Louis L'Amour, of course, is a quintessential American popular novelist and short story writer, the leading name in the modern Western genre, an author whose phenomenal sales the world over are generally conceded to reflect his genuine ability as a storyteller. He's also my wife Barb's favorite writer. So it's perhaps surprising that this is the first of his novels that I've read. However, it definitely won't be the last!
This is not, in terms of length, one of L'Amour's major novels. One of the longer works, because of the larger scope, would probably have been more textured and allowed for more character development. However, for this read I wanted a shorter work. I also wanted something that's not part of a series, though according to the Goodreads entry this one is. That designation can be a bit misleading, though; according to Barb, the Talons and Chantrys, like the Sacketts, are large extended fictional families that the author often recurs to, in one area or generation or another, but the individual books are mostly themselves essentially free-standing. Here, our hero occasionally makes some passing reference to his great-grandfather, the founder of his family line (who no doubt has a book or books devoted to him!); but this story can certainly be read independently. This is also not really a "Western," despite L'Amour's identification with the genre (and I didn't "shelve" it as such). He wrote similar tales of two-fisted adventure in other settings, both historical and contemporary; this is the former, with most of the plot taking place well east of the Mississipi and probably none of it any further west than present-day Missouri. Also, our time-frame is 1821, well before the era of westward expansion that forms the typical Western setting. (If our characters here pack guns, they're flintlock rifles or pistols, not Colts; and nobody's into cattle-punching.) It also has elements of the mystery or espionage thriller; the British officer in the Goodreads description above was trailing a British felon and Army deserter who's conspiring to seize the Louisiana Territory and set himself up as dictator of it.
As I noted above, I think this novel might have been better at longer length, with more development. Sometimes the hero's reflections have a bit too much repetitive angst over his course of action; Tabitha Majoribanks, while she's a smart, brave and strong-willed heroine, can come across as a bit too arrogant and bossy; and I felt the ending was too rushed. Also, while L'Amour mostly did his historical homework (a hallmark of his writing), I did catch him in a couple of slight errors in the dating of actual events that are mentioned in passing. That's why this wasn't rated as a four-star read.
It did, however, earn a solid three, meaning that I did genuinely like it. L'Amour has a good writing style, one that serves to move the flow of events without calling attention to itself; he's a capital storyteller, and the book's a page-turner. His characters are mostly vivid, and Jean (Anglicized as John) Daniel Talon is the kind of hero who commands my respect. Another strength of the book is the fact that L'Amour clearly values what someone (I think T. S. Eliot) has called "the permanent things" --the verities that truly matter for human life and society. So I'm delighted to finally have made his acquaintance as a novelist (I'd read his short story, "The Gift of Cochise," which I highly recommend, some years ago), and look forward to someday reading some of his more substantial works!