Short thoughts on each work translated here. Ultimately, Rosenberg's biggest goal was to represent the diversity of the Biblical authors through his translations while openly taking creative liberties. I like this, but some of the creative decisions just end up rubbing me the wrong way through sheer diversity and variety. E.g., it will always be weird to me for Ecclesiastes to mention 'muzak'.
Torah (Genesis, Exodus, Numbers): Great, the most inspired translation in here. This is the same material for the most part as is covered in The Book of J.
Prophets:
•2 Samuel: the only extended prose translation. Good but not so different from other translations
•Isaiah: Taking selections from different 'Isaiahs' to represent the books diversity and longtime communal writing process is great. Another standout.
•Jeremiah, Zechariah: enjoyable but fragmentary and insubstantial. I am a big fan of Jeremiah so that was a little disappointing
•Jonah: honestly one of the preferred translations I have read but ultimately Jonah doesn't have a lot of wiggle room creatively and is pretty much a masterpiece in any translation.
Writings:
•Psalms: only about 20 are translated but they are all great. There are less 'modern' allusions but more wouldn't even be bad, the format of the Psalms is better for contemporary language than many other, more narrative books
•Lamentations, Song of Songs, Daniel, Ezra/Nehemiah: All relatively fragmentary and short translations of portions of each of these books, okay but not overly impactful
•Job: another highlight, but only Job's speeches are translated, turning a (loosely) narrative and quite philosophical book into more of an extended poetic lament. It is quite interesting but I'm not a huge fan of the translation overall
•Ecclesiastes: Excellent but only portions are translated. This and Job are the most bothersome to me with references to things like Mercedes-Benz, Stalin, Hollywood, etc
•Ruth, Esther, Judith: besides the Torah books here these are my favorite translations, but they seem to me also some of the more creatively conservative as well. Ruth is here in full (yay), while Esther and Judith are fragmentary, but they all seem to brim with the original authors' creative power in the way that I feel the entire book desires to and doesn't always manage.
---
Overall, good to greatish, if you are interested in it you'll probably find something in here to love, but I can only recommend this as a supplement to something like the JPS Hebrew-English Tanakh for plain accuracy, or the KJV for sublime phrasing and historical value. Or to get a taste of Rosenberg's translation peak, try starting with The Book of J.