Scipio Slataper was one the peripheral members of the Florentine avant-garde, first as a contributor to La Voce, then, temporarily, as its acting editor in the absence of Prezzolini – until Papini came to take over, apparently disgruntled with the policies of Slataper. That’s how I heard of him – many apparently know him first of all as a cultural representative of Trieste, that adriatic city at the eastern-most of Italian territory. At the time of Slataper, the city was controlled by the Hapsburg. As mentioned in Musil’s Man without Qualities, which takes a few years after Il Mio Carso, it was a time of strong nationalistic tensions inside the Austro-Hungarian empire, and rife with irredentism around its borders. Trieste was no exception, with strong and old Slavic and Latin communities which grew increasingly hostile to the kakanische administration. Scipio Slataper’s first name and mother were Italian while his last name and his father were of Slavic extraction. While this double identity provide a constitutive tension in his life and his book, consensus seemed to be reached when it came to demand liberation from the Austrian rule.
From a modest family he went to study in Florence on a scholarship, that eventually be withdrawn due to his “subversive” activities in La Voce and irredentist agitation: Trieste, indeed, is a few kilometers from Fiume/Rijeka, which was to remain a powerful symbol of Italy’s “unfinished Risorgimento” ; And indeed there is something of the Vociani in Slataper, as well as something of D’Annunzio, but at this point I must point out that in my eyes he seems to outdo both of them. But let us now look at the book:
Despite being in part a collage of previous texts, including notably love poetry and prose he had sent to his “three friends” the short text (145 pages) has a remarkable cohesion: It is divided in three parts, with each their own tone and mood, but all irrigated by the same authenticity, candour and quiet confidence.
The first of the three parts is a tale of childhood, of his first childish love, full of pride and tumult, concluding in a truly gripping separation. The story is set on a background of Balkanic country-side, and manages to describe youthful bliss over-flowing with life, haunted by taste and touch in a unique and, for me, unequaled fashion: when reading the book, I couldn't help thinking that Slataper was doing Gide better than Gide; It is something akin to Les Nourritures Terrestres, but purged of any claims to wisdom, any aphoristic vaticination, because Slataper’s purpose was never to write a manifesto, never to be emulated.
Slataper’s avant-gardism, his cult of youth, change and movement, takes form in this fascination for nature, for the austere and brutal landscape of his Karst, rather than in programmatic, political or theoretical projects, as it can do in Papini or Soffici for example. This leaves him room for painting himself not as the heroic embodiment of some abstract project, but as an actual, multidimensional character, inhabited by doubt and fear, gripped most of all by existential terror.
After this first part, an idyll neither naff nor bold, angst get introduced in the narrator’s life: the recurrent theme of Garibaldian nationalism is introduced, the demands of adult life starts to show at horizon. The episode of the his mother’s sickness I found devastating: despite the hungry ghost of solipsism often looming in the shadows, we have none of Papini’s virillism, none of the avant-garde’s often contrived claim to emotional autarky. Not, even, much irony or distanciation: despite his approval of prostitution, for example, which he finds more honest an exchange than most human relationships, claiming to be disinterested or spontaneous, there is no lust for domination (“Because I am in nothing superior to others” p.91) and no “scorn for women”:
“I give you this; You give me that; Nothing cleaner. It is society that is dirty, of having, out of concern for cleanliness, called this… love. (the ellipsis is not mine: but society’s. Myself, I don’t use ellipses)” p.84
But let’s be clear: it is not Slataper’s moral compliance that makes the value of his book: what is quite appealing is that this allows him a self-portrait with emotional content, which I find quite a rarity in this milieu; In fact Slataper is not free from the topoi of the Florentine avant-garde: the part known as “the ascension” which depicts his climbing of the Secchieta, is overlapped with a promethean symbolism, which is reminiscent of Papini, Soffici or Prezzolini’s project of “becoming gods”. “There is only the mountain and me; Nothing else. And at the summit, there should be no one else than me.”(p.95); But here again there are hints of Slataper caring more for the project because of the existential sense of purpose it gives him for a time, that because he wishes or believes in the project: “Even if all the city and all its lassitude are forever in you, and that you cannot flee – this has no importance: you walk towards the heights : that is all that matters; it must be; it is all that is beautiful.” (p.96)
The third part, finally, is marked by the suicide of Slataper’s “beloved” [it’s complicated…] who plunges him in an abyss of despair, which neither existential considerations nor the comforting presence of the Karst, this raw, brute nature Slataper admires so much (and seems to provide a model for his avant-gardism) can hope to extinguish. As for much of the book there is no attempting to “summarize” a story which is part stream of consciousness, and part collage of vaguely connected events. What really holds it together is Slataper’s stunning prose, woven with highly original images, and if not always daring, always self-conscious. In terms of overall theme it is the existential condition, reaped apart between two irreconcilable but necessary impulses, which is central to the narrative: that of Trieste like that of the author, which are both left unresolved but which are also exposed with a unique clarity and emotional honesty, which few authors of this period have achieved.