(I received this book for free via this site's giveaway program.)
I'm going to say something about this book that sounds like a compliment, but I don't mean it that way. So, if you're reading this review, you should feel free to interpret what I'm about to say however you like. If you think that it's a compliment, well, then maybe this is a book that you'd like. If you think that it's not a compliment, then maybe this is a book you should pass on.
With that said, here's my very brief take on "Lot": this reminds me a lot of Junot Diaz, but "Drown" Diaz, not "Oscar Wao" Diaz.
Now, again, that probably sounds like a compliment. To compare Washington to a famous, award-winning, possibly groundbreaking novelist is to offer him praise - or, at least, so it seems. But I didn't really love "Drown," and I have to say that I didn't love "Lot," either. Let me run down some of the reasons why:
-I feel like I learned almost nothing about Houston after having read this book. Maybe that's not Washington's fault - maybe, for instance, all American cities are homogenizing so quickly that there's nothing distinctive about Houston at all - but I like it when books have a strong sense of place, and this one did not. I think that Washington tried to establish this sense of place through the use of geographical proper nouns (streets, neighborhoods, etc.), but I've never been to Houston, so those names don't mean anything to me. So far as I can tell, this whole book could've taken place in Chicago or New York or Florida or southern California. Maybe your experience will be different, but that was my feeling.
-This prose style is no longer new or exciting to me. Again, Diaz (among others) was doing this stuff twenty-three(!!!) years ago. I'm no longer impressed just because Washington can intersperse Spanish and curse words in with his narration. I will give him this much credit, though: he doesn't italicize the Spanish, which I appreciate. It's about time that we gave up on that ridiculous convention.
-Too many of these stories have trapdoor endings. What I mean by that is this: the bulk of the story will be emotionally level or steady, and then in the last paragraph or so Washington will pull the bottom out of it. I understand that this is a stylistic choice and I know that it can work sometimes, but either it's not my favorite story pattern or else I just don't like the way that (or maybe the frequency with which) Washington does it. I'd prefer for the emotions in the story story to be moving the whole time.
-Probably my biggest complaint is that most of these stories feel like they're being overheard from the other side of a window. That is, rather than feeling deeply immersed in these characters' realities, I feel like everything is at a remove. In fact, this is such a trend with "Lot" that one of the stories is almost explicit in the way that it distances the reader from the narrative. In "South Congress," the narrator rides along with a drug dealer and listens to his stories about his life, his job, and so on. But because of this ride-along story structure and the brevity of the story, we, as readers, only get the barest sketch of the drug dealer's life. (After all, our narrator knows only what comes out in conversation, which is, realistically, not all that much.) The result of this is that, when the drug dealer's arc comes to an end, that end is not entirely satisfying - and then, when the *narrator's* arc ends a page or two later, we know so little about him (because we've spent the whole story with someone else) that it's even *less* satisfying. This is how I feel about most of the book: as though I'm in a car with Washington, listening to him tell gossipy stories about friends of his who I've never met. I get in, he talks for fifteen or twenty minutes, and I get out going, "...wait, who was that, again?"
Still, that being said, I do think that Washington has potential. "Navigation" was shaping up to be a subtle and interesting story before its gratuitous trapdoor ending, and "Peggy Park" is a nice piece of work (although it's also the shortest, and I can't decide whether that augurs well or poorly for Washington). If he can manage to peel himself away a little bit from the Diaz impression that he seems to be doing, and if he can find a story that requires him to break the surface instead of always skimming along it, I think that I'd enjoy reading Washington. So I wouldn't necessarily recommend this book, but I would recommend finding his first novel (assuming he gets around to one) in a bookstore and reading the first few pages to see if he's grown any as a writer.