This is an excellent and educational read about Mahathir and indirectly about the Malaysia of the eighties and nineties. It is admittedly the first book of history I'm reading on Malaysia so this is not necessarily an informed review. Having said that the author Barry wein, a seasoned journalist, is an excellent writer and appropriately sets the historical backdrop for each chapter, which is organized topically, rather than chronologically. The discussion is thorough, the sourcing is extensive, and what surprises me for a work of this sort, wein appears to have done up to date interviews and reportage of previously undiscovered material in his work; in that sense it blends history and journalism.
The overall verdict is critical and I am surprised, though pleasantly so, that on its publication in singapore, Malaysia did not ban this book despite considering it for a few months - indeed I picked it up at the kl airport. Malaysia has indeed developed economically over the last thirty years, and Wein generously gives Mahathir credit for architecting that growth, however the overriding impression is that underneath this growth, the Mahathir years will be best remembered for the gradual erosion of the country's democratic institutions, in particularly the judiciary which wein notes was well regarded internationally for its independence prior to Mahathir time in power, the cronyism within umno the incumbent political party, as well as the police force, which a royal commision later found to be the most corrupt institution in the country. Living in singapore, we hear of rising crime rates across the straits of Johor and so this sort of thing feels very topical. It is also fascinating to read about the race based politics, given the racial dynamics of singapore are not dissimilar to Malaysia's. and of course the familiarity of names such as anwar, badawi, Najib razak, etc, who are currently still active political actors, is interesting, though filtered through the lens of a book that is primarily about Mahathir.
On the whole I cannot help but feel that despite his iconoclastic charisma, Mahathir was bad for Malaysia. his contribution was to give it international stature, particularly for its brand of tolerant Islam (at least on the surface; wein makes a convincing case that Malaysia under Mahathir became more polarized racially and religiously) and perhaps to contribute something to its economic development. On the latter point I am skeptical - razaleigh and anwar (one time finance ministers) appear equally if not more competent in terms of economic vision, while Mahathir abetted financial embezzlement and on occasion orchestrated pointless pet projects. Yet there is a human side to him - his marriage was solid, he was reportedly a good and dedicated doctor, and once, when meeting with the Australian pm who had just learnt that his daughter was a drug addict, Mahathir showed courtesy and compassion on a personal level, notwithstanding his political hostility to Australia more generally. Admirable too, I suppose, are his political skill and sheer force of personality.