Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Forensic Evidence: Science and the Criminal Law

Rate this book
One of the greatest challenges encountered by those in the forensic sciences is anticipating what the state and federal courts will - or will not - allow as valid physical evidence. With this in mind, the author of Forensic Evidence: Science and the Criminal Law, Second Edition analyzes and explains the judicial system's response to the applicability of forensic science in the investigation, prosecution, and defense of criminal activity. Each chapter of this comprehensive yet accessible resource provides an overview and analysis of the scientific and legal aspects of a particular forensic discipline. An important new feature of this second edition is that each chapter focuses on discussions of recent forensics literature reviews from Interpol's 14th Annual Forensic Science Symposium. This latest edition also updates previously discussed cases and presents the most recent applications of the Frye and Daubert standards, the admissibility of eyewitness identification, the upsurge of cases and statutes that involve post-conviction DNA, and the increased interest in re-examining cold cases.

As challenges to forensic evidence become increasingly rigorous, so does the need for intense preparation. Forensic Evidence: Science and the Criminal Law, Second Edition is the book that those in the forensic sciences need to have on hand to successfully prepare for what may await them in the courtroom.

536 pages, Hardcover

First published August 23, 2000

3 people are currently reading
12 people want to read

About the author

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
0 (0%)
4 stars
2 (50%)
3 stars
1 (25%)
2 stars
1 (25%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 of 1 review
Profile Image for Sylvester.
1,355 reviews32 followers
December 25, 2016
A review on how different forensic sample types are used in the court, some are more straight forward while others provided weak support for the cases. It is well researched and written but can be a little dry to read if you are not interested in the details of each individual case.
Displaying 1 of 1 review

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.