The 60 Greatest Conspiracies of All Time: History's Biggest Mysteries, Cover-Ups, and Cabals

by Jonathan; Whalen Vankin, John Whalen

For anyone who believes any of these theories or merely enjoys a walk on the wild side of alternative history. The Eighty Greatest Conspiracies of All Time will provide hours of provocative reading. No one will ever look at the world in quite the same way again.

Genres: History, Nonfiction, Conspiracy Theories, Reference, Politics, Essays, True Crime

502 pages, Hardcover

First published December 1, 1994

Reviews

[Dj · Rating 2 out of 5]

So much promise of entertainment and so little return. It would seem that almost all the 'Great' Conspiracies waited until the 20th Century to take place. A few of the Conspiracies in this book are real, like the release of Sarin Gas in the subway in Japan. However the book goes on to add that it might have been part of a plot for Soviet Russia to invade Japan...Wonder if anyone thought to check troop and fleet deployments for the Great Bear at the time, since invasions are rarely done without any kind of foreshadowing.

My favorite one for being so over the top silly is that the CIA (FBI/Secret Service pick one they seem pretty much interchangeable in this case) killed Marilyn Monroe due to all the pillow talk she overheard from JFK and his brother Robert...at least the book doesn't suggest that they were both in bed with her at the same time. Seems the protectors of the honor of the Red, White and Blue were worried that she would spill those overheard government secrets used for increasing the libido to enemies of the state, like Cuba...Because I am sure that Castro would be sure to take seriously anything a drug addled Hollywood star said that wasn't buttering up his ego? And while I am pretty sure that either one or both Kennedy's had an affair with Monroe, I find it hard to believe that the pillow talk included how many jets we had ready to launch and attack Cuba...just saying.

The worst is another one of the never ending FDR sold out the fleet in Pearl Harbor to force the Nations hand to go to War with Germany. It makes me wonder how many times the perpatrators of such a theory (being very generous with the use of that word) were dropped on their heads. It makes as much sense as a second gun man standing on the grassy knoll in the middle of a crowd to shoot JFK. What did he say, Pardon me, this is not the shooter you are looking for and his Jedi mind tricks made the dozens of people there forget about him? Or maybe it was a her and it shocked so many people they forgot? Just plain dumb.

Maybe not even a good source for story material.

[Darth · Rating 4 out of 5]

Podejrzane...

[Tim Pendry · Rating 4 out of 5]

This is the 2004 'upgrade' of a 1995 book that had 70 rather than 80 'conspiracies' and was originally published at the peak of the X-Files era's popular fascination with secret government. Between the two editions, 9/11 took place and the tone changes somewhat.

The two authorial voices are hard to distentangle. One is straight-talking and shows no particular political bias. The other sometimes adopts a slightly irritating 'gonzo' style and is clearly prejudiced in direction of liberal narratives. Clinton seems to be taken off every possible hook.

Perhaps the authors or an author matured over a decade and started to worry about the monster they had played a part in unleashing. The final post-2001 mood is more sombre, irritated with 911 conspiracy theorising that (in their view) detracts from serious 'parapolitical' analysis.

One can play conspiracy theory in a number of ways - as a form of fictional entertainment that descends into its own abyss of lunacy, as legitimate political expression of impotence and ignorance or as sincere analysis of the very odd and nasty things governments get up to.

The book tends to smile or laugh at the first, ignore the second and be unreliable yet thought-provoking on the third. Few writers on conspiracy adopt the necessary 'constructively critical' approach that gives us a methodology to be taken seriously. This book is no exception.

Vankin and Whalen want their cake and to eat it, to entertain and sell the book and to purport to be seriously considering the lengths to which the so-called deep state will go to cover its tracks. As a result, the worthy latter project flounders in a grey area of uncertainty and sometimes nonsense.

Still, the relatively short but full chapters give source books and clues for further reading. Even a cursory catch-up on the internet will modify their theorising in constructive ways. And they raise questions that still need to be answered and where state villainy is fairly obvious to all but an idiot.

I suspect most such stories are generally more tales of bungling than of adroit plotting but it is clear that the American State's discovery of itself as a superpower with an existential enemy in communism and a will to domination created many opportunities for fanatics and sociopaths.

The book closes with a rather moving account of Frank Olson son's attempt to uncover the truth about his death: Frank implausibly threw himself out of a window under the influence of LSD but was just as likely (more likely in my view) to have been a victim of interrogation or murder.

This and other stories create a picture for us of the malfeasance of the so-called 'deep state' having a considerable basis in reality as unaccountable sociopathic parts of an unwieldy and ill-administered state that consider themselves beyond ordinary morality and the law.

It is plausible to see the fringes of these networks being seduced into the violent anti-communist Right or into co-operation with organised crime networks under conditions where it might not be clear who was using whom. The system then has to cover up group blunders and crimes.

There are certainly nodal points where many conspiracy theories start to come together and where there is no smoke without fire - the early post cold war panic about brainwashing blowing back into domestic experimentation, the obsession with Cuba, the Iran-Contra fiasco.

There seem to be lineages of collusion and relationships that go well beyond the coincidental and which create overlaps between the security apparatus and politics. This is not peculiarly American. The British have a similar nodal point in the Troubles. The Russians probably many more.

Books like this are fun. They will even make you think but they 'conspire' themselves to obfuscate even when, as in this case, they make considerable efforts to draw a distinction between the silly, the possible and the probable.

We seem to have two absurd wheels in motion culturally. One wheel turns on the tales of Illuminati, a reptilian House of Windsor, the priory of Sion and alien intelligences. The other wheel turns on tales of conspiracy theory being extremist and neurotic fantasies with no connection to reality.

The first offers us paranoid fantasy to such an extent that it discredits all parapolitical research to the point where it becomes legitimate enquiry to ask how much of our entertainment is created harmlesly and how much has been 'seeded' by psychological operations to confuse matters further.

Certainly the known scale and complexity of psychological operations in international relations and the facts of media manipulation mean that it is unlikely that so much secret resource is designed to tell us nothing but the truth or that it does not engage in imaginative games to peculiar ends.

The second approach - denial (usually cast as a moral tale of the invention of the Protocol of the Elders of Zion as if this settled the matter of JFK or MLK's assassinations) - is equally absurd because, even if flawed, there is now plenty of proven evidence of state dodginess.

What is required is something in the middle - an abandonment of pseudo-archaeology, pseudo-history and pseudo-science but a realisation that human actors will both conspire to meet their ends and get into hot water by following the logic of their unthinking institutional trajectories.

So, it is possible that JFK and MLK were both assassinated as part of much more far-ranging plots, that Olson was murdered, that the attempted assassination of Pope John Paul II was part of a 'strategy of tension', that the Japanese Far Right and Yakuza were collusive and so on and so forth.

The book is 'fun', usefully rubbishes a lot of stuff that needs to be rubbished, opens lines of enquiry (even if we find that other resources soon close them again as may be the case with the mysterious 'Raoul' in the James Earl Ray case) and demonstrates that 'something is up'.

What is 'up' is the existence of a repeated pattern of unaccountable power in the struggles between security and intelligence networks. These spill over at the margins into amorality, criminality and politics and make these networks subversive of the values they seek to defend.

Sometimes elected politicians (as in the 1970s investigations into the CIA) get somewhere in exposing crimes, sometimes they are collusive. It is not enough to dismiss the charges laid against unaccountable secret warriors as mere 'conspiracy theory'.

A book for the shelves but not the book we really needed and which may never have. Certainly we may need a final encyclopedic sceptical review of idiot conspiracy theory on the one hand wherever and whenever it starts to cause people to believe in it as 'truth' but most of this is just fun.

What is needed far more urgently is a definitive and provocative history of the role of state funded secret organisations in both the actuality and cover up of incompetence, freeloading, criminality and murder in every nation since the emergence of intra-state ideological competition.

Such a history would give due place to the possibilities of collusion in a world of shredded documentation, private unminuted meetings, deniable hirings, secret funds, misperceptions of reality and special interests with men on the inside.

Above all, what is required is the sustained exposure to domestic populations not so much of secret wars against others (which might be justifiable) but wars against we who pay for this nonsense with our taxes (and lives) and wars against the values that the State purports to be defending.

I tend to the view that incompetence and subsequent cover up is generally more likely than malice. After all, major state crimes (like the bombing of civilians) are generally not secret at all. But I am prepared to accept that malice and sociopathy are to be found within our state machines.

Above all, it is the leaching into politics of the conduct of secret organisations and special interests that need exposure, especially when they go over a line and enable the deaths of elected officials and ordinary citizens and plunder the Treasury for their hobby horses.

Why worry? Many might be happy to turn a blind eye if the apparat protects us. Perhaps because, if we are employing idiots and sociopaths, we need to know this is so in order to replace them with more intelligent and mentally balanced people who will do a better job of preserving our values.

[Jim · Rating 3 out of 5]

Hard to classify this book, as there is as much outright nonfiction as interesting facts. For me, often, the simplest answer in any event is probably the right one, but at the same time I do enjoy reading about unanswered (and often unanswerable) anomalies that often lead to wacko conspiracy theories and occasionally true ones as well. Most of the material in the book (though definitely not all) I was relatively aware of, but there were still nuggets I found interesting. It is amazing how many are fueled by outright fabrications and the willful use of falsehoods for specific agendas. Of course, we are caught up in that kind of stuff still today.

[Erik Graff · Rating 2 out of 5]

Having read a great deal about matters like the Waco murders; the assassinations of Lincoln, MLK, JFK and RFK; CIA dirty tricks and the like, I thought this would be a light, but interesting, read. The few topics which were relatively new to me were, most especially the case of Shoko Asahara, but the rest were basically slipshod reviews, most of them beginning with the 'official' story, then trailing off with various objections to it and the reasons for them. As regards the title's claim, there's nothing earlier than the Lincoln assassination and almost everything concerns the United States. At best this book may inspire some readers to pick up on some of the leads suggested.

[R.L. · Rating 3 out of 5]

English review below the Greek one...

Για να είμαι ειλικρινής, το βιβλίο χωρίς να είναι κακό, δεν με ενθουσίασε.

Οι περισσότερες ιστορίες/θεωρίες σε αυτό το βιβλίο μου ήταν οικείες και ήταν ένα περίεργο μείγμα από πολύ διαφορετικά περιστατικά και θέματα. Πολλές ιστορίες με την CIA ή τους φόνους διάσημων προσώπων είναι γνωστές και χιλιοειπωμένες εδώ και χρόνια π.χ. και δεν νομίζω ότι ο περισσότερος κόσμος θα τις αποκαλούσε "συνομωσίες". Άλλα κεφάλαια αγγίζουν πιο πολύ τον αστικό μύθο και μπήκαν στο βιβλίο για να μπουν, π.χ. κάποιες ιστορίες με UFO. Ή ενώ έχουν κάποια βάση, π.χ. οι ιστορίες με Ιλουμινάτι και ελευθερομασόνους, στερούνταν εμπεριστατωμένων στοιχείων και παίρνουν περίεργη τροπή. Γενικά κάποια κεφάλαια ήταν πολύ λεπτομερή με αρκετά στοιχεία και άλλα σύντομα και/ή γραμμένα χωρίς να υπάρχει και πολύ ουσία.

Η συντριπτική πλειοψηφία έχει να κάνει με τις ΗΠ�� ή με τη δράση των μυστικών υπηρεσιών των ΗΠΑ κτλ και είναι ελάχιστα τα θέματα που έχουν να κάνουν με άλλες χώρες. Επίσης μιλάμε κυρίως για γεγονότα/ συμβάντα στις δεκαετίες στα μέσα του 20ου αιώνα και ��ολύ λιγότερο για νωρίτερα ή αργότερα. Άρα πως είναι οι μεγαλύτερες συνωμοσίες "όλων των εποχών";

Τέλος, μία πρώτη έκδοση του βιβλίου κυκλοφόρησε κάπου το '90 και υπήρξαν νέες εκδόσεις με κάποια επιπλέον κεφάλαια λίγα χρόνια μετά. Η συγκεκριμένη έκδοση αρχικά κυκλοφόρησε νομίζω το 2007 ή κάπου εκεί, οπότε κάποιες αναλύσεις για τότε πρόσφατα θέματα είναι ξεπερασμένες ενώ δεν μπήκαν καν στον κόπο ο εκδότης/οι συγγραφείς να ενημερώσουν το κείμενο των κεφαλαίων που είχαν γραφτεί πολύ νωρίτερα. Λέει για κάτι "δυο δεκαετίες πριν" αλλά ήδη σε αυτή την έκδοση είναι τρεις ή τέσσερεις δεκαετίες πριν, πόσο μάλλον όταν το διαβάσεις το 2023. Αποπροσανατολιστικό για τον αναγνώστη.

Να συμπληρώσω ότι σε πάρα πολλά σημεία υπάρχουν τυπογραφικά και γραμματικά λάθη και κάποιες φορές ολόκληρες προτάσεις δεν βγάζουν νόημα. Συχνό φαινόμενο για αυτόν τον εκδοτικό οίκο, δυστυχώς. Υποθέτω ότι είναι πιο εύκολο να παίρνουν τα δικαιώματα βιβλίων που έχουν εκδοθεί χρόνια πριν, αλλά κάποια τα έχει ξεπεράσει η εποχή τους και είναι σαν να κοροϊδεύεις τον αναγνώστη. Έκδοση του 2019 στα Ελληνικά, αλλά βιβλίο με τέτοια θεματολογία και ύφος και τις πολλές αλλαγές από έκδοση σε έκδοση, που ήταν ήδη ψιλοαπαράδεκτο το 2007 από κάποιες απόψεις. Κοροϊδια δεν είναι;


To be honest, this book, while not bad, didn't enthouse me either.

Most of the stories/theories in this book were familiar to me and were a strange mix of very different incidents and themes. Many stories featuring the CIA or the murders of famous people are well-known and told countless times and I don't think most people would call them "conspiracies". Other chapters resemble urban legend and the authors seemed to add them in the book for no specific reason, e.g. some UFO stories or while they have a basis, e.g. the stories with Illuminati and freemasons. These lacked thorough evidence and take a strange turn. In general, some chapters were very detailed with enough information and others were short and/or written without much substance.

The vast majority have to do with the USA or the action of the US secret services, etc. and there are very few issues that have to do with other countries. Also we are mostly talking about events/occurrences in the decades around the middle of the 20th century and much less about earlier or later. So how are these the greatest conspiracies of "all time"?

An other important point is that a first edition of the book was released sometime in the '90s and there were new editions with some additional chapters a few years later. This particular edition was originally published I think on 2007 or thereabouts, so some analyses of then-recent-topics are out of date while the publisher/authors didn't even bother to update the text of the chapters that were written much earlier. One reads for example "two decades ago" but already in this version it's three or four decades ago, let alone when you read it in 2023. Disorienting for the reader.

There were tid-bits that I liked here and there, while some chapters were better than others, but I don't know... I had higher expectations of this. It seems kind of trite and outdated now...

[Trevor · Rating 4 out of 5]

It has been sometime since I invested this much time in a non-fiction book. The reason this one caught my eye is because I've always been intrigued by Conspiracies and was watching a show of the same title on Tech TV. On that show they repeatedly interviewed Jonathan Vankin commenting on his being the coauthor of this book. I was intrigued enough to spend the $30+ CDN to own this book.

The book is a collection of 80 conspiracies that are listed as the 'greatest'. It covered varied topics from The Shroud of Turin, the sarin attacks of Shoko Asahara's cult "supreme truth" (Aum Shinrikyo), the fake moon landings, and of coarse the JFK/RFK assassinations and the 9/11 disaster.

At first I would say that the problem with this book is that the predominate number of these conspiracies are of USA origin. But after some reflection, that makes sense as 1) the authors are American and therefore have a bias towards their own countries views, 2) the proliferation of media in the USA provides more opportunity for conspiracies to flourish and therefore seem great and 3) the USA has an interesting penchant for going to great lengths to prove that their leaders are both corrupt and incorruptible (yes, this is meant to be contradictory).

Being a dabbler into conspiracy theory, I was aware of a fair number of the ones mentioned in this book; however there were some nice surprises. There were some I had never heard of before (i.e. the 'assassination' of Pope John Paul I) and some interesting twists on those I did (i.e. that Mark David Chapman was 'brainwashed' to kill John Lennon). Actually, the most interesting 'twist' is that with regards to 9/11 the authors choose to debunk all the theories regarding this they can. Essentially what they argue is "the bigger the disaster, the bigger the disbelief". They do discuss various 'issues' of the event, but seem to say "it was a huge tragedy and any attempt at conspiracy theory (denial) is both pointless and a waste of time, accept it and deal with the consequences".

My only disappointments in this book are 1) that some of the conspiracies are covered to quickly and 2) there is a certain expectation, on behalf of the authors, that the reader is well versed in the players of US politics (past and present).

I would recommend this book to anyone who has a burgeoning interest in Conspiracy Theory, but for an average reader this will seem like just that much nonsense.

[P.S. Winn · Rating 4 out of 5]

I am a big fan of conspiracies theories. This collection has many of interesting ones to take a peek into and make you think.

[Christine Stowe · Rating 3 out of 5]

60 conspiracy theories. Interesting stuff but long winded in places.

[Jose Moran · Rating 2 out of 5]

In December, I went to The Last Bookstore in Downtown Los Angeles and was in love with their discount section upstairs. I had a few books I saw that I had always wanted to buy, but I saw this book. A book with a Barnes and Noble discount sticker half-ripped off of the book cover sleeve. It interested both my boyfriend and I, so I took a gamble and bought this book because I didn't think I would ever run into it again. The fact that I'd never seen it, should've been the first clue about it's past.

The blurb on the back just listed a few of the conspiracies that the book included (I think they mentioned Marilyn Monroe, the Unabomber, etc.) which I never knew existed, so I was intrigued. I didn't do any research besides reading the blurb. If I had opened the book, I would have realized that this book was published in the early 1990s. Hopes for reading about 9/11 or any contemporary events were lost. I didn't realize this until I was about 75% of the way done (mainly because they kept focusing on events that happened in the 1960s and 1970s, and they referenced a 1980s event as a decade in the past lol), but I kept on reading. A lot of the conspiracy theories were based on governmental scandals, which would make sense. I don't know what exactly I was expecting with reading this. It took me over a month to read this book. Some stories were very inclusive of all parties involved (a chapter had so many commanders and generals and politicians mentioned that I found myself dozing off mid-sentence), which felt like overkill. I would be lying if I said that it was always uninteresting, however.

The chapter on Martin Luther King's assassination, as well as Marilyn Monroe's death were highly informative and brought to my attention things that I never knew. This brings me to my next point about the perception of conspiracy. Conspiracy isn't just crazy people thinking about things. It's knowing the facts that we know, and postulating that there could be another way of interpreting the facts. The MLK chapter does warrant some factual merits, as do the stories I read about.

Overall, it wasn't for me, but it's not the books fault that I didn't look into what was in it! If these topics interest you, it sounded like it would be interesting if I cared about the subject matter.

[L.C. Frey · Rating 4 out of 5]

Great book!

Short, to the point and fun to read. Witty, also.

And to be honest, an endless source of inspiration. Whenever I need to come up with the real bad guys (or the real stupid ones) there is a certain probability that I did deeper research on an ideo that I found in this book, if not while watching the X-Files.

A must read for every one who likes to gain a certain basic knowledge of famous conspiracies - and very refreshing, sonce the authors still keep a certain professional distance to the theories explained, preventing you to get sucked up too much ending up like Mulder I am watching you at the beginning of the second X-Files movie, lonesome, bearded and somewhat... crazy?

(If you want to go for REALLY crazy and even more funny (or shocking in the light of some of the latest scandals I am still watching you concerning the NSA and their likes), read Illuminatus by R.A.Wilson, considered a true classic on the topic and a faboulus read, too ;-))

[EmiLy's BookLand · Rating 2 out of 5]

Και εκεί που αδημονείς να ξεκινήσεις ένα βιβλίο με τόσο ελκυστικό τίτλο και αναρωτιέσαι πόσα σημεία και τέρατα να συμβαίνουν στον κόσμο… Έρχεται η ώρα που λες » καλώς ναι, κάτι άλλο,που δεν ήξερα ;;» Δεν λέω, συνειδητοποίησα αρκετά για τον κόσμο που ζούμε, τα οποία ως τώρα προτιμούσα να μην τα σκέφτομαι και πολύ·καλώς ή κακώς σε βάζει σε ένα τρυπάκι αμφισβήτησης των πάντων, αλλά γιατί τόσα ονόματα ; Γιατί τόσο μπέρδεμα ; Από ένα σημείο και μετά συνέχιζα το διάβασμα χωρίς να θυμάμαι το όνομα του αναφερόμενου, εφόσον δεν ήταν αναγκαίο για να κατανοήσω τα γεγονότα. Γενικά, έχει περίεργη ροή και τα στοιχεία μπερδεύονται μεταξύ τους, χωρίς να υπάρχει διαχωρισμός. Μου προκάλεσε αρκετές σκέψεις, αλλά με έχασε στον τρόπο γραφής.

[Lance Lumley · Rating 4 out of 5]

I am not follower of conspiracy theories, although some of them are interesting to read about. This book was easy to read and put into nice chapters that the reader could read one chapter a day or several.
The theories that are covered here are topics like JFK, Reagan assassination attempt, to Princess Diana and John Lennon. There are some that you would expect like the murder of Lincoln to Marilyn Monroe to topics like the governments brainwashing people and aliens.
Even though some of these things sound absurd, some topics actually make sense. You do not need to be a person that believes in theories like this to find some interesting topics in the book.

[Nathan · Rating 3 out of 5]

I got this book for three dollars in the cheapo bin at Barnes & Noble. Why? Because I'm a huge X-Files fan, and Chris Carter has admitted using this book as a reference in writing the show. And it's all here. At least half the conspiracies in this book have shown up on a TV show or a movie, and they're presented here as simply and amusingly as possible. An excellent reference book for deconstructive X-Files fans, and a perfect cover-to-cover read for ultimate paranoiacs. Definitely worth the three dollars.

NC

[Keith Davis · Rating 4 out of 5]

While reading these short pieces about various conspiracy theories I started rating them either probably true, possible but unprovable, unlikely, highly unlikely, or completely ridiculous. For example: CIA plot to kill Castro - probably true, suppression of hemp farming by paper companies - possible but unprovable, Pearl Harbor allowed to happen by USA as excuse to join war - highly unlikely, fake moon landing - ridiculous.

[Dan · Rating 4 out of 5]

One of the best of the books of this type. The major claims and objections to the most enduring conspiracy theories (JFK, Marilyn Monroe, Illuminati, Masons) are presented in an engaging writing style that keeps the reader wavering between credulity and skepticism.

Acquired Dec 13, 1999
City Lights Book Shop, London, Ontario

[Ramón · Rating 3 out of 5]

Remember that number of stars is how much you like it, not a literary evaluation. This is a pretty silly book, to be honest, but it was fun for me as an outed low-grade conspiracy theorist. Stay away from this book if the Federal Reserve seems like a totally normal idea to you or if you think Marilyn Monroe actually caused her own death with an overdose.

[D. · Rating 4 out of 5]

A very informative, if brief, introduction to 80 modern conspiracies. The title is actually a bit of a misnomer, because not all of the items discussed are "conspiracies," per se. Still, it was an enjoyable read, and well-worth tracking down, if only for the valuable bibliographies after each of the articles.

[Susan · Rating 2 out of 5]

Mixed with well documented facts and popular theories of what may have really happened in 60 historical events. Will have the reader asking if they belive the documented outcome of the event or if they should be asking if something else occured.

[Carol Ann · Rating 2 out of 5]

I had initially requested 70 greatest, however 60 turned out to be plenty. Everything is a conspiracy, I am still trying to figure out why I wanted to read it. Someone put it in my mind, must be a small conspiracy!

[Robert · Rating 3 out of 5]

I enjoyed reading a book like this one, because i found out many new conspiracies and theories. Even though I don't believe all of them, I have a better knowledge on conspirational theories and conspiracies.

[Joy · Rating 3 out of 5]

I read this a long time ago and now I see there are at least 30 new conspiracies I need to catch up on.

[Ivy · Rating 3 out of 5]

it's just a bunch of theories on historical as well as current events, so however you interpret this context is really at your own discretion...

[Lisa]

Awesome

[Andrew · Rating 2 out of 5]

That's not Oswald in the doorway!

[F. John]

This is a veritable into course to conspiracy theory stories. Makes you wonder...

[Jeremy Burch · Rating 5 out of 5]

Top notch coverage of some of the greatest nut theories out there. Food for thought though,....BTW,...when you buy this your name goes on Big Brothers watchlist. I'm kidding,....or am I?

[Nanci Svensson · Rating 2 out of 5]

If I were compiling an encyclopedia of conspiracy theories, I would have so much fun! These authors did not have fun.

[Tonka0405 · Rating 4 out of 5]

The book is ok, made me think about some stuff. But maybe too focused on the theories about CIA.

[DimKar · Rating 2 out of 5]

Μέτρια γραφή και τελείως ασύνδετο περιεχόμενο. Ένα από τα λίγα βιβλία που με κούρασαν και σίγουρα δεν θα το πρότεινα σε κανένα.