What a wonderful little book! There are 5 chapters: one on Fanon’s life, three subsequent chapters on each of his main books, and a short, final chapter about his growing (yet still minimal) legacy in the 1990s that predicts the boom of Fanonian work in the 21st century.’ Following the style of the ‘For Beginners’ series for ‘Documentary Comic Books,’ Wyrick has multiple pictures/drawings on each page. They are quite simple in design, but quite profound in meaning. Illustrations from quick sarcastic quips to comic strip explanations of ‘colonialism’ illuminate each page. At times, the text portion of the book is shaped to these images, which makes the written words difficult to follow. However, as someone who has read all of Fanon’s books and several other monographs on his work, I think Wyrick provides an extremely helpful (and critical) introduction to Fanon. I am excited to pass this book into friends who would otherwise not take the time to read his work.
I want to briefly list a few tidbits of Wyrick’s approach and the books contents that I really appreciated. In each of the three chapters on Fanon’s books, Wyrick maintains a similar strategy. She first outlines the major philosophical-urgent-existence questions that Fanon grapples with. She then interjects a critical lens on the work: asking, what does Fanon miss? This might be gender intersections in Black Skin, White Masks, or class struggles in A Dying Colonialism. This mode of gentle/generous critique allows Wyrick to praise Fanon even stronger about what he does well, what he sees, and how he explains it. I think the BS/WM chapter would act as a helpful introduction for psychology students/psychologists from the West who otherwise would have trouble lifting their own veil of yt ignorance. I also appreciate Wyrick’s stance on The Wretched of the Earth (WE from now on). She affirms Fanon’s analytical claim that violence of the colonized against the colonizer is inevitable, as violence is the only medium through which the colonizer speaks and can hear. Wyrick outlines Fanon’s brilliant interventions into the disciplines and practices of humanism, philosophy, psychiatry, psychoanalysis, and sociology. And finally, to conclude, I want to highlight the laughter that Wyrick evoked from me. Those with a decolonial or critical lens (and those who have read Fanon before) won’t be able to help but laughing out loud at many of the jokes that litter the pages. I think this is an excellent strategy to build more often into philosophically minded texts: as writers, how can we laugh with our audiences, how can we make their day more joyous? After reading Wyrick, I’ve got a smile on my face and more precise/brief ways of explaining Fanon to my friends.
Why 4/5? There are a few drawbacks.
Drawbacks: Illustration/text layout. Language use: while many times quite simple, at other times Wyrick digs into heavy-laden academic debates/terms with little explanation. So the readership level changes often. I think this could be presented and used in a high school class (to teenagers) with a facilitator. However, it would be nice if this were geared more towards kids/less educated audiences than still being geared towards academics. This lack of balance made me slightly frustrated at times.