As distinctive as it has been, the Bush administration’s foreign policy still fits within Hook and Spanier’s coherent theme of American exceptionalism. Chances are that the Obama administration, no matter how different it may be, will also share this orientation in important ways, thereby giving your students the historical context they need to understand not just the past eight years, but the full history of American foreign policy since World War II. This revision to their classic text is much more than a simple update. Careful editing and streamlining of key chapters keep the book relevant and accessible, while placing recent events in their proper perspective. Key revisions Students will also find abundant resources in new or updated tables, figures, and maps, as well as a robust set of appendixes and end-of-chapter materials, including a chronology of world events and annotated web resources.
Every four years America replaces a stupid president with a more stupid one and anyone can notice this ,After the second world war they replace a fool president , Harry Truman who decided to destroy thousands of Japanese people by the nuclear bomb , by another stupid guy ,Dwight D. Eisenhower who decided also to help France and Israel in their triple war on Egypt in 1956 , and then Lyndon Johnson , John Kennedy and Nixon , the cheater president , continue this bloody war policy in Vietnam for 20 years , And now in the 3rd millennium their descendants , George W. Bush and Barrack H. Obama , continue this policy in Afghanistan , Iraq and Syria and aiming to extend it to the whole world if they can
So, we can abbreviate the American Foreign Policy Since The Second World War
In some ways, I feel like I've been reading this book for 20 years.
My Model UN teacher assigned us the first chapter to read in 9th grade, and it's been sitting on my bookshelf ever since.
This is book is a survey of US foreign policy since WW II. For someone like me, who has never taken a history class on the Cold War, it connected a lot of dots. I still need more information - I haven't connected all the dots on Détente, but this helped. A lot. And it was really cool that I was reading about Kosovo at the same time my mom was in the Balkans.
There are certainly something interesting going on with pacing - when the Berlin Wall falls, it feels like we're only half-way through the book, yet 9/11 only gets a few paragraphs. For a kid born in the 90's, it nice to get more color on events that occurred in my lifetime, but that I was not politically conscious enough to witness.
I've owned this book for a long time. It's going to sit on my shelf for a lot longer. I need to fix its binding. I'm grateful to have it. It's like a compass for the latter half of the 20th century. It only scratches the surface of what happened, but it points me in the right direction.
Çevirisi gerçekten kötü bir kitaptı. Bunun dışında konu ile ilgili bilgisi olan birine yeni bir bakış açısı kazandıracağını düşünmesem de hafıza tazelemek açısından yerinde bir eser olduğunu düşünüyorum.
Very informative about American foreign policy. Takes an interesting realist perspective. One footnote is out of date due to the suspension of Trumps Twitter.
Despite being a very slow read, I loved this book. If you'd like to gain a better understanding of global interactions and the Cold War, this is the book for you. While reading this book, you begin to connect the dots and see the secondary and tertiary effects of conflicts or economic events during the Cold War. Spanier sufficiently covers events like the SALT treaties or the Vietnam War, but he digs deeper and gets down into the weeds of lesser known events. For example, he shows the effects of Soviet-Cuba intervention in Angola, the Sino-Vietnamese conflict of 1979, the Suez War, and civil war in El Salvador.
(Unfortunately, I only have the eleventh edition, which ends during Reagan's presidency. However, if Spanier covers the policies of 1990 and on as well as he covers foreign policy in this book, I'd imagine the more recent editions are just as good.)
Decent book. The book seems to come from a center-right point of view. Nevertheless it discusses key points in American foreign policy has a strong historical element. The book is good in explaining the crisis United States faced in international politics and how policy makers handled those crisis and formulated policies. The book seems to avoid flaws and double standards in U.S. foreign policy, in that sense it fails to connect important events in history which were either a direct or indirect consequence of U.S. policy.
Very good discussions about the events that shaped US foreign policy since the cold war era. If you are not a history buff, this book will probably be very informative and useful to you.
Actually probably one of the best textbooks I've ever used. Not painful at all, though the blow-by-blows of September 11th and the 2008 economic crisis were a little unnecessary.
Read this for my Defense Foreign Policy class and thought it was a great history of American foreign policy. Good if you're just wanting to take in some history too!