In this comprehensive, original, and wide-ranging study, Geoffrey Galt Harpham argues that we should view the grotesque not as a marginal or aberrant form, but rather as a key to central concepts in the Western artistic tradition. With discussions of pictorial and narrative art, and readings of theoretical statements by Kant, Hegel, Ruskin and others, this book expands our concept of the grotesque, and enriches our understanding of art itself.
You can practically *smell* the tweed coming off this book. Erudite, comprehensive, and extremely ambitious. Harpham's varying formulations of the grotesque's "essence"--the grotesque as an interval, a process, a set of traits, and a historically contradictory term--set off nicely his poststructuralist idea that the grotesque is a metaphor for art's totality itself.
The book was clearly written as a call to other academics to further a field of study, but once acclimated to the slightly dry and erudite writing style this becomes a fascinating book. It spans genres of art looking for the origin, perpetuation, and implications of the grotesque. This is a good introductory book, and spawns many questions, points for investigation, creative ideas while taking the reader through history, art, literature, psychology, philosophy, myth, and magic. This is an interesting conversation because while there is much investigation on the concept of beauty and on ugliness, the grotesque is neither.
Mostly incredible. My biggest struggle with this book is that it would so often describe images, without providing them. I imagined seeing a powerpoint alongside reading this work would've been very helpful! And seeing as a few were included, I can't imagine adding more for reference would be an issue. Other than that, I found this a pretty comprehensive introduction to various theories on the grotesque, and how to handle contradiction!