The First Jesuits by John O'Malley, S.J., is a five star book for anyone who has already done some reading in the history of the Reformation and is a familiar with the major theological writers of the middle ages and Renaissance (e.g. Thomas Aquinas, Erasmus, Jean Calvin, Thomas à Kempis and Luther). For the reader with the right background, Father O'Malley's book is lively and engaging. For those who are not familiar with the subject area, it will probably be quite a painful slog.
O'Malley does a magnificent job of demolishing the myths about the Jesuits and explaining what they were. The myths of course are many. Popular writers like Alexander Dumas have portrayed them as arch-conspirators directing the policies of the Royal dynasties of Europe. Others like Eugene Sue have shown the Jesuits duping middle class families in order to ensure that their wealth will be bequeathed to the Jesuit order. Still others, have described the papal chartered Jesuits as interfering in the jurisdictions of the local bishops wherever they operated. At the same time some of the legends show the Jesuits in a positive light. They are commonly described by academic historians as having been formed in response to Luther and having lead the Counter Reformation against Protestantism. O'Malley demonstrates that the Jesuits were none of these things.
O'Malley shows the Jesuits as having been formed by providential chance. A group of Spanish priests studying a the University of Paris formed the order out the simple desire to "care for souls". Instead of devoting themselves to lives of ritualistic prayer as did members of monastic orders, the Jesuits wanted to minister to people in the lay world. During the period covered by O'Malley (i.e. 1540-1565), the Jesuits did not involve themselves in palace intrigues and in fact demonstrated no interest in dynastic politics. They operated schools, orphanages, hospitals and shelters for prostitutes in Italy, Spain, Portugal, France and Germany. In all these nations they collaborated well with the local bishops who welcomed them and were particularly glad to see them found educational institutions.
O'Malley is at his very best in explaining how the Jesuits practiced their religion. They were inspired by Thomas à Kempis' "Imitation of Christ". They wanted to follow Christ like the original apostles. Hence they became the "companions of Jesus." They did not perform the liturgy of the hours. Instead they concentrated on emotional engagement in their relationship with Jesus. Loyola created his system of "Spiritual Exercises" to allow the members to develop a strong personal connection with Christ. The Jesuits were the first to conduct "retreats" for the purpose of allowing individual Catholics to reflect on and develop their faith.
The Jesuits were true men of the Renaissance. They were profound humanists who wanted a more human religion. Because they accepted Catholic Dogmas and the authority of the Pope, they have been perceived as having been created in response to Protestantism. The Jesuits however were not reacting against anything. They were simply endeavouring to be engaged companions of Christ within Christ's church.
As a group, the Jesuits were very energetic and tried many things. In O'Malley's view, they fell into becoming a teach order. The order was founded by intellectuals and was very good at recruiting individuals with intellectual temperaments. Thus they were good teachers. However, equally importantly they arrived on the scene at a time when the middle classes and the aristocracy decided that schools were important. Thus, the Jesuit schools had no trouble either attracting students or obtaining financial support.
O'Malley does a particularly good job of explaining the teaching techniques of the order's schools. The Jesuits employed the Paris method (a.k.a. modus parisiensis) was an organized plan for the progress of the student through increasingly complex materials. The Jesuit Schools thus were the first in Europe to emply a curriculum that students would follow throughout their entire course of study. In this as in so many other areas, the Jesuits stand as great innovators who have had a lasting impact on our society.
While O'Malley does an excellent job of describing the Jesuit endeavours in the area of education his examination of the missionary activity is highly disappointing. After receiving a Papal Charter in 1540, the Jesuits would lead the drive to bring Christianity to Canada, South America, India, Japan, China and other countries until their order would be dissolved in 1767. While acknowledging that the Jesuits were very active in spreading Christianity in Asia and the New World, O'Malley devotes very little space in his book to this aspect of the Jesuit order. It is hard to tell whether O'Malley's cursory treatment of the Jesuit Missions is due to his feeling that other authors had adequately covered the material or whether he felt that the magnitude of endeavour during the time frame of his book did not justify any longer treatment. However, good his reasons may have been, I was disappointed.
Finally it must be recognized that the content of the book was largely dictated by the primary sources that O'Malley chose to consult. Effectively "The First Jesuits" is based on the writings of Ignatius of Loyola, and two of his close collaborators Jéronimo Nadal (the first Vicar General of the order) and Juan Alfonso de Polanco (Loyola's secretary from 1547 to 1556). Using these sources, O'Malley has written a wonderful book about the founding of the Jesuits and their place in the gestalt of the Renaissance.