I made it halfway through the book, became bored and stopped. The problem? A couple of things:
The main issue is a problem I see a lot in romances these days: the characters come together far too soon and all tension is lost.
Problem #2: The tension here wasn't great from the start. It read as though he hadn't been attracted to her and, very suddenly, he was because the author TOLD me he was, but she did not show it.
Problem #3: Then they are having sex, even though Helena is a virgin. Do I think that's possible back then? Sure. As written? Not really. She gave it up far too easily. There was no real struggle about her feelings for him or his for her. The obstacle for her to get over was that he was the son of a highwayman and both his parents had hung for their crimes.
Now that was a great concept. Lots of struggle and tension there with class and emotions, but she didn't use it. There was little internal struggle in Daniel over his parents' past, and what there was, again, was told to the reader, not shown. So much chance here for internal torment on the part of Daniel and Helena's response to it - lost opportunity.
Problem #4: Helena getting upset with him for not telling her he'd worked for Crouch - this came off confusing. Even though he'd been Crouch's second hand, he'd still been a kid when he did it. That didn't seem to matter to Helena. I didn't understand why that changed things to her and why she got upset over it. Also, this made her seem very small that, as she knew him so well by that point, she still turned on him when she found out about it. This was when I'd finally had enough, to be honest.
Problem #5: Given the timeframe, I can't buy off on Helena going off with Daniel - alone - for the reasons given. It was far too convenient. She wants to go, so she goes? And no escort? Yeah, I know: they posted as a married couple. Sorry, that doesn't wash. That would have been the height of irresponsibility in those days. And, ex-highwayman or not, Daniel would not have gone for it if he'd cared about her at all. IT would have been too easy to be found out. Obviously someone is caring for her father while she's gone, so someone knows she's left. And they would have been seen on the way. I could not accept this as an option. That's not to say things could not have been worked so that they would be alone through no course of their own itention - that would have been believeable, but this was not.
So what was positive?
This author did something that many romance authors do not do. Daniel was a well developed character. I loved that he had a criminal past he'd risen above - and that rise, as written, made sense. He was a flawed character with a past he'd rather not remember. That was woven in well several times. Again, I would have liked to see more of his struggle, rather than just be told of it, but her creating of his character was well planned and executed.
I liked Helena far less so, because of the reasons stated above, but she had been crippled from a sickness, so she was also flawed. And he liked her regardless of the flaw. I liked that.
I also liked that the sister had been taken in by this man who had seemed like such a great match. I had conflicting feelings about the story jumping from Helena's story to Juliet's - I didn't really care about Juliet's to be honest and it seemed a bit jarring - but it was interesting and gave a lot of scope for development between the sisters.
For these positives, I wish I could have stayed engaged, but once the tension is lost and a story just becomes about how to keep them apart for the next 150 pages, I move on. I wish the author had kept Daniel and Helena's build up going until the end of the book. I don't need to read the sex (I hope publishers don't pressure authors to add those things in), but I do need the steady build of tension.