I have read several histories of different cities, usually the rise n' fall variety. A few take the approach of cheerleaders. This volume is more like a cheerleader than a rise n' fall story. Pacyga takes a unique angle for this book by focusing on how different ethnic groups impacted the city.
Readers looking for the Irish fleeing the Potato Famine, or Germans fleeing the 1848 Revolutions, there is almost nothing about that here. Pacyga offers a brief and jumpy beginning to Chicago. Obviously, early American history is not his forte. He is far more in-depth with later periods of the city, and his almost constant focus on African-Americans for nearly 1/3 or 1/4 of the book suggests a specialty in sociology or political science. Readers may think that Chicago popped out of the prairie and marsh in the 1840s when the canal linking Lake Michigan with the Mississippi was built. According to Pacyga, the town's population was less than 1,000 for most of the 1830s. How this all came about is glossed over with a dismissive "Eastern investors" explanation. Diverse ethnic groups, especially African-Americans, had little if any role in Chicago at this time, so why bother discussing it. However, he does focus on the near-mythical trader Jean-Baptiste who came from the French colony of Saint Dominique (Haiti) as the first Westerner in what would become Chicago, so he did find an angle he could eagerly pursue.
To be fair, he does spend a lot of time on the class warfare of the industrial age of the city, roughly 1880-1950. The chapters are a bit long, but they are broken into subdivisions of manageable, bite-size pieces that average about 10 pages each. It is easy to locate certain periods and events to read more about them. The further reading / works cited is surprisingly weak as Pacyga draws on a limited number of sources. Consider Al Capone, for example. The subsection on "gangland" is about 7 pages. Nearly all of it is derived from Racketeer's Progress by Andrew Cohen. Cohen's work is fascinated and detailed with a focus on labor racketeers rather than Al Capone or his gang wars. Some of Pacyga's statements in this section are not clearly found in Cohen's work (or any other). For example, I have not seen any published work suggest that Big Jim Colosimo was a bagman for the Loop aldermen "Bath House" Coughlin and "Hinky Dink" Kenna. Nor have I seen anyone else publish that Frankie Yale was trying to control Chicago through Torrio and Capone. Lastly, after reading several biographies on Al Capone, I have never seen any mention of his alleged front of Dr. Al Brown; but nearly everyone else takes note of his humble claim to being a second-hand furniture dealer.
Those are not the only problems that I found on gangland, or rather, what was not included. The book nearly completely omits Capone's great rivalry with the North Side Gang led by Dion O'banion. Pacyga recites the assassination of Hymie Weiss in front of a cathedral and quickly moves on. This is part of a greater problem, which Pacyga notes: he is biased on the South Side to the seeming exclusion of everything else. He himself notes that he writes with a focus on the South Side and the Back of Yards / meat-packing district in particular. The book does talk about the Poles and the African-Americans way too much.
The brevity of some parts - like the Haymarket Bombing, Gangland, and the Days of Rage, are covered so lightly that it is hard to discuss them adequately. The result of skimpy research and crafting a coherent narrative in such a small space leads to either word vomit, too many statistics, or erroneous material. All three are on display in this book. The Haymarket Bombing is discussed from every angle and no conclusions. I still do not understand what happened during the Days of Rage, but the name is catchy. And I have documented some of the obvious problems with his description of Chicago's infamous gangland.
Overall, it is very difficult to write a thorough history of a major city like Chicago. Pacyga definitely supports his home town and praises it to the winds. He proudly describes how the city bounced back from one catastrophe to the next, until the 1960s when innovation and diverse economic engines appear to have stalled. The last 1/3 or 1/4 of the book is a painfully detailed discussion of mayoral platforms suggesting that the history of Chicago (and this book) really ended with the death of Mayor Daley in 1976. Try as he might, Pacyga struggles to show that Chicago is rebounding from the factionalism that roiled the Democrats after Daley's death.