Linguistics for Non-Linguists: A Primer with Exercises

by Frank Parker, Kathryn Riley

Linguistics for Non-Linguists is a highly readable introductory text that presents students with the basic elements of linguistics in a clear and concise style that any beginner will understand. This newly revised edition continues to expand on the success of earlier editions, taking a subject that is generally considered quite complicated and making it accessible to virtually anyone who requires a basic understanding of linguistics. The authors illustrate major concepts in an easy-to-read style, giving students and specialists in language-related fields an introduction to the essential principles and methods of linguistic theory. Non-linguistics majors will also find this book user-friendly, with a wealth of exercises and references interspersed throughout to help reinforce concepts. Specialists in language-related fields, including Speech-Language Pathology, Experimental Phonetics, Communication, Education, Psychology, and English as a Second Language, will find this text a must-have reference for all courses.

Genres: Language, Linguistics, Nonfiction, Textbooks

360 pages, Paperback

First published September 28, 1986

Reviews

[Rebecca Timberlake · Rating 4 out of 5]

I read this for my introduction to Linguistics class, and it was one of the better linguistics books I've read. It was clear, and the exercises were very helpful in understanding the material covered in each chapter. Things I thought I had a good grasp on from previous linguistic courses were covered, and I'm glad they were because it really solidified my knowledge of basic linguistics terminology and topics. It will certainly help as I take more courses in the subject.

[Mehran Qandi · Rating 4 out of 5]

a clear and concise textbook so far. I needed a more in-depth discussion of psr and x-bar theory but the book was enough introduction to continue reading further.

[Jenny · Rating 4 out of 5]

The content was great; thorough enough for an intro class, accessible without being too rudimentary. However, the exercises were unwieldy and often required additional explanation in class. I found them to be very obtusely constructed.

[Diannah · Rating 4 out of 5]

Good text! Even if the exercise include names like Biff and Muffy.

[Jackie · Rating 2 out of 5]

Boring but easy to follow

[Ejuster JÌmena]

Its awesome.\m/