Defining Conservatism: The Principles That Will Bring Our Country Back

by JONATHAN KROHN

Defining Conservatism is a passionate appeal to a political movement that is re-examining its identity as Republicans set their sights on 2010 and beyond. A dedicated young conservative, Jonathan Krohn presents conservative philoso¬phy’s basic tenets in this remarkably earnest and impeccably reasoned primer. This book, clear and informative, is a history lesson, a manifesto, and a roadmap for the future. It is Krohn’s rallying call to action not just for conservatives, but for anyone interested in the political state of our nation. In Defining Conservatism , Krohn challenges “government expansionists,” whose faith in Wash¬ington and the basic pillars of government exceeds their faith in the individual. At the same time, he boldly stakes out four unshakeable principles for conservatives to rally ? Respect for the Constitution ? Respect for human life ? Belief in minimalist government ? Insistence upon personal responsibility Anyone interested in the basic differences between conservative and liberal thought will find Krohn’s writing at once compelling, informa¬tive, intelligent, and—for those who do not agree with him—in some respects controversial. Defining Conservatism is a must-read for anyone who is interested in the basic principles upon which the United States was founded, and perhaps most importantly, for anyone who is concerned with the future of this country.

154 pages, Paperback

First published January 19, 2010

Reviews

[Fabien · Rating 2 out of 5]

Even though there are good ideas, there are way too many errors (confusing socialism, marxism, communism for instance) and weak economics.

Another example: The state(s) of nature defined by political philosophers (Hobbes, Rousseau, etc.) is a not a historical period but a theoretical framework construed to analyze relationships as a natural state before the apparition of society.

Some arguments are downright faltering - but how can't they be when the subjects are so touchy? For instance, when talking about the right to life, which is defined as an individual's right to enjoy their life - and the end of it too. This right is denied for death penalty: anyone condemned to death has given up their right to live by not conforming to society's rule. The argument is okay, but on the page right before, euthanasia is denied to terminally ill patient: what if they want to give up their right to live? Any opinion is valid as long as it is logical and holds for all situations.

[Mmiller400m · Rating 3 out of 5]

The information is there. I learned a few things. It is just hard to hear this coming from a kid. He doesn't have the life experiences to discuss some of the things he does. How could a silver spoon brat know anything about what programs are needed and how government needs to run? I'm sad to be a Republican if this is our brightest future. If anything, this book should be called 'Questioning Conservatism'.

[David Nichols · Rating 2 out of 5]

About what one would expect from a lively, intelligent 14-year-old. Perhaps Krohn will grow up to write a decent book someday, but I doubt it; he's not likely to develop the discipline and patience that a good author requires.

[Rachelle · Rating 4 out of 5]

Concise and philosophical, a great introduction to conservative principles. It's organized into short, easy-to-read chapters.

[Jane · Rating 3 out of 5]

14 y/o spoke at RWWC luncheon on Fox news.
4 principles define:
respect for constitution, respect for life, personal responsibility and less gov't

[Lu]

good get out again