A friend gave me this book for the brief section in the back, in the Q and A, about the possibility of losing salvation, a topic I've been studying lately, and a topic of some debate.
I'd rate this book between a 4 and a 5. I'd definitely re-read it, which would make it 5 stars, but I felt like it left out some critical information, maybe a whole section's worth, that should have come before the other ones. This new section would be on basic reconciliation skills, being able to talk through problems, hear other points of view, understand the pros and cons of each position, etc.
So many people are quick to label someone a narcissist when they simply disagree, or, especially today, people go to extremes when simplicity would suffice for minor issues. This book is for when basic interpersonal skills don't work, but it does assume that basic reconciliation skills have been consistently tried without success. There do still exist people who can work through difficulties with others, but those are becoming more and more rare, and I feel like there needs to be a book on coaching people through that first.
A quick primer on it would include, among other verses:
"If your brother sins against you, go and show him his fault, just between the two of you. If he listens to you, you have won your brother over. But if he will not listen, take one or two others along, so that 'every matter may be established by the testimony of two or three witnesses.' If he refuses to listen to them, tell it to the church; and if he refuses to listen even to the church, treat him as you would a pagan or a tax collector." - Jesus in Matthew 18:15-17, NIV
Every portion of this is worth noting.
One of my kids brought up the point that this starts out "If your brother..." That is, if it's someone who should care about you, not someone truly dangerous, like a mass murderer or a rapist. Other verses cover those topics. I do think that Jesus meant a wider group of people than just your flesh-and-blood brothers, but I would think that it meant someone who does, or who should, care about you and about the relationship.
"Sins against you." There has to be an understanding if this is actually a sin or is it just a difference of opinion. While I wouldn't want someone to cherry pick a verse, but read it in context, a good rule of thumb would be what does the Bible say about that topic? Does it consider it to be a sin? Whether or not to share said verse would be a matter of wisdom. I'm only talking about clarity for your own self. If it's a matter of opinion, then shrug and go on. I like the color green and you like the color blue. So what? But if you have truly been injured by another's sin against you, then that's another matter.
"Against you." If it's not against you, then why are you interfering? If you are speaking on someone else's behalf, are they capable of speaking for themselves? If so, it would be better for all concerned if they were the ones speaking. If they are infants or incapacitated patients or have mental disorders then that's a different story.
"Like one who seizes a dog by the ears
is a passer-by who meddles in a quarrel not his own." - Proverbs 26:17, NIV
Because you would get injured. Because people need to learn how to speak up for themselves. And yet ...
"Speak up for those who cannot speak for themselves,
for the rights of all who are destitute."- Isaiah 31:8, NIV
Back to Jesus's words in Matthew. There's the word "go." Make the effort. Approach the person who has offended you.
"Show him his fault." Don't go and hang out and pretend everything's okay. Actually have a conversation about the elephant in the room.
"Just between the two of you." So that he can "save face" in front of others. So, it will be easier for him to react in humility without wondering what so-and-so would think. So, there's no gossip or ugly rumors about him that would only get half the story right.
The rest of that passage is good, too. You get the idea.
Now, onto this book, when normal conversations don't work.
I thought this book was very good and had a lot of depth in pulling out truths from the Bible.
It did well on balancing Matthew 5:20-22 telling us not to call someone a fool (with dangerous consequences!) versus all the other verses that do call people a fool. Those other verses, though, I would say, generally describe an action the person takes that shows himself to be a fool. It's their listed action or behavior that categorizes them as a fool, not some judgment on our part, and not, as Jan Silvious pointed out with James 1:20, our anger.
And, as this book pointed out elsewhere, we all might have foolish behaviors from time to time and that does not mean we are worthless people. The book was quick to show that God loves not only us, but the "fools" in our lives - in any familial or business relationship.
I appreciated that this book made the distinction between the three types of Biblical fools: kesil (dull, stubborn, and closed mind, particularly to correction), nabal (lacking spiritual perception), and ewil (hardened, bitter, unbending over longstanding time.) I had never known that or appreciated the distinctions before.
"Developing the mindset of a fool, a mindset that insists, 'The rest of the world is really skewed, but I am okay.' This chronic way of thinking is developed when people, out of their own neediness, try to become their own need meeters. Such a position is not uncommon; we all try it. The difference between fools and wise persons is that when wise people discover they can't meet their own needs, they eventually look somewhere else."
I found that to be interesting, because as our world deteriorates, it's easier and easier to think that, among the wildness out there, we are actually doing pretty well. It's also interesting to me that self-reliance could be related to having a fool's mindset. Jan Silvious gave several examples of people who discovered they weren't self-sufficient. That's interesting to me, because recently I've given my own old story of that discovery twice, once to my Sunday School class, and once in a conversation to a friend.
"You know you are right, and you believe you should say something. But the minute you do, it all gets turned around, and somehow you have become the troublemaker." Hmm. Interesting.
It's also interesting to me that the Hebrew word for arrogant is "crosses over all boundaries." That puts a different spin on it. I generally think of boundary-crossers as merely un-informed people who haven't been told yet where the boundaries are. And those naïve boundary-crossers do exist, particularly in children, but not only in children. We also need to make sure that we are not crossing others' boundaries in letting them know where our boundaries are. There are kind ways to do it. "I need ... a minute, some space, some time to think, whatever."
Somehow I hadn't studied at this Proverb before: "When a wise man has a controversy with a foolish man, the foolish man either rages or laughs, and there is no rest." - Proverbs 29:9, NASB
On the other hand, this Proverb is very familiar to me: "Do you see a man wise in his own eyes? There is more hope for a fool than for him." - Proverbs 26:12. I use it to try to remind myself not to get too haughty when things are going well.
I went through the list on page 113 of feelings about the fools in your life and found that almost none of them applied to me. Sometimes I do feel "as if I must protect my heart from my fool," but I do try to be fair to them also, without too much distance. There is a balance there. [I like the spoon quote further down below.]
Likewise, there was a list of questions on 115 about doing things because of your fool that you thought you'd never do. I found that I don't do those things, either. I will go along with a lot that doesn't really matter to me, but when things matter to me, I insist on having my own autonomy in the matter, to decide, as best I can, right from wrong, before God. Not that I'm always capable in myself of doing the right thing quite apart from any relationship or consideration with a fool, but that I don't just go with the flow, and I say so.
"When you allow a fool to define who you are and you fail to correct his definition, you become the exact representation of who the fool says you are." I found that to be interesting, because I don't do that either. I insist on evidence that I've done something wrong or that I'm something negative. I don't just take other people's word for it. And I may enter a period of time considering whether or not it's true, but if I really feel like it didn't fit, then it doesn't stick.
I thought the "List of Lies I Have Believed" on page 134 was interesting. Most of them didn't apply, but I'll claim two: 1. I can do something to change my fool. Namely, simple reason. (But no, I don't feel responsible for their thinking and behavior.) 2. I owe it to God to keep trying to fix my fool.
I also liked the commentary on 1 Corinthians 13:11. "When I was a child, I use to speak as a child, think as a child, reason as a child; when I became a man, I did away with childish things." - 1 Cor. 13:11, NASB
I had never really contemplated what speaking like a child would be like. Jan Silvious had one good idea; there are probably others. Speaking aloud without thinking. And I have been guilty of that.
And thinking and reasoning? Selfishly. "If you are focusing on your fool, expecting him to give you what you want, then you are engaging in childish thinking. When you link up with a fool, you'll find that there is very little thought for you. A fool is so absorbed with himself that his giving is usually self-serving."
"She did not have to have Tad's acceptance to be a whole person. She could be whole with or without his attention or approval." Amen.
"It is a childish dream to believe your fool will become the person you want him to be. It is an immature hope that through what you say or do or try to make happen, your fool will one day turn around and say, 'You know, you are right. I have been wrong. I'm sorry.'"
"But the wisdom from above is first pure ..." - James 3:17, NASB. I hadn't really considered before what would make wisdom pure. William Barclay said when it's "cleansed of all ulterior motive." - The Daily Study Bible.
"When a fool erupts, you need to recognize that the anger being thrown at you is intended to bring about a response. It is designed to make you sad, to make you behave, to make you fearful, or to push you away. If you respond predictably, that anger will be used on you again to elicit your predictable response. If you respond with tears every time, you are predictable. If you withdraw, you are predictable. If you apologize and promise to do better, you are predictable. If you leave, you are predictable. If you fight back, you are predictable."
Interesting. I tend to do what I had intended to do anyway, unless there was a reasonable, compelling reason. (Yes, I have "reason" twice in that sentence. I don't know how else to say it.) But, sometimes, if necessary, or on the spur of the moment, without forethought, I do fight back.
"Fools never see what they do as harmful because their reality is their reality. Truth is whatever they make it out to be; therefore, whatever they do is acceptable in their own eyes."
I had heard part of the explanation of burning coals before, but not all of it, about "But if your enemy is hungry, feed him, and if he is thirsty, give him a drink; for in so doing you will heap burning coals upon his head." - Romans 12:21, NASB. I had heard before that this referred, not to violence, or to even passive-aggressive pain, but to the practice of one carrying a tray of ashes over their head, an expression of shame. I had not heard that it was also an act of compassion - the giving of a source of heat from one person to another.
"Being kind to him doesn't mean giving in to his manipulation and demands and responding with 'good stuff.' When you understand that the fool's most desperate need is to wise up, then your generous kindness becomes a strategy to point out his folly. By your goodness you will paint a contrast that maybe even your fool can 'get.' And whether or not your fool 'gets it,' you will have done the right thing. Your goal in relating to your fool will be to overcome his evil by doing good for the purpose of exposing his folly and bringing the fool to repentance."
I appreciated the discussion on bitterness, forgiveness, and what it does and doesn't mean.
"When you encounter one of these people, you are probably polite, kind, and share only the information that needs to be given in order to conduct the business you have. When you detach from your fool, he becomes this kind of 'stranger' to you. You do not open yourself up for intimate conversation about either of you, but you do speak with civility and kindness."
I liked the saying from Kentucky (although I'm from Kentucky and I've never heard it): "That's when you feed someone with a long-handled spoon!"
"You must speak the truth with strength and dignity. In doing so, you are assuming responsibility and not leaving it up to your fool to define you or your relationship with him. Knowing that one of the major marks of a fool is his unwillingness to look at the facts, you may ask, 'What good will it do to speak the truth if it is just going to be thrown in my face?' Think about it, my friend: Maybe you need to speak the truth for you. Maybe you need to hear yourself calmly saying what is true instead of arguing and using angry words as weapons to defend yourself or wound your fool. It is important to speak the truth, even if only one of you is listening. When you simply speak the truth and then refuse to be drawn into combat, your wisdom will lead you to safety."
"To be sure, the fool in your life will not look kindly on your change, because for you to change means that he is no longer in control. Consequently, he will respond with anger in one way or another. It is important to recognize what your fool's anger is all about and why it has no power to harm you. Your fool wants to control, so when you leave him to face God and the consequences alone, the fool's anger will have lost some of its punch. He will become uncomfortable. This may intensify your difficulty for a while, but if you are committed to being a wise person, you will remain steadfast. When you are rejected, badgered, raged at, or manipulated, you will be able to persevere in the course you have chosen if you remember there is great purpose in what you re doing... a strength that only God can give as you seek Him rather than grope to settle things for yourself."
"She treated her kindly, but made it clear that her own life was going on apart from her daughter's crisis."
I had to cringe a little at the Jeremiah 29:11-14 passage because I felt it was taken out of context.
Favorite quotes:
"We say, then, to anyone who is under trial, give Him time to steep the soul in His eternal truth. go into the open air, look up into the depths of the sky, or out upon the wideness of the sea or on the strength of the hills that is His also, or, if bound in the body, go forth in the spirit; spirit is not bound. give him time and, as surely as dawn follows night, there will break upon the heart a sense of certainty that cannot be shaken." - Amy Carmichael in "Gold Cord"
"I have a lovely word for you: Luke 4:30. 'Jesus passing through the midst of them went His way.' We are meant to pass through the midst of whatever comes and not get upset or even inwardly ruffled." - Amy Carmichael in "Candles in the Dark"
"We cannot convict of sin, create hunger and thirst after God, or convert. These are miracles, and miracles are not in our department." - Ruth Bell Graham in "Prodigals and Those Who Love Them" (I love that book, by the way.)
"Good and upright is the LORD;
therefore He instructs sinners in His ways." - Psalm 25:8