Spoilers
Definitely weaker and much more uneven than Untouched by Human Hands, but still enough weird little Sheckley ideas in here to make it worthwhile.
A lot of these stories have the same basic Sheckley mechanism: humans arrive somewhere with their own assumptions about resources, morality, civilization, crime, politics, whatever, and then discover that another species or society has a completely different ethos. Sometimes this works extremely well. Sometimes you can practically see Sheckley sitting there going, “okay, what if society worked backwards in this specific way?” and then hard-fitting a story around the concept.
The Mountain Without a Name was a decent 3/5. A bit contrived and preachy, and the mountain reacting almost morally only really makes sense if the universe itself is somehow teleological, but the ecological/corporate message is fine and there are enough little twists to keep it moving.
The Accountant was much more my kind of absurdity. Supernatural beings, demons and magic being treated like professions and bureaucracy is just inherently funny to me. Coincidentally I have come up with similar demon-contract nonsense myself, so apparently Hell naturally develops an accounting department. Also 3/5.
Hunting Problem was another 3/5. Typical Sheckley POV reversal. Neat enough, but once you understand the trick there isn't that much more there.
A Thief in Time was more interesting. It is mostly familiar predestination/time-loop stuff, except the protagonist is strangely passive: events keep happening to him because another temporal version of himself has already done everything. He spends most of the story suffering the consequences of decisions he hasn't made yet. There is something very funny about that. The ending gets a bit noshnosh logically, especially because there must still be an earlier lagoon where he actually arrives before the cabin exists and builds the damn thing. Still, it could make a really nice short film. 3.5/5.
The Luckiest Man in the World was 2.5/5. There was something in there, the irony of being extraordinarily lucky because the rest of humanity is fucked, but it just wasn't interesting enough. Good shape, not enough meat fur mich.
Hands Off surprised me and ended up at 3.5/5. At first it looked like another resources-in-space story, which Sheckley's fictional humans are extremely fond of. Then the aliens turn out to have actually thought about violence and killing far more deeply than the humans have. Apparently this alien civilization had its own Camus (and actually listened). I liked the idea that an advanced civilization might know the human capacity for rationalizing violence and deliberately structure itself around avoiding that spiral. Their morality looks strange from the human perspective, but from theirs the humans are the lunatics trying to steal and murder everything.
Something for Nothing was also 3.5/5. It starts more generically than it ends. Another debt story, very much in the family of Cost of Living: you think you have found infinite abundance and discover that capitalism has somehow followed you into the miracle machine. The immortality punch "congrats, now you have enough time to pay back your debt" is wonderfully mean and apt.
Ticket to Tranai is probably the biggest missed opportunity in the collection. 2/5, but there was absolutely a 3.5-ish novel hiding inside it. There are some genuinely smart ideas: there is no utopia for everyone; “justice,” “dignity” and so on are still words that have to cash out into actual institutions; political responsibility would mean something different when politicians genuinely have to bear risk; and maybe political systems should incorporate known limitations of human character instead of pretending humans are ideal rational beings. Something like behavioral economics already realizes.
I also liked Sheckley's reverse morality with the wife. From Goodman's ethos he has liberated her, but from her pov he has made her life materially worse. She has some completely legitimate complaints. That's exactly the sort of moral perspectivism Sheckley is good at.
But the whole thing feels like a folder full of political concepts that were forced into one long short story. Tax system. Marriage system. Crime system. Government system. Next exhibit. It wanted to be a little novel where we could actually see these institutions interacting and discover who benefits and who gets screwed. The ending with Goodman becoming a take-the-vote-away-from-women guy is also weird logically, although I think the joke is mainly that Goodman learns absolutely nothing except to reverse his crusade. The female stuff on the other planet was also kind of icky agewise so I guess luckily the mc is a shitbag at the end? I am also a little bit on the slow side so whilst writing this I realize his name is very deliberately Goodman.
The Battle was a strong little 3/5. Very short, very direct, awesome message. Humanity lets machines do the actual fighting in a certain apocalyptic future, while the commanders sit safely away from the battlefield, and then God takes the actual victors rather than the people who gave the orders. Of course he does. You wanted responsibility without risk and moral credit without sacrifice. Tough shit.
Skulking Permit ended up at 2/5. There is a hilarious Monty Python sketch buried in it: a future society has to appoint a criminal because civilized societies apparently have crime, and these people barely understand what a criminal even is. Reading a definition of crime is obviously not the same thing as inhabiting the social reality that gives the concept meaning. The “you aren't civilized because you can't murder properly” joke lands beautifully. But it goes on too long, and the ending simplifies some of the more interesting ideas into peaceful innocent society vs violent Earth.
The title story, Citizen in Space, was probably the weakest at 1.5/5. Very paranoid, which gives it a decent tone, and in hindsight it incidentally predicts a million later “am I insane or is something wrong with this spaceship?” stories. But outside that atmosphere there just wasn't much there.
And then thankfully Ask a Foolish Question shows up at the end and gives me another story that intuitively knows how some of our consciousness works. 4/5. Very abstract and esoteric, but this is exactly the kind of Sheckley I like. The Answerer knows the answers; the problem is that the questioners don't possess the conceptual framework necessary to formulate the right questions. “He can't answer questions in terms of our assumptions” is basically the whole thing.
That is symbol grounding, internal world-models and conceptual framing decades before anyone needed to use those terms. Different minds divide reality differently, so possessing a word like “life” does not mean you have actually grounded the same concept. And the line that to ask the right question you already need to know most of the answer is genuinely excellent.
Also the story was very funny to read shortly after Saturn Run, which contains its own alien answering-machine situation. Sheckley basically got there in 1953 and immediately asked the more annoying philosophical question: what if the machine can answer anything but the beings asking questions are too conceptually stupid to ask it anything useful?
So overall, Citizen in Space is a muddier collection than Untouched by Human Hands. Fewer 4.5–5/5 stories and more things that are clever primarily as constructions. Sheckley repeatedly returns to the same obsession: people mistake the categories their society taught them like resources, crime, civilization, justice, ownership, morality for fixed, objective features of reality. Then he introduces another society and lets those assumptions fall apart.
Sometimes he gets a genuinely great philosophical story out of that. Sometimes he gets a joke. Sometimes he gets 30 pages out of a concept that probably needed 10.
But even when the execution fails, there is usually something going on underneath it, which is why I'll happily keep reading him.