I can't understand why anyone would call this boring. It's densely packed with information that covers a lot of territory, so by nature of the format, you've got to wrestle with the content to really get a grip on the concepts. That's not because it's particularly difficult, but more because you've got to deal with each author's decisions for balancing content with economy of space. I read this book's ninth edition for a class on psychotherapies and during that semester, I also found my mother's copy of the same book from 1976, which she used for graduate school. The content is updated now, of course, but the principles of organization behind the text remain the same. Each section of the text is written by a different author, and each author is well-experienced with the subject on which they write. This allows you to gain a little insight into why each method or system is favored by a certain individual, while comparing the contrasts between the section's main subject, its antecedents, descendants, and parallels. It can be a nice leisurely read, but I think it's best experienced not treated as such. You have to work with it, which I find more engaging.