K.A. Applegate begins this, the third in the ‘Remnants’ series, essentially saying she’s a better writer than God. One group of the Remnants—multiple people actually refer to themselves by this term in this installment, even though there was no Marco around to bless them with that name a la the Animorphs (should Mo’Steel have been the one to come up with the name, as the Marco of this group?)—is advancing toward a real-life Tower of Babel and Violet Blake calls it “an allegory about human pride”, adding that it’s a pretty good allegory for instructing people in humility. To which Jobs, the de facto protagonist by dint being given primary focus in the first chapter of each of the books so far, responds dryly, “But not as good as an asteroid.” An asteroid is what destroyed the Earth in THE MAYFLOWER PROJECT and set the Remnants on their course through space. Consequently, Applegate is directly setting her YA sci-fi series against the freakin’ BIBLE. (Incidentally, this calls to mind for me a quote from Dan Harmon, creator of the television series Community and co-creator of Rick & Morty: “I’ll see you in hell, which is where I believe all writers go because we make God jealous.”)
I generally wouldn’t disagree with her assessment that she’s a better author than the Almighty, but I spent much of my time reading THEM thinking that the voice in this one sounded off. I don’t really know how to explain this, except that that sharp, punchy profundity that I so love from Applegate’s writing doesn’t seem as present. The example I saved to illustrate my point is this quote: “A planet destroyed, a million species obliterated, the human race reduced to these Remnants, lost, that was worth some sadness.” It feels like an imitation, like somebody trying to match Applegate’s voice and missing the mark. I am aware that a number of books in the ‘Animorphs’ series were ghostwritten and I wondered if that might be the case here, but as far as I can tell none of these books was ghostwritten. Maybe it’s an instance of Michael Grant writing and trying to mimic his wife’s voice unsuccessfully? I don’t know, but this feeling likely colored my response to the whole of the book.
Or maybe it really is just not as good as the previous two. In THEM, the “Freaks”, the faction of Remnants led by Jobs, find themselves pursued by creatures out of Hieronymus Bosch’s The Last Judgment, a Where’s Waldo? vision of Hell filled with all manner of bizarre and frightful figures. There is an interesting moment here where Jobs thinks, “This is what came of superstition . . . Some late-Middle-Ages painter didn’t know his painting would become a real-life horror a billion miles away from Earth . . . This is what came of believing nonsense.” If Mo’Steel is the Marco of this book, Jobs is the Jalil (from ‘Everworld’), who similarly wanted to figure out the mechanics of the world he inhabited and disdained religion. The majority of the story of Jobs’ group is them running, pausing to rest, running again, pausing to rest, running again. There is a bit about an alien creature who they refer to as a “Blue Meanie” even though he seems gentle enough delivering little bits of exposition about the nature of their situation, but largely this story doesn’t amount to much, in my view.
The other main group of Remnants is the one led by the clearly-evil Yago and Violet Blake’s mother Wylson Lefkowitz-Blake. Theirs is a story of a political power struggle made more difficult by the fact that they are literally under attack by another group of aliens, which they’ve termed Riders, while trying to wrestle for authority among themselves. At one point, 2Face and Jobs’ younger brother Edward try to leave the group but this exodus is short-lived and doesn’t add much except that it introduces the fact that Edward inexplicably has chameleon-style camouflaging abilities which will presumably become more important later. (As an aside, the cover of this book shows Edward fading into a stone wall behind him--this is the first book of the series for which the cover actually portrays something that happens in the book! Will this be the norm now, or will they pull out the cover image randomizer again for book #4? Only time will tell!) The interpersonal dynamics going on among the Remnants is intriguing, I suppose, but I don’t know how much it will really maintain my interest.
There were a number of really heavy scenes of violence, horror, and grief in the previous two books. There’s stabs at recapturing that in this book, but it’s not as effective. The creatures of Bosch’s painting do not instill the same feeling of holy shit, I can’t believe this book is going to such a dark place as the prior books. They’re mostly goofy and even when—::SPOILER::—Jobs, et al., are caught by the monsters and briefly in peril (strung out on a spit over a roaring fire, balanced precariously on the edge of a giant knife, sinking into a tar pit), it doesn’t reach down into your soul the way some of the writing and events of the prior books did. (Although, that said, there was a quote here that I did genuinely enjoy: “Scenes of torture, scenes of horror, sights that made the flesh creep and the mind recoil. At the base of a tree a hand reached up out of the dirt, a hand belonging to someone buried a live, a hand that beckoned for recusal.”) Back with Yago’s group, there’s a bit of forced drama when Tamara and her creepy eyeless baby demand a sacrifice from among the others for the baby to eat, a request which from the beginning seems mostly made as a way to fuck with them as they squabble over who should be eaten, if anybody. This moment, too, fails to deliver the emotional wallop that the previous books had.
I also feel like the action, when it arrives, is not especially well choreographed such that it’s kind of hard to follow where the characters are in physical space. Lastly, I was bothered by a literary technique employed here which may have occurred before but which I found less offensive if so: the use of cliffhanger chapter endings. Because the group was split up into two or even three factions at times, THEM often has some exciting event occur at the end of a chapter, like somebody running up to yell at Yago’s group that Riders are coming, then switches to follow one of the other groups; when they run up against some dramatic action, it’s time for the chapter to end and switch back to another group. This mode of writing doesn’t enhance the excitement by leaving you wondering what happens next, but instead frustrates excitement by cutting away to something less thrilling right as the reader’s interest is piqued. I’m afraid that this tactic is nevertheless going to be used heavily in the coming entries and now that I’m aware of it I may be unable to not see it.
I considered whether to rate this book 2 or 3 stars when finished. I went with 3, but I’m still not certain I made the right choice. Let’s call it 2.5 stars in actuality, regardless. It’s a little disappointing to see this dip in quality after what I thought was a strong opening to the series, and I was particularly focused on those things that caused me to feel frustration, but we’ve still a long way to go and we’ll see how this book ends up looking once more of the picture becomes available.