While I loved the first two books in the series, 'Loving Constance' wasn't anywhere near as good.
Mostly? I was very upset with the spirituality behind this. First, Rand wasn't a believer. His idea of being 'born again' was a second chance at love, by the grace a'Gawd... and that's NOT even right.
I'm not even sure how much faith meant to Constance - mostly she didn't spend much time with her mind on heavenly things, either.
But the fact that the author was abusing scripture trying to justify child baptism about sent me over the edge. YES - Messiah said "let the little children come unto me". But THE CHILDREN COME of their own will... it's not the parents making the children perform a right when they're too young to make conscious decision. YES, we are to be born again, but that has *nothing* to do with being born from the womb, and shouldn't be lumped in as a part of the first birth. BADLY, B.A.D.L.Y. done, there. That's false teaching, RIGHT there.
As for the story, it was nice to revisit Patience and Grace, even though they're so far in the periphery that they're barely even mentioned in this story. This book centers around Annie, who's been a hot mess since the beginning. And it also focuses on Constance, who's story is barely covered ('my parents are long gone' but no explanation as to how or how she came to be so close to the Petrovs)...
And I'm not okay with Constance, who is now going to crap all over her most important job as mother so that she can be a career woman. NOT OKAY - if you want a career, fine. I'm good with that. But if you choose to have children, that's your job. You quit your job to mother. You can't be self-less and selfish at the same time. No man can serve two masters. THIS is why the world is a deplorable place, and why the demise of society has degraded to the point it has. ALSO badly done.
Y'know... I... no. I didn't care for this one.