A Succint but Very Good Overview of this Quite Long Campaign
Any review of this book would have to start out by pointing out that it is part of Osprey Publishing's "Campaign" series. As such, it is relatively short, at only 96 pages of length. Of these 96 pages, very roughly a third or so consist of illustration of one type or another (i.e., 2-D and 3-D maps, contemporaneous photographs, etc.). Hence if one is looking for an academic tome on the subject this is not it. For such a tome this reviewer recommends Dr. David Glantz's "The Battle of Leningrad, 1941-1944)" (published by University of Kansas). That book is about 700 pages long and is an academic tome. Hence the relevant question is how well does Dr. Forczyk's book do considering its short length and the other constraints imposed on it by the "Campaign" series (i.e., only a few pages to write on topics such as "strategic situation before the battle", "leadership", etc.? The answer is very, very well.
The author uses the limited number of pages available to him on each area quite well. He describes very well the strategic situation at the time of the battle, the leadership of both sides, the armies, goals, how the battle played out, the aftermath and the factors relevant for each sides success and failure. In the two or so hours it takes to read this book the reader obtains a very good picture of this battle. An impressive feat considering the short length of the book combined with the fact that the siege lasted almost 3 years.
The book does have a few weaknesses, though, that need mentioning. One is that the book only covers high level leadership, not lower level (i.e., NCOs, lower level officers). The book also does not cover ad hoc organizational ability (or lack thereof). Then again, very few books in the Osprey "Campaign" series do this. The only book this reviewer has read in this series that does this is David Chandler's book on Austerlitz (in this reviewer's opinion one of the best "Campaign" books published - despite the fact it was published decades ago). A third problem is one inherent in the "Campaign" format - that is a lack of footnotes. This is especially a shame considering the considerable (and impressive) research that has gone into this book (and for that matter many of the newer Osprey "Campaign" books by authors such as Mr. Steven Zaloga and Mr. Mark Stille). This reviewer hopes that someone from Osprey Publishing is reading these comments on footnotes. In this reviewer's opinion they are a serious weakness in this series' format.
A very good introduction to this long campaign that hits all the major nails on the head albeit in only a succinct manner. Four and a half stars.