When I picked up Hammerjack at the local library, I was expecting true, cyberpunk noir in the style of "Neuromancer." However, what I got was something that I would warn people against reading.
To be fair, Hammerjack has a detailed world that's full of grime and filth. There were even some nice touches with Giller's "street species." However, even a solid plot couldn't save this book from the major problem I had; the way it was told.
I love metaphor, as anyone that's read any of my own work knows. But the metaphors in Hammerjack get tortured so badly that I often wonder what the hell it is he's talking about after a sentence or two. It got to the point where I was skipping description just to keep with the story's flow. This was problem number one. What earned it such a low rating though was how shallow and boring most of the cast was.
Our main character especially suffers from being blase. He's a spook without a purpose, a reformed hammerjack himself, and he's supposedly a name that strikes fear into the regulars. But we never really see him do anything to justify that reputation, nor do we see him use it at any point. It feels as if we're just supposed to accept this view of him, which really isn't played out in his own thought patterns. He feels very soft, and way too soft to be playing this kind of hardball game.
Aside from our lead though, everything felt like it was trying too hard. Avalon, the deadliest woman on two planets, feels like a parody of the super soldier. The cultish villains lack any real punch, and on the whole any real visceral content is lost in the data stream.
My suggestion, to make this a better book and something that would have been more engaging, would have been to focus more on the human aspects, and to view technology through them, rather than the other way around.