I was not encouraged to read this volume, Death by Chocolate Redux, because of the overall Goodreads rating, which is very low. I was encouraged to read it because it is mentioned in a book I recently read on Hemingway in Comics, which mentions this work. It’s a collection of Death by Chocolate stories based in different genres, but it doesn’t announce itself as such, so it seems kind of incoherent, which may not be quite fair. It’s just hard to figure out what it s going on, and it’s hard to get the tone, which may be hard to keep consistent in that this series began with a Xeric application more than a quarter century ago. Artist David Yurkovich developed his chops over that period, so the styles sometimes seem inconsistent, even when we know that he revised much of it for this collected volume (thus redux).
Yurkovich says in the appendix that some folks christened him “The King of Quirky,” and this seems kinda right. I don't know about "king," but you know, it is quirky, and thus attractive for me in the largely predictable world of comics. But he’s a fine cartoonist, with an original (and quirky) (and not deeply developed) central concept: It features a guy named Swete who is composed of chocolate. No, we don't know why. But just go with it, Yurkovich says. Relax. Of course there are many books and series named Death by Chocolate, but in spite of that title its not all that much a food-related comic.
But it does have touches of humor in it throughout.
As Yurkovich says, he saw in the mid nineties that a lot of comics looked the same, and he was trying to find his own niche, and trying some different approaches to comics storytelling. But he doesn’t seem to have a deep overall purpose to the whole thing. He just likes to throw weird stuff on the pages of his stories to see if they stick, and some do.
The basic schtick here is a kind of X-Files thing. Swete works with a woman named Anderson (and who is not chocolate) and they time travel in a chocolate car. Anderson and Swete work for the Food Crimes Division of the FBI, Anderson being roughly modeled on Gillian Anderson. Swete is not modeled on anything, except maybe a chocolate Matrix character, dunno.
Some quirky stuff in here:
*Eternity pasta?
*Hemingway makes a pretty significant appearance, for no apparent reason beyond what he says in the appendix, that Hem is his favorite author and he always wanted to put him in a comic! Hi appearance is completely random, such randomness probably being the reason so many people dislike this comic, but hey, I 'm relaxed here, going with it. In one section a (talking, obviously!) dog--an extraterrestrial talking canine named Geoffrey--asks Hem to teach him how to do creative writing, and Hem refuses, natch. Because why would Hem do that? It doesn't make sense to have him do that! (As if logic were the driving force of this plot).
*At one point in the appendix Yurkovich admits that he put a buncha cars in because he wanted to learn how to draw cars better. See? This is the problem with having literary types reading certain comics. We have all these plot and world-building expectations, and an artist just wants to learn to draw better, that's his motivation! Okay, we'll go with how YOU want us to read it, dude! Or I will, anyway. I think you lost most of us along the way with your King of Quirkiness.
*There’s a kind of Matt Kindt vibe to it, a sorta batshit pulpy narrative approach he sometimes seems to take seriously, and sometimes plays for obvious laughs.
I had very low expectations for this given the low rating and then didn’t end up disliking it. He's a pretty good cartoonist even here in his early stages of his doing the work. He admits he is trying to learn the craft from Will Eisner and others. It’s a genre blender: thriller, horror, crime, sc-fi. Have you ever heard anything quite like it? That in itself is almost enough to justify taking a look at it. I read it on Hoopla.