What do you think?
Rate this book
Discourses - Primary Source Edition
This is a reproduction of a book published before 1923. This book may have occasional imperfections such as missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. that were either part of the original artifact, or were introduced by the scanning process. We believe this work is culturally important, and despite the imperfections, have elected to bring it back into print as part of our continuing commitment to the preservation of printed works worldwide. We appreciate your understanding of the imperfections in the preservation process, and hope you enjoy this valuable book.
350 pages, Paperback
First published March 9, 2010
8 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 of 1 review
September 15, 2012
This time around, I have read only the first of the two divisions of the book, which contains the three discourses for which the book is named: "On the Divine Will", "Hints for Meditation on Acquaintance with God", and "On Revelation". I suppose I will read the second half, "Social Systems of the Present Day Compared with Christianity", eventually -- it certainly looks excellent -- but not now. My book plate is already unwieldy, and this division forms the bulk of "Discourses".
Of the three discourses, I enjoyed "On Revelation" the most, I think. If you want to read an excellent, brief exposition on the variety of ways God reveals Himself to humanity -- you should look here. The man makes a mountain of sense, and you can definitely see hints of some of the things in him which impacted George MacDonald's thinking so greatly. I think, even, we can see in these discourses, especially "On Revelation", the philosophical foundation upon which MacDonald's meaning-rich fantasy -- and that of others after him -- was built. There is a pedagogical relation between Scott, MacDonald, G.K. Chesterton, J.R.R. Tolkien, and C.S. Lewis on the "mythopoeic" (a term coined by Tolkien and Lewis) method of conveying truth through the imagination, which makes a prototheoretical appearance in Scott's written teachings.
(It should be noted here that Scott wrote very little, but was a prolific and particularly influential thinker in his day, who communicated mainly by lecture, sermon, and hosting regular "think tanks" of British notables. See the biographical sketch "The Other Christian Socialist" by J.P. Newell for details on his influence on such notables as MacDonald, F.D. Maurice, Thomas Carlyle, John Ruskin, Thomas Erskine of Linlathen, William Thackeray, Charles Kingsley, R.C. Trench, Francis William Newman, John Malcolm Ludlow, Thomas Hughes, J.C. Hare, and Erasmus Darwin. Ruskin described him as a man "to whom nearly all our best divines own -- and confess -- their deepest teaching". It is a wonder he is not better acknowledged historically, but I think this is due to the absence of literary presence.)
In other words, I would consider "On Revelation" by A.J. Scott to be a sort of prequel to a chain of related essays by some of the fantasy genre's founding influences: MacDonald's "The Fantastic Imagination", Chesterton's "The Ethics of Elfland", Tolkien's "On Fairy-Stories", and Lewis's "Sometimes Fairy Stories May Say Best What's To Be Said". Lewis was influenced in this regard by Tolkien, Chesterton, and MacDonald. Tolkien was influenced by Lewis, Chesterton, and MacDonald. Chesterton (preceding both Lewis and Tolkien) was influenced by MacDonald. And MacDonald was influenced by A.J. Scott's teaching on ways of communicating truth: "revelation".
Of the three discourses, I enjoyed "On Revelation" the most, I think. If you want to read an excellent, brief exposition on the variety of ways God reveals Himself to humanity -- you should look here. The man makes a mountain of sense, and you can definitely see hints of some of the things in him which impacted George MacDonald's thinking so greatly. I think, even, we can see in these discourses, especially "On Revelation", the philosophical foundation upon which MacDonald's meaning-rich fantasy -- and that of others after him -- was built. There is a pedagogical relation between Scott, MacDonald, G.K. Chesterton, J.R.R. Tolkien, and C.S. Lewis on the "mythopoeic" (a term coined by Tolkien and Lewis) method of conveying truth through the imagination, which makes a prototheoretical appearance in Scott's written teachings.
(It should be noted here that Scott wrote very little, but was a prolific and particularly influential thinker in his day, who communicated mainly by lecture, sermon, and hosting regular "think tanks" of British notables. See the biographical sketch "The Other Christian Socialist" by J.P. Newell for details on his influence on such notables as MacDonald, F.D. Maurice, Thomas Carlyle, John Ruskin, Thomas Erskine of Linlathen, William Thackeray, Charles Kingsley, R.C. Trench, Francis William Newman, John Malcolm Ludlow, Thomas Hughes, J.C. Hare, and Erasmus Darwin. Ruskin described him as a man "to whom nearly all our best divines own -- and confess -- their deepest teaching". It is a wonder he is not better acknowledged historically, but I think this is due to the absence of literary presence.)
In other words, I would consider "On Revelation" by A.J. Scott to be a sort of prequel to a chain of related essays by some of the fantasy genre's founding influences: MacDonald's "The Fantastic Imagination", Chesterton's "The Ethics of Elfland", Tolkien's "On Fairy-Stories", and Lewis's "Sometimes Fairy Stories May Say Best What's To Be Said". Lewis was influenced in this regard by Tolkien, Chesterton, and MacDonald. Tolkien was influenced by Lewis, Chesterton, and MacDonald. Chesterton (preceding both Lewis and Tolkien) was influenced by MacDonald. And MacDonald was influenced by A.J. Scott's teaching on ways of communicating truth: "revelation".
Displaying 1 of 1 review