tigers, lions, leopards, gorillas and other “animals” have become anthropomorphized members of advanced civilizations.
Yes, the PLANET OF THE APES parallels are striking…and deliberate. The APES movies were quite popular in 1972, when KAMANDI debuted, and Wikipedia tells me that publisher DC Comics wanted a piece of that pie. According to Wikipedia, DC couldn’t obtain a license to publish PLANET OF THE APES comics, so they charged writer/artist Jack Kirby with creating something similar.
Of course, this was the Jack Kirby who co-created (with Stan Lee) much of the Marvel universe. He isn’t going to just copy PLANET OF THE APES. While the inspiration is evident, then, the end product is pure Kirby. Thus, we have a great variety of anthropomorphic animals, with apes being only one species. The animals have built cities, and they fight wars, drive cool-looking futuristic vehicles, and even hunt humans or put them in “nature reserves.” There are tiger soldiers, dog scientists, lion park rangers and gorilla cowboys. Kamandi encounters them all - and many more - as he explores this strange new world.
As is typical with Kirby, ideas come fast and furiously, and the story moves at a frenetic pace. There is thus little time for details, and in this first volume (reprinting the first ten issues from 1972-1973) we never learn what caused this massive world change. We’re merely told that there was a “natural disaster” and that radiation somehow resulted from this. When did this disaster occur? Did the grandfather who raised Kamandi (We never actually see him, and he dies offscreen.) remember the world before the disaster…or did several generations of Kamandi’s family live in that bunker? If so, then how did they survive that long? Why do most animals seem anthropomorphized, except, apparently, for the horses that some ride and the giant, savage bats who attack Kamandi near the end of the volume?
As I read, I came to appreciate Kirby’s wisdom in leaving such matters vague. This decision left my imagination to roam and likely allowed Kirby to get on with the story and let it take him wherever it will. If you’re looking for sophisticated fantasy world-building, then…well, you won’t find it here, but you will find plenty of imagination and a lot of fun.
If you’ve read to this point, then you may already know if KAMANDI will be for you. It’s true that it won’t be for everyone. Comics fans love Kirby for his contributions to the medium but are decidedly divided on his post-1970 work without collaborator Stan Lee. To detractors, Kirby had great ideas but also some silly ideas and shallow characters. Lee, they argue, added greater characterization, better dialogue and irreverent humor. Kirby’s work does sometimes seem quaint and old-fashioned now, and KAMANDI does often read as an old-fashioned “boy’s adventure story,” with the scarcity of female characters being especially noticeable today.
There are also ways, though, in which Kirby seems ahead of his time. I noted his frenetic pacing, for example, and in this sense, KAMANDI often feels like a modern action movie. Something is always happening or about to happen, and while you might deem KAMANDI goofy, it’s unlikely to bore you. Kirby’s art, as always, is very dynamic, and Kirby especially excels at action scenes, of which there are many. In fairness, I’ll note that some also find Kirby’s art ugly, but to many others - including myself - it remains kinetic, dynamic and exciting.
Some argue that Kirby doesn’t write characters well. It’s perhaps worth nothing, then, that Kirby's characters have endured much longer than those of virtually any other creator. Even if we only consider his post-1970 work, we still have the Fourth World characters (with DC especially making frequent use of “cosmic” villain Darkseid - who in turn inspired Marvel’s Thanos), the Demon, Cobra, OMAC, the Eternals (who recently starred in their own film.), Machine Man, Devil Dinosaur and the villain Arnim Zola, to name a few. Writers clearly find something appealing about these characters, as they revive them again and again, and I’m not convinced that later efforts to give them more depth have improved them. Say what you will about Kirby’s characters, but they’re always well defined and memorable. Kamandi himself is young and a bit naive and impulsive, but also brave and heroic. He well serves the story that Kirby wants to tell.
This last point may explain modern fans’ gripes about Kirby. Like many writers of his generation, Kirby puts the story first and his characters exist in service of it. Today’s fan audiences, however, often prefer the reverse. The current existence of highly profitable character-driven media franchises have only solidified both the supply of and demand for such material.
Kirby is most definitely “for me,” and I find KAMANDI a bold, exhilarating romp. Will it be for you? If you’ve encountered Kirby’s work before, then you’ll already know the answer, as KAMANDI is not a big departure from his canon. If you haven’t encountered Kirby before, then I encourage you to do so, and KAMANDI is as good a place to start as any. Given that the series is completely stand alone, in fact, with no shared universe continuity baggage, it might even be a better place than most.
If you’re STILL wondering whether to try KAMANDI, then I’ll note again that there are “tiger soldiers, dog scientists, lion park rangers and gorilla cowboys,” along with giant, savage bats, futuristic vehicles, a deadly sentient virus, a small misshapen villain with a large head, tigers warring with gorillas, and…I could go on and on. If you’re like me, then you were probably hooked with the phrase “gorilla cowboys.” Seriously - how could that NOT be a winner?