I'm familiar with his writing strategy here -- mixing personal narrative with a discussion of the then-current scholarship. The narratives are poignant and telling, but a) his discussion of the scholarship is light and rarely critical, while b) his ties to the narrative and scholarship are often tenuous. This would be an acceptable undergrad introduction to demonstrate memoir and qualitative research, but it lacks the weightiness needed for a critical examination as to how place, society, environment, and systems affect/reflect language.