I knew nothing of Howells when I began A Foregone Conclusion, other than that his best-known novel is The Rise of Silas Lapham. I’ve subsequently read some background, enough to know that Howells’ influence was greatest as a critic, as an advocate for particular authors that he admired (Zola, Tolstoy, Dunbar, Crane, Norris, et al.) and for their use of a realistic style. After reading A Foregone Conclusion and noting Howells’ endorsement of realism, I began to wonder what specific novels and novelists exemplified the false or distorted/idealized representation of things that he was reacting to…?
In a Wikipedia citation about Howells’ novel, The Rise of Silas Lapham (which I’m currently reading), its author writes: “Howells is known to be the father of American realism, and a denouncer of the sentimental novel. The resolution of the love triangle of Irene Lapham, Tom Corey, and Penelope Lapham highlights Howells' rejection of the conventions of sentimental romantic novels as unrealistic and deceitful. An excerpt of the text was used in the 2019 AP English Literature and Composition Exam as a short answer question.”
In another Wikipedia article, Howells speaks of his advocacy of realism: “I hope the time is coming when not only the artist, but the common, average man, who always ‘has the standard of the arts in his power,' will have also the courage to apply it, and will reject the ideal grasshopper wherever he finds it, in science, in literature, in art, because it is not ‘simple, natural, and honest,' because it is not like a real grasshopper. But I will own that I think the time is yet far off, and that the people who have been brought up on the ideal grasshopper, the heroic grasshopper, the impassioned grasshopper, the self-devoted, adventureful, good old romantic card-board grasshopper, must die out before the simple, honest, and natural grasshopper can have a fair field.”
As a representative statement of Howells’ critical/aesthetic thinking, I find the grasshopper citation a bit of a head-scratcher. There aren’t many who think of ideal or sentimental or heroic grasshoppers—unless it’s a case of Disney-fication and anthropomorphism—and I again wonder, just which specific fiction/novel is Howells reacting to…?
With all the foregoing in mind, knowing that Howells’ was reacting to sentimental and falsely melodramatic depictions of relations, I wondered at the completion of A Foregone Conclusion how it still seemed to me, if not a romantic representation of facts, a somewhat stilted depiction of events that by the very nature of social conventions made it seem “old fashioned” and romantic, in a wistful, almost nostalgic fashion. And yet it occurs to me that the hint of a rueful wistfulness is akin to the endings found in Dostoyevsky’s The Idiot and Hemingway’s The Sun Also Rises. In each of these novels, there is a hard-headed dismissal of events that have shaped the present moment, but there is also intimation of the heart’s inability to accede completely to the facts.
I enjoyed A Foregone Conclusion, though I had to consciously filter my perceptions. Howells’ thoroughgoing, faithful depiction of the social constraints placed on the characters due to habit and convention made them all seem old fashioned, which from our differently-conventional, contemporary point of view is almost itself a romantic/fictional mode of being. So, while Howells is exercising documentary fidelity, contemporary readers are perceiving authorial flourishes that appear to romanticize because of the evocation of “costume drama” conventions.
The novel’s denouement—a semi-elegiac consideration of the events and the lives and time lost that led to the “foregone conclusion” of the marriage of Henry Ferris and Florida Verlain—is an attempt to both consider the romantic/melodramatic aspects of their affaire de coeur and to dismiss them. This appeal to a rational summation does not fly, and if nothing else, Howells makes clear that even a “realistic” treatment of affairs of the heart can’t shake entirely the tropes that evoke romantic idealization.