I certainly would have gotten more out of this collection if I had more knowledge of the nineteenth century political and literary figures Woolf was writing about in some of these pieces, selections which include essays and book reviews, but my acquaintance with some of her subjects is sketchy at best. Of course, as an English major in college, I had to take English history courses to buttress and contextualize my knowledge of the literature, but it was so long ago and those factoids are buried so deep in the gray matter, it would probably take deep hypnosis to dislodge them. I seemed to remember Robert Walpole was a prime minister . . . oh, wait, Virginia is talking about Horace Walpole here (“man of letters and art historian,” Wikipedia tells me). I don’t know who the hell Horace Walpole was. And my reading of Samuel Coleridge and Percy Bysshe Shelly was limited to survey courses. Even so, VW’s evocation of these men through their interactions with their good friends and relatives (in the case of Walpole, a Reverend William Cole; in Coleridge’s, his daughter Sara and an aunt) were still entertaining for the way Woolf teases out their personalities through those relationships. Other people she profiles in her inimitable prose I’d never heard of at all: Madame de Sevigne, a Dr. Wilkinson and Capt. James Jones.
But, as Virginia says of Henry James in her reviews of essays and letters he’d penned, “All great writers have, of course, an atmosphere in which they seem most at their ease and at their best; a mood of the great general mind which they interpret and indeed almost discover, so that we come to read them rather for that than for any story or character or scene of separate excellence. “ And that’s pretty much the way I feel about Virginia: it’s her style and insight together that weave the atmosphere that allows me to be both intellectually stimulated and emotionally soothed.
Since Henry James was the writer referenced in this volume with whom I am most familiar (and that’s not to say my knowledge is extensive, only great enough to be reverentially appreciative), I did enjoy those essays that focused on him and his work.
My favorites, though, were:
1) The five-page “Three Pictures,” not an essay, but more like a flash fiction. Loved this.
2) The essay “Craftsmanship,” which has an early sentence reading “Let us then take for our starting point the statement that words are not useful.” Clearly, it was going to be interesting to see where she was going with this.
3) “Professions for Women,” a paper read to the Women’s Service League in 1931 which talks about “the phantoms and obstacles” looming in the way of women embarking onto professional paths. Not all of her concerns are obsolete.
4) An essay called “Why,” on questions that should be asked, including why, when our time here on earth is so limited, people would want to sit through anything as dull as a lecture.
5) “Thoughts on Peace in an Air Raid,” ruminations on war and peace.
6) And best of all, a letter to the editor of The Statesman, called here “Middlebrow,” which was far funnier than anything I’ve read of hers before.