Johnson, born weak and half-blind, shambolic and poverty-stricken, became the most admired and quoted man in the eighteenth century. Thrown out of Oxford for a lack of funds, he rose to celebrity: author of the Dictionary, a friend to the king, companion of Reynolds, Goldsmith and Garrick. David Nokes looks beyond Johnson's remarkable public persona and beyond the Johnson that Boswell to some extent created. Nokes looks at his troubled relationship with his first wife, whom he married for money but felt guilty about for the rest of his life; at his family, who haunted his dreams for years; and at his difficult, intimate relationship with Mrs Thrale. He shows a man who gave a quarter of the government pension he received to the poor, filled his home with the blind and destitute, and bequeathed his wealth to Frank Barber, an emancipated black slave brought from Jamaica. Insightful and engaging, Samuel Johnson draws an illuminating portrait of Johnson, his life and world.
A scholar of 18th-century English literature, David Nokes, FRSL, was Professor of English Literature at King's College London. He attended King's College School, Wimbledon, London. He received an MA from Christ's College, Cambridge in 1972 and a Ph.D. in 1974.
I can't figure out what this book is for. There's nothing wrong with it; it's smoothly and pleasantly written; but anyone who knew enough about Johnson to want to read it in the first place would find nothing here new or newly put. "Men more frequently require to be reminded than informed," said Johnson, but they could be reminded of everything here in dozens of other books already adequately written. Of the making of books there is no end.
This is the first biography of Samuel Johnson I've read, meaning much of the material was fresh to me. Until now I had a limited knowledge of the man.
I was inspired to read it having just finished a bio of Hester Thrale, his 'dear mistress'. I was surprised to be moved by the ending, which paints a picture of a melancholy, lonely man.
This book tells us that Johnson spent his life battling with his thought-life, his procrastination and his lack of income. It tells Johnson's story, occasionally digging into deeper analysis of his work and approach.
As an introduction to Johnson it's perhaps not ideal. Some of the writing was challenging - a few sentences required reading a few times over and even then I could not be sure what the author was saying.
I'm glad to have read it and, for now, I'll hang on to it as a reference for Johnson.
This book gives a wonderful insight into the life of a clever man who was all too human, making his way in 18th C England. Very factual - drawn from his letters and publications - but by the end one feels one really knows the man, so much so that it is possible to read between the lines to apprehend his sadness.
There are numerous biographies of Samuel Johnson. In my opinion this is one of the better recent ones, not because it contains a lot of new information, but because Nokes has a humane and sympathetic understanding of Dr Johnson's character and psychology. It's very readable and not overwhelmingly long.
There was far too much information on other people, many of whom had a small significance in his life, than about the main subject (Johnson). And what of his relationship to Ben Franklin and Frank Barber? I do not recommend this book.
I'm not sure why this book has got such terrible reviews. I really didn't think it was that bad. That said, I was a bit disappointed as my image of Johnson was one of a man of wit and that didn't really come across in this book. Instead I found his character as drawn by Nokes to be kind of needy and whiny and somewhat annoying to be honest. But apart from that it was easy enough to read and I didn't find it as dull as other reviewers have indicated.
Johnson doesn't come out as much of a person in this biography. It is more a he did this, then he went there, then he did that. One thing which did seem to come through is that Johnson didn't seem to take much effort in his work, and only to make money, because he did not have much...not the best image for a literary hero.
Johnson was a very interesting character, but I didn't find this to be an interesting bio. I don't feel that the author ever decided what he wanted to say. I also don't feel that Johnson the person ever really came through.
this has got a bad rep -- because I think it cannot be read without a good knowledge of the 18th C. but as one gets into it it gets increasingly interesting.
Nokes has turned biography into literary criticism (yawn) and singularly failed to bring Johnson to life. I'm crushed with disappointment, I really am.
Joyless bio. One would never know of Johnsons great wit, nor of his acheivements which are consistently underplayed. Rarely have I been more disappointed in a book.