Just finished this on a plane. Fantastic. The front chapters on Darwin were wonderful. Elizabeth Grosz is a champ for reading Darwin. If you ask me, the main thing wrong with the entire 20th century is that people didn't read or misread Darwin. Grosz's call for feminists to look at Darwin (and others) for how their thinking can advance the feminist project, rather than engaging in criticisms of their work as sexist, is crucial for the health of feminism. Identity politics is a dead end when practiced to the exclusion of a more Darwinian strategy that acknowledges the absurdity of trying to corral human variations into rigid categories.
In the middle part of the book on ontology and epistemology, Grosz advocates a re-engagement in the realm of ontology, where feminists have only ever been concerned with epistemology. I don't have as much reading under my belt in this area of philosophy, so I didn't get as much out of it and it took me a while to get through.
The last part of the book, about female sexuality, was right up my alley. Wonderful stuff. I was a bit miffed at the end when Grosz rhapsodizes about the ineffable complexity of female sexuality as opposed to the mathematically characterizable nature of male sexuality. How did we suddenly get kicked off the bus of being complex. Same old hack about men being easy. Oh well. That's one tiny complaint about a book that in the main, was amazing.