I'm an alumnus of Simon's Rock, and the unequivocal praise for this book on Goodreads is really starting to get to me. In particular, contrary to one review, Gibson is not in any way being fair and balanced in his assessment of the situation. To the contrary, and as might be expected of a grieving parent, this book is neither objective nor rational. Many of the conclusions Gibson comes to (or should I say jumps to) are correct to some degree, but more are just plain wrong, and many of these have since been disavowed by Gibson himself in hindsight. This book was a stage in Gibson's grieving process, one which he has since moved on from for the most part; he's since endowed a scholarship at the school in his son's name, so he can't still believe a lot of what he's written here, and it's unfortunate that this is the part of the grieving process that he decided to publish for national distribution.
With that said, it is absolutely true that Simon's Rock officials, particularly Bernie Rodgers and Ba Win, did mishandle the incident. However, the way Gibson uses this book to blast Bernie, Ba Win, the RDs on duty that night, and various campus policies is both self-serving and ignorant. I knew Bernie and Ba Win both, and they're both good people who genuinely care about the institution and about their students. The problem, which is overlooked by Gibson in his grief, is that running an institution, even one as small as Simon's Rock, isn't just snapping your fingers and something gets done. Procedures need to be followed, and the needs of all stakeholders need to be taken into consideration for EVERY decision, no matter how small. You can't just cowboy your way through the process the way the media portrays, and Gibson seems to believe. More importantly, it was 1992. School shootings didn't happen back then, so nobody involved in this situation had any precedent at all. And while I will blame everyone in a position of authority at Simon's Rock at the time for maybe being a little too complacent, a little too dependent on peoples' better natures, that is as far as I will go. What really bothers me about the way that Gibson characterizes school officials is that he seems to have the expectation that anyone who represents the school legally is going to come fawning over him and treat him like the most important person in the room, as though Wayne Lo's rampage was something that happened to him alone. What does he expect them to do, say "yeah, we totally screwed up, here, feel free to sue us now"?
Further, his characterizations of these peoples' emotional states are just unfair, particularly Bernie Rodgers, whom he derides as being "cold and distant". That's just the way Bernie copes with tragedy in public. I attended the funeral of his wife, whom he loved dearly, and he barely cried. He's just a very stoic individual, and a bit socially awkward outside of a podium. So for Gibson to deride him as being "cold and distant" is both unfair and selfish. Similarly, there's this air throughout that Gibson is the only person who has suffered grief because of this incident and needs to be universally recognized. This is both unrealistic and selfish in the extreme. Galen Gibson died that night, yes. But Nancunaz Saez died that night, too, which many people seem to forget thanks to the fact that he was a faculty member and didn't have a demagogue father writing a book about his death. Theresa Beavers, the security guard who was shot by Lo in the spine and paralyzed, sued SRC and won. Many other students were injured, and even more suffered PTSD. It's still a topic that gets brought up on that campus TODAY, 20 years after the fact. There were a LOT of people suffering because of Wayne Lo, not just Greg Gibson. Galen Gibson's death was a tragedy, but Greg Gibson writing a book about it in which he, Greg Gibson, is the most important character is completely self-serving and ridiculous.
Finally, let's give SRC credit for one more very important thing: this book is freely available in their library, which is where I first read it. I believe that copy is autographed by Gibson himself, and may have been donated by him. But if SRC were really sincere about suppressing the truth, as Gibson seemed to believe when he wrote it, they wouldn't have put it on the shelf.
I'm not trying to diminish the pain of Gibson's loss. But this book is all that - pain, most of it irrational. It's a good study of the irrationality of grief, but I wouldn't take anything Gibson says in this book at face value, because it's almost totally wrong, and the author himself no longer believes much of it.